John Pfaff

Stop creating new sentences that humans were never meant to have hit their eyes.

The one in this screenshot is surely a cursed phrase that opens some portal to an even-deeper hell.

I didn’t say they don’t. I’m literally encouraging them to fight for the gerrymander they are trying to do.

I’m saying that if SCOTUS is going to selectively strike them down, Dems should ignore that clearly unconstitutional approach.

And every Dem w POTUS ambitions should say “each unconstitutional opinion is one more person added to the bench when I win the job.”

SCOTUS popularity has never been lower.

This is the time to simply wrest power away from SIX MEDIOCRE LAWYERS—SIX PEOPLE—who have decided they get to do whatever they want.

They don’t, if we don’t let them. They have NO enforcement power besides the moral authority they chose to burn for Trump.

We need Democratic governors and mayors to just start saying “ha, buddy: no” to these flagrantly misbehaving SCOTUS-ppl (I can’t even call them “j***ices” anymore).

Their power is solely that we don’t say that.

Take the fight to them. Stop doing their work for them, which they are banking on.

If this is what they are doing, then @governor.ny.gov should just say “my side wins, your side loses” is not a constitutionally valid way to interpret the Constitution—bc it damn well isn’t—and then say “so the new maps stay.”

You aren’t obligated to follow an illegal court. They just WANT you to.

Yeah, AEDPA is bad too. There's just only so many atrocities any one person can focus on, and mine's been much more on the PLRA, which I think gets even less attention than AEDPA (which still gets far too little), and is more directly tied to prison growth issues that are my wheelhouse.

Yeah, it's not great that it has taken on two contradictory definitions.

But to argue that the drop-as-release is the LEGALESE take is what really got me. Not that it's confusing, but that the legal profession is using it in this way a technical term.

Excellent thread and piece on underfunded indigent defense.

Gideon and Argersinger were, like many SCOTUS decrees, unfunded mandates, which states have been eager to leave underfunded.

Courts could force the issue via ineffective assistance rulings, but SCOTUS's Strickland standard is ... strict.

a man with a beard wearing a crown and a helmet is standing in a dark room . Alt: a man with a beard wearing a crown and a helmet is standing in a dark room . saying you make me sad

I also want to say I'm very disappointed in you, Bluesky. I read ~100 comments to the Rupar post, and there were ZERO WH40K comments, despite an aging man of an orange hue talking abt Terra.

I don't even PLAY 40K, and I could see the reference.

I thought the nerd quotient here was MUCH higher.

a man with a beard wearing a crown and a helmet is standing in a dark room . Alt: a man with a beard wearing a crown and a helmet is standing in a dark room . saying you make me sad

I also want to say I'm very disappointed in you, Bluesky. I read ~100 comments to the Rupar post, and there were ZERO WH40K comments, despite an aging man of an orange hue talking abt Terra.

I don't even PLAY 40K, and I could see the reference.

I thought the nerd quotient here was MUCH higher.

His imperial aspirations know no limit, here or in the Void.

You can see the final drop become airborne. Similar to the mechanism that aerosolizes toilet water when you flush. Also how COVID and other diseases become airborne.

Me: Here's something to take our mind off the horrors we live in.

This website: Man, doesn't this MAKE YOU THINK OF COVID?!

It's okay to sometimes just enjoy life. Even when things are bad--actually, ESPECIALLY when they are. Getting publicly mired in constant misery is bad for everyone.

YouTube video by The Slow Mo Guys How small does water get? #shorts #slowmo

So, a break from ... all this.

This could be one of the most cool, beautiful, and intriguingly soothing things I've seen in a long time.

I feel like no other law has such a bad ratio of "actual harm done" to "people not knowing or caring about it" than the PLRA.

While advocates have spent YEARS screaming about the mostly-irrelevant 1994 Crime Bill, the Prison Litigation Reform Act (the law at issue here) quietly grinds away, shielding our brutal prison system from whole swathes of accountability, almost completely ignored.

But AFAIC recall, not one Dem POTUS candidate has said a word about the PLRA (it’s possible that Castro did back in 2020, but if he did he’s the only one).

It flies under the radar. And kill is literally lethal.

And on and on. Here, today: not letting poor inmates w no other options engage in common practices other plaintiffs are allowed to.

Plaintiffs who, thanks to the 13A loophole, are distinctly UNABLE to raise funds to otherwise pay.

Just brutality at every turn.

Or the misinterpretation of obscure, poorly-written funding provisions means, now, that lawyers in these cases only get a (low) fixed % of damages.

That’s bad enough.

But it gets worse, in ways that (again) don’t lead to easy stories.

Most big cases are for INJUNCTIONS, not damages.

So fee? $0.

When 9th Cir put entire CA prison system in receivership, they reported that overcrowding—enabled by PLRA limits on protesting bad conditions—was causing over 60 deaths deaths/yr via bad medical care.

Every death row in the US, combined? Executing fewer than that.

CA GenPop = biggest US death row.

The PLRA is so much harder to get excited abt (ask me how I know!).

It’s abt exhausting state admin options (yawn) before having standing (yawn) to sue in Fed court. It’s about fee structures (yawn), attorney compensation, and lawsuit bonds (yawn).

Legally technical. And deadly.

Now, in practice, once you look at the numbers, the states only took 30% of what was offered, most states took ~nothing, prison pops were already growing by 1995, and actual declined by 2001.

The bill didn’t do much.

But the STORY about it is easy, and gripping. Wrong. But compelling.

It’s a great example of how evil survives by being technocratic, and why it’s important to be passionate abt the boring stuff.

The 1994 Crime Bill gets attention bc the story it tells is easy to grasp and emotional: “Feds offered billions to build prisons, and we took the bribe!”

While advocates have spent YEARS screaming about the mostly-irrelevant 1994 Crime Bill, the Prison Litigation Reform Act (the law at issue here) quietly grinds away, shielding our brutal prison system from whole swathes of accountability, almost completely ignored.

Yet I also have been loyal to here, and this Food Coop crack (which has been proven valid by just how many ppl get the joke without needing an explanation) is spot on, so 🤷.

There are two moments in my past where early snap judgments proved so correct that I am proud of the foresight they reflected:

1. Thinking even during Occupy that Matt Taibbi was suss.

2. Checking out the Food Coop when I moved to Park Slope 20 yrs ago and instantly thinking “no, y’all are nuts.”

I just threw together a website visualizing this ICE contract data! You can browse through the companies and their contracts, and filter them by state micahflee.github.io/ice-contracts/

The GOP has already made it clear that they plan to use Trump's ill-conceived war of choice as a pretext to try to push through the DHS spending bill by stoking fears of a terrorism risk THEY caused.

In the best of times, FBI statements now would be suspect. But under Kash's FBI? All the more so.

Despite the Dragnet "just the facts, ma'am" view of police press releases that we tend to have (important side note: the LAPD was a major consultant for Dragnet, which they saw a great way to burnish policing's rep), police are political actors, and their press statements should be seen accordingly.

It sucks to have to think this way, but:

Just saw a headline saying the FBI is investigating the Austin mass shooting bc of what they claim are preliminary indicators of a "nexus" to terrorism.

I think papers should be VERY wary of reporting FBI claims along these lines early on, bc of this here.