If you want a long form philosophical exploration of the current moment, Sam Moyn provides a good one here, despite my interventions: www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKHE...
21.11.2025 22:11 — 👍 15 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1@samuelmoyn.bsky.social
“Gerontocracy in America” (2026) https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374607647/gerontocracyinamerica/ http://campuspress.yale.edu/samuelmoyn
If you want a long form philosophical exploration of the current moment, Sam Moyn provides a good one here, despite my interventions: www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKHE...
21.11.2025 22:11 — 👍 15 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1Terrific piece www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/b...
21.11.2025 23:12 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1"We must move beyond the obsession with the debate on “fascism”—that opponent whose mere mention seems to guarantee the morality and legitimacy of existing parties and systems—while analyzing historically how we got here." Gosh, I have to think about this. jacobin.com/2025/11/fasc...
21.11.2025 15:55 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0Y’all make sure and come by this event today if you’re in New Haven. Going to be a banger. @samuelmoyn.bsky.social
@stevevladeck.bsky.social
@ryandoerfler.bsky.social
Before Joe Biden and the Democrats made it unavoidable, the critique of gerontocracy was coopted by neoliberals out to end the "entitlements" state. But what if only expanding the promise of care can allow for transferring of power and wealth away from those who retain them too long?
19.11.2025 15:16 — 👍 11 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Wait, maybe Weimar is relevant
“Ullrich emphasizes that the Social Democrats didn’t do enough to fundamentally change German society while they could.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/11/b...
Next Friday: epic. If you’re a Yalie, rsvp! @ryandoerfler.bsky.social @stevevladeck.bsky.social @olatij.bsky.social
14.11.2025 19:18 — 👍 7 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0I refer to ethnography finding that when too-young judges are appointed, they act and dress old.
I expect very common even today as you say.
Cover reveal
12.11.2025 10:52 — 👍 62 🔁 11 💬 0 📌 1Gerontocrats crashing out
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/u... via @nytimes.com
"Conservatism against itself"
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/08/o...
It exists
08.11.2025 03:16 — 👍 34 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1Wednesday for Yalies…
Register and come!
No it's not
07.11.2025 04:07 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0TOC, "Gerontocracy in America" (June 2026)
us.macmillan.com/books/978037...
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com
“Seizing the opportunity to reimagine the presidency, after Americans of all stripes built its authority over a century, is critical — which means a plan and promise to make Congress great again,” Samuel Moyn writes.
The imperial presidency wasn’t built in a term - my latest
Comment, denounce, retweet!
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/31/o...
Probably, but then seems like the original Progressives conquered the country connecting their signature political issues to governance reform initiatives.
31.10.2025 14:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The imperial presidency wasn’t built in a term - my latest
Comment, denounce, retweet!
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/31/o...
“Wheatley, an Australian-born professor at Princeton University, has a penchant for metaphor and an inventive flair that make her legal histories come alive.” Fantastic kudos from the great Linda Kinstler. www.nybooks.com/articles/202...
30.10.2025 14:26 — 👍 11 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0🚨🚨New Pod!! 🚨🚨 We have @johnfabianwitt.bsky.social on the pod!!! @samuelmoyn.bsky.social and I talk with John about his amazing and must read new book, The Radical Fund podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d...
28.10.2025 15:28 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1Democrats reckon with how they are implicated - wow newrepublic.com/article/2023...
28.10.2025 11:16 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 2New book, coming soon!
Duncan Bell & Douglas Mao, Utopia (Oxford UP, 2026)
It's a short interdisciplinary volume in the recently launched OUP Literature and Politics series.
global.oup.com/academic/pro...
Apparently there is “a structural weakness of law as a check on the American presidency.” And it took Donald Trump to reveal it.
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/24/u...
The Radical Fund is optimistic about cross-camp creativity, but its deeper moral is institutional. Build power with pluralism in mind, or the answer to “who decides” will, all too quickly, become “the powerful.” balkin.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-...
24.10.2025 15:59 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Epic and necessary. We have traveled light years from the premature analyses 2016-17. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
21.10.2025 12:07 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0‘The tactical choice to center Trump in advertising in 2025’s closing stretch left party strategists concerned about a missed opportunity to forge a more forward-looking vision. “I worry Trump is like crack cocaine for our party,” said a pollster.’ www.nytimes.com/2025/10/19/u...
19.10.2025 19:04 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0