ᓚᘏᗢ

Don’t be a cunt, cunt.

The dems could have abolished ICE. We warned them what would happen.

Waiting for the shitlib wonks to whine about how resisting the gestapo is a bad thing.

@ezraklein.bsky.social you gonna give these girls a eulogy?

Wouldnt it be an 8 piece suit

What a stick of dynamite this one turned out to be
👇💪

The discord is still around and it’s pretty good.

If you torque your hog too much you’ll feel like you need to pee a lot the day afterwards.

Source is Project Silverfish. Go play it!

wait nvmd being fixed would be good too.

oh shit is this a play on words

Being turned into a cat would fix me.

Lowtax was the one that lost to Nixon.

It's been 3 fucking weeks but I finally get a day off tomorrow.

Fuck this efficiency shit. They are making so much money off our labor it's infuriating.
Automation was supposed to make our lives better. But we work more and harder.

Singal’s a cunt, like you.

Everyone in the labour party does that.

Who cares? He’s effective.

“I’m going to implement more efficient technologies to finally turn a bigger profit!”

*labor becomes more productive*

*share of variable capital decreases*

*rate of profit falls across the economy*

“uh oh”

Tempting fate, lol

Damn, this actually kinda makes me feel sad for him.

Wish he'd not suck tho.

The LTV also does not reject the existence of utility or supply and demand determining prices. However, what it does do is show how, for example, things being turned into commodities that are sold on a market is a phenomenon rooted in our means of production and not a neutral thing.

Their are, such as for example the Monthly Review.

The LTV is useful for examining the contradictions in a capitalist mode of production, like the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall and the crises that produces.

Furthermore, this is not Marx’s LTV, but rather Marx’s critique of Ricardo’s LTV. The whole point is to show how economists were talking about prices and units of labor when it is really just social relations, and that these social relations are shaped by our material conditions.

The value is determined by the socially necessary labor time to create it. SNLT isn’t just labor, it’s bound by how much time and effort society thinks should be needed to make a given thing.

The value of something is also not the price of something.

Think of it this way: even if supply and demand was unchanging, and everything was always at perfect equilibrium between how much we want it and how much we have of it, in a capitalist mode of production they would still have different prices.

In marxist economics, value is ‘socially necessary labor time’, which is basically what society determines to be an acceptable amount of time and effort to make something.

Price is determined by supply and demand, but tends to fluctuate around value.

No, price is determined by supply and demand in Marxist analysis.

Exploitation does not occur from exchange, it occurs during production. Surplus value is the difference between the value they produce and the value they receive, not the difference between value and price.

SaDDam Boobssein