Dunnsky89's Avatar

Dunnsky89

@dunnsky89.bsky.social

I’m liberal, on the spectrum, love sports, gaming, Pokemon, nature, rock music. Proud Marylander. πŸ¦€ Proud public servant. Fuck Donald Trump.

291 Followers  |  791 Following  |  21 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  2.0126

Latest posts by dunnsky89.bsky.social on Bluesky

@glennclarkradio.bsky.social hey Glenn could you ask Jackson Holliday what the III logo on his and Ethan’s hat represents?

05.04.2025 23:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

RESIST.
Don't quit.
Don't stop fighting.
Don't obey in advance.
Don't stop calling them out.
Keep raising your voices as loudly as you can.
Keep organizing your friends, family, everyone.
Keep supporting orgs that are leading the fight.

RESIST.

20.01.2025 04:50 β€” πŸ‘ 30430    πŸ” 7606    πŸ’¬ 714    πŸ“Œ 339
Video thumbnail

"[Elon] knows those computers better than anybody. Those vote counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.

IS THAT A FUCKING CONFESSION???

h/t: @acyn.bsky.social

20.01.2025 00:52 β€” πŸ‘ 15681    πŸ” 4405    πŸ’¬ 1700    πŸ“Œ 563
Post image 18.11.2024 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The Purple Ear... Think they bought it? People are wondering if the assassination attempt was staged

The Purple Ear... is for cowards and losers. Think they bought it? People are wondering if the assassination attempt on a former fake president was staged....

Continue reading P2

16.11.2024 03:21 β€” πŸ‘ 356    πŸ” 114    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 6

Do NOT piss of a Canadian.

31.12.2024 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

I'm going to post this video every day so we never forget

21.12.2024 13:20 β€” πŸ‘ 26919    πŸ” 7607    πŸ’¬ 655    πŸ“Œ 326

Donald Trump cannot settle his way out of the fact that he is an adjudicated rapist.

15.12.2024 05:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1231    πŸ” 225    πŸ’¬ 43    πŸ“Œ 6

I heard what appears to be a truism. The US has Freedom "To", while in Europe, we have Freedom "From".
US Freedom To Carry a Gun.
Europe Free From Gun Violence.
US Freedom To choose your health insurance.
Europe Freedom from a fear that health care will cause bankruptcy.

11.12.2024 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Dear Mr. Sauer:
I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action.
As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625,
626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department.
Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action.
First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

Dear Mr. Sauer: I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action. As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625, 626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department. Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action. First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here.
Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration.
Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694
(1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action.
There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton,
520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here. Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration. Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694 (1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action. There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

The NY Attorney General has REJECTED Trump's bid to dismiss his $500M civil fraud judgment post-election. The AG stated that Trump's presidency doesn't shield him from civil litigation over non-official conduct, per the Constitution and multiple court precedents.

10.12.2024 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 14852    πŸ” 3311    πŸ’¬ 434    πŸ“Œ 230
History is full of dictators who were arrested and released. We must have accountability
YouTube video by BryanDawsonUSA History is full of dictators who were arrested and released. We must have accountability

Hitler: Arrested for sedition, released
Stalin: Arrested for sedition, released
Chavez: Arrested for sedition, released
Lenin: Arrested for sedition, released
Mussolini: Arrested for sedition, released

Trump, his Republican enablers, and their January 6th terrorists?
youtu.be/Hl9hvyEkSeQ?...

10.12.2024 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 152    πŸ” 61    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 5

Cc Tulsi Gabbard

07.12.2024 22:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1647    πŸ” 303    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 9

People not elected to government should not have the power to reshape the government, especially people whose obscene wealth depends on the government functioning a certain way.

This is not a hot take.

It's just plain common sense.

07.12.2024 20:04 β€” πŸ‘ 48597    πŸ” 10732    πŸ’¬ 1078    πŸ“Œ 421

@joebiden46th.bsky.social

07.12.2024 22:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

#TruthWarriors

07.12.2024 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 118    πŸ” 28    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

@vanhollen.senate.gov @angelasengov.bsky.social

07.12.2024 00:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
White House Reporter Grills Karine Jean-Pierre Over Hunter Biden Pardon: β€˜Do You Owe an Apology to the American People?’ Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was immediately put on the defensive Friday when reporters dove into the contentious subject of the Hunter Biden pardon.

We spent years hearing about Hunter's laptop. Now we keep hearing ad nauseum about Hunter's pardon.

Why don't we hear about Turnip pardoning all those criminals in his last administration?

BTW, Biden did the RIGHT thing, despite Turnip's bought media.
www.mediaite.com/politics/whi...

06.12.2024 22:46 β€” πŸ‘ 374    πŸ” 81    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 4

What the fuck is the matter with you, dude? DOGE isn’t a legitimate government agency and they want to fire a huge portion of the Federal workforce. Tell Elon and Vivek to go fuck themselves. 😑😑😑

06.12.2024 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks to the left, you can work a 40-hour week, take a weekend off, and still have time to marry whoever you love.

06.12.2024 21:20 β€” πŸ‘ 21425    πŸ” 2916    πŸ’¬ 364    πŸ“Œ 76

Democrats passed the Inflation Reduction Act; capping the cost of insulin at $35 a month for seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare.

Congress needs to finish the job and cap insulin at $35 for all Americans.

06.12.2024 19:43 β€” πŸ‘ 4152    πŸ” 863    πŸ’¬ 73    πŸ“Œ 21
A tweet by Aaron Rupar says, when you’re too transphobic for Elon Musk... It shows a tweet by Nancy Mace mentioning censorship by X and Elon Musk, discussing mens mental health, and advocating against hateful conduct. Hashtag: #HoldTheLine.

A tweet by Aaron Rupar says, when you’re too transphobic for Elon Musk... It shows a tweet by Nancy Mace mentioning censorship by X and Elon Musk, discussing mens mental health, and advocating against hateful conduct. Hashtag: #HoldTheLine.

Honestly, how awful and hateful do you have to be for this to happen?

06.12.2024 21:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2879    πŸ” 215    πŸ’¬ 211    πŸ“Œ 25
Post image

Seen on a friend's IG.

06.12.2024 16:55 β€” πŸ‘ 3825    πŸ” 336    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 21

Good. He’s a fucking piece of shit.

06.12.2024 21:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

yeremi colino, a teenager stabbed to death in NYC last night by a group of men after he told them he didn’t speak english, deserves as much attention as the healthcare CEO, if not more. let’s give it to him. www.amny.com/new-york/man...

06.12.2024 20:36 β€” πŸ‘ 4895    πŸ” 2059    πŸ’¬ 50    πŸ“Œ 47

According to friends who went to the DEFCON hacker convention a few years back, it's possible to crack a voting machine in less than 45 minutes.

06.12.2024 20:36 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Your criminal record, our choice Nick.

06.12.2024 21:27 β€” πŸ‘ 120    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

I totally agree with you. I've screamed it since watching pundits call states that had 5% reporting for Trump.

06.12.2024 20:23 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Honeymoon Won't Last Why Trump's honeymoon is likely to be much shorter than most

β€œTrump appears determined to test if he can squander the goodwill he has, and when he does, it will only serve to reinforce what many already know: his leadership is a clear and present danger to the principles that hold this nation together.” My latest:

adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/the-honeym...

05.12.2024 16:31 β€” πŸ‘ 17375    πŸ” 4075    πŸ’¬ 742    πŸ“Œ 153

@dunnsky89 is following 19 prominent accounts