👀
08.09.2025 13:23 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0@jrnlofphil.bsky.social
One of the world's top academic philosophy journals, JPhil is published monthly by the non-profit organization, Journal of Philosophy, Inc.
👀
08.09.2025 13:23 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0“Academic Philosophy Data and Analysis (philosophydata.org), a long running project that collects and analyzes data on graduate experience and employment outcomes for philosophy PhDs, is seeking to expand its leadership…from 1 to 3 directors”
Please share!
#philsky
apda.ghost.io/call-for-dir...
Congratulations to Caspar Jacobs on the selection of his JP paper, "Comparativist Theories or Conspiracy Theories?," for the 2024 Philosopher's Annual!
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
Article Title: "Alethic Pluralism and Kripkean Truth"; Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there are different ways of being true, that is, there is a plurality of truth properties, each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth we develop can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.
#newarticle "Alethic Pluralism and Kripkean Truth" by Andrea Iacona, Stefano Romeo, and Lorenzo Rossi
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky
Abstract: Rehabilitating an argument originally proposed by Leibniz, Michael Della Rocca has offered a new argument for the Principle of Sufficient Reason. A crucial element of this argument is that, for every x, the fact that x does not brutely fail to exist is an untrivial requisite of x’s existence. Criticising this claim, I show that the new argument for PSR fails.
#newarticle "No Easy Road to PSR" by Mohammad Saleh Zarepour
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky
Abstract: Andreas and Günther have recently proposed a difference-making definition of actual causation. In this paper I show that there exist conclusive counterexamples to their definition, by which I mean examples that are unacceptable to everyone, including Andreas and Günther. Concretely, I show that their definition allows c to cause e even when c is not a causal ancestor of e. I then proceed to identify their non-standard definition of causal models as the source of the problem, and argue that there is no viable strategy open to them to fixing it. I conclude that their definition of causation is damaged beyond repair.
#newarticle "What Does It Take to Make a Difference? A Reply to Andreas and Günther" by Sander Beckers
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky
Abstract: In light of the problem of logical omniscience, some scholars have argued that belief is question-sensitive: agents don’t simply believe propositions but rather believe answers to questions. Hoek (2022) has recently developed a version of this approach on which a belief state is a “web” of questions and answers. Here, we present several challenges to Hoek’s question-sensitive account of belief. First, Hoek’s account is prone to very similar logical omniscience problems as those he claims to address. Second, the link between belief and action he proposes is too rigid. We close by sketching a generalization of the account that can meet these challenges.
#newarticle "Idle Questions" by Jens Kipper, Alexander W. Kocurek, and Zeynep Soysal
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#openaccess !
28.07.2025 16:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Abstract: Beliefs can be resistant to evidence. Nonetheless, the orthodox view in epistemology analyzes beliefs as evidence-responsive attitudes. I address this tension by deploying analytical tools on capacities and masking to show that the cognitive science of evidence-resistance supports rather than undermines the orthodox view. In doing so, I argue for the claim that belief requires the capacity for evidence-responsiveness. More precisely, if a subject believes that p, then they have the capacity to rationally respond to evidence bearing on p. Because capacities for evidence-responsiveness are fallible and may be masked, beliefs can be held in the face of counter-evidence. Indeed, I will argue that our best science of belief supports the claim that evidence-resistant beliefs result from masks on evidence-responsiveness capacities. This account of belief not only allows for resistance to evidence, but provides us with a framework for describing and explaining actual cases of evidence-resistance.
#newarticle "Resistant Beliefs, Responsive Believers" by Carolina Flores @floresophize.bsky.social
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky
#newarticle
"Ethics and the Limits of Armchair Sociology" by Brendan de Kenessey
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#newarticle #philosophy
Isaac Levi Prize 2024
"Deference Principles for Imprecise Credences" by Giacomo Molinari
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#newarticle #philosophy
The 2023 Dewey Lectures: Challenges to Creating an Egalitarian Society
"Lecture III: Ideology, Fantasy, Myth: Inspiration and Cognitive Bias in Hierarchical and Egalitarian Ideologies" - Elizabeth Anderson
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#newarticle #philosophy
The 2023 Dewey Lectures: Challenges to Creating an Egalitarian Society
"Lecture II: Reconsidering Rousseau's Second Discourse in Light of Contemporary Social Science" - Elizabeth Anderson
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#newarticle #philosophy
The 2023 Dewey Lectures: Challenges to Creating an Egalitarian Society
"Lecture I: A Dual-Equilibrium Model of Psychologically Sustainable Social Contracts" - Elizabeth Anderson
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
A fundraiser has been launched to help pay for the legal expenses of the philosophy major taken by ICE earlier this week, and the Columbia Department of Philosophy has issued a statement about the situation and calling for the university to help him.
16.04.2025 15:03 — 👍 40 🔁 22 💬 0 📌 3Index to Volume CXXI (2024) - The Journal of Philosophy
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky #PhilSky+
#newarticle "Strawsonian Hard Determinism" by Scott Hill
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky #PhilSky+
#newarticle "Revenge for Alethic Nihilism" by Bradley Armour-Garb and James A. Woodbridge
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky #philsky+
#newarticle "How Nudging Upsets Autonomy" by David Enoch
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
#philosophy #philsky #philsky+
#PhilSky
#Philsky+
#philosophy
#PhilSky
#Philsky+
#philosophy
#newarticle "(Competing?) Formulations of Newtonian Gravitation: Reflections at the Intersection of Interpretation, Methodology, and Equivalence" by Kevin Coffey
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#newarticle "Metacognition of Inferential Transitions" by Nicholas Shea
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
Professor Frederick Neuhouser has announced his retirement from the editorial board of The Journal of Philosophy. We thank Professor Neuhouser for his many years of service and his wise counsel.
20.02.2025 21:09 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0#newarticle
#onlinefirst
"Kripke on Indirect Senses" by Alexander Johnstone Kühnert
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#Philosophy
#PhilSky
#PhilosophySky
#newarticle
#onlinefirst
"Generalism Without Generation" by Ezra Rubenstein
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#philosophy
#philsky
#philosophysky
#newarticle
#newbookreview
Review of Gillian K. Russell's _Barriers to Entailment: Hume's Law and Other Limits on Logical Consequence_ by Timothy Williamson
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#philosophy
#philsky
#philosophysky
#newarticle
"Proof That Knowledge Entails Truth" by Brent G. Kyle
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#philosophy
#philsky
#philosophysky
#newarticle
"Feeling a Beat" by Alex Kerr
www.pdcnet.org/jphil/conten...
#philosophy
#philsky
#philosophysky
Hello yes this is The Journal of Philosophy
30.01.2025 19:01 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0