Can only meat machines be conscious?
Computational functionalism claims that executing certain computations is sufficient for consciousness, regardless of the physical mechanisms implementing those computations. This view neglects a compelling alternative: that subcomputational biological mechanisms, which realize computational processes, are necessary for consciousness. By contrasting computational roles with their subcomputational biological realizers, I show that there is a systematic tension in our criteria for consciousness: prioritizing computational roles favors consciousness in AI, while prioritizing subcomputational biological realizers favors consciousness in simpler animals. Current theories of consciousness are 'meat-neutral', but if specific physical substrates are necessary, AI may never achieve consciousness. Understanding whether consciousness depends on computational roles, biological realizers, or both, is crucial for assessing the prospects of consciousness in AI and less complex animals.
Online Now: Can only meat machines be conscious?
08.10.2025 19:03 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Dense longitudinal neuroimaging reveals individual brain change trajectories
Review by Sophia Vinci-Booher, Xueying Ren, Kendrick Kay, Chen Yu, Franco Pestilli, & James Booth
tinyurl.com/jhb5py5d
07.10.2025 19:26 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
It's a privilege to be part of this new review in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social: Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness with modern neuroimaging and biophysical modeling π§΅
#eeg #consci #consciousness #neuroscience
www.cell.com/trends/cogni...
22.09.2025 17:01 β π 14 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0
π¨Out now in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social π¨
We explore the use of cognitive theories/models with real-world data for understanding mental health.
We review emerging studies and discuss challenges and opportunities of this approach.
With @yaelniv.bsky.social and @eriknook.bsky.social
Thread β¬οΈ
29.09.2025 15:04 β π 82 π 28 π¬ 1 π 4
There is a lot of talk about LLMs revolutionizing education. But once you get into it, things are not that trivial.
Here, we summarize the questions that emerge when trying to implement AI Tutors nationwide.
Out now in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social
#edusky
authors.elsevier.com/a/1ltdo4sIRv...
04.10.2025 11:35 β π 9 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0
Our recent review article "The Psychology of Virality" with @jayvanbavel.bsky.social
is on the front cover of this month's issue of
@cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social.
07.10.2025 18:28 β π 12 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0
Can AI really help solve the loneliness epidemic?
Advances in artificial intelligence offer an enticing solution to a global problem: perhaps interacting with large language models (LLMs) can help allβ¦
Great piece in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social on why AI won't solve the loneliness epidemic:
"presenting AI as a scalable solution to the loneliness epidemic risks overlooking the structural and societal roots of the problem and may allow us to abdicate our responsibility as a society."
07.10.2025 18:59 β π 19 π 10 π¬ 0 π 0
Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis
Neuroscience has probed only a sliver of the rich cognitive, emotional, and social behaviors that enable primates to thrive in the real world. Technological breakthroughs allow us to quantify these behaviors alongside wireless neural recordings. New studies reveal that neural activity is intricately bound to movement and is profoundly modulated by behavioral context, emotional states, and social dynamics. We frame our review of primate neuroethology around Niko Tinbergenβs four foundational questions β function, mechanism, development, and evolution β to unify classic ethological insights with modern neuroscience tools. We demonstrate that investigating natural behavior promises deep insights into primate cognition, which are relevant for advanced brainβmachine interfaces, improved therapies for neurological disorders, and deeper understanding of natural and artificial intelligence.
Online Now: Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis
26.09.2025 19:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Live questions about the mindβs eye
We live much of our lives in our heads, detached from the here and now β as when we recollect the past, anticipate future possibilities, lose ourselves in a daydream, a novel, or our favourite corner of science [1]: βwhat sets us apart isβ¦a life in the mind, the ability to imagineβ [2]. For most of us, sensory imagery, which allows us to experience the sensory properties of objects in their absence, is a central element of our imaginings [3]. The realisation that ~4% of people lack visual imagery, facilitated by a term with which to describe this, aphantasia [4], while an even higher proportion, with hyperphantasia, enjoy imagery rivalling the vividness of perception, has triggered a recent surge of research.
Online Now: Live questions about the mindβs eye
11.09.2025 12:41 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 2
An online-only journal publishing Reviews, Perspectives & Comments across psychology, its applications & societal implications. Tweets from the editors. https://www.nature.com/nrpsychol/
associate professor, cognitive sciences, uc irvine
https://aaron.bornstein.org/
@aaronbornstein@neuromatch.social
Professor, Santa Fe Institute. Research on AI, cognitive science, and complex systems.
Website: https://melaniemitchell.me
Substack: https://aiguide.substack.com/
Developmental cognitive scientist. Assistant Professor at Vanderbilt University. Co-host of The It's Innate! Podcast. PI of the Computational Cognitive Development Lab. Dad. Husband. Human. (he/him/his)
Cognitive scientist at Princeton, personally & scientifically interested in collaboration | science sketcher | thinking in non-English π΅π·
psychology prof @yale
http://actcompthink.org
assoc prof, uc irvine cogsci & LPS: perception+metacognition+subjective experience, fMRI+models+AI
meta-science, global education, phil sci
prez+co-founder, neuromatch.io
fellow, CIFAR brain mind & consciousness
meganakpeters.org
she/her πππ views mine
I'm a philosopher, psychologist and neuroscientist studying vision, mental imagery, consciousness and introspection. As S.S. Stevens said "there are numerous pitfalls in this business." https://www.subjectivitylab.org
Neuroscientist, Cognitive Scientist. Examining memory, learning, new fMRI methods, β¬οΈ funding for science. Personal account.
Philosopher, writer, ΞλληνοβΟΞ΅ΟΞ±Ξ½ΟΟ. Hon Professor, Sheffield University. Mind, consciousness, illusionism, cog-sci, Ξλλάδα.
Website: https://www.keithfrankish.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KeithFrankish
Neuroscientist @CNRS | @ERCgrantees | interested in how humans perceive humans and understand their actions and interactions | in literature fiction and fashion πΈ
Professor Emeritus, Philosophy, Linguistics, and Cognitive Science, Graduate Center, City University of New York.
Website: https://www.davidrosenthal.org
Dad, recovering researcher, instructor at Harvard Extension, evolutionary psychologist, posts occasionally when my demons quiet down
asst prof @Stanford linguistics | director of social interaction lab π± | bluskies about computational cognitive science & language
Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Oxford @oxexppsy.bsky.social
Interested in cognition and artificial intelligence. Research Scientist at Google DeepMind. Previously cognitive science at Stanford. Posts are mine.
lampinen.github.io
computational cognitive science @ nyu. director NYU minds, brains, and machines initiative. https://gureckislab.org. Are you interested in research in my lab? https://intake.gureckislab.org/interest/
Ecological psychologist just trying to make psychology better at explaining us. I study the perceptual control of action and get cranky about politics and AI technologies. He/him
PI of the https://imaginerealitylab.org/ @uclbrainscience.bsky.social where we investigate the neural and computational mechanisms of mental imagery and reality monitoring. Activist about mental health and EDI in academia. She/her.