Those comments have started.

Of course!

Happy birthday to you Zandi 🎉

Well said.

Watching the interview yesterday I felt so sorry for Harry as he sounded devastated and so deflated. I thought he was on the verge of tears the whole time. How he managed to keep composed i have no idea. What little respect I had for our royal family is now gone.

Appalling!

Amen and amen 🙏🏼

I agree that all the royals should pay for their own security. But some would say that they are performing duties on behalf of the UK so us taxpayers should foot the bill. As you say, they are rich enough.

It is well known, from comparing the entries in the royal diaries (which are public) as to which senior royal carries out the most visits/functions (Anne) and which senior royal does the least …

I think there are more Brits in UK who support H&M but have no desire to cope with the toxicity of comments on SM so say nothing. Doesn’t mean that we are in the minority.

He has asked to be able to do that but has been refused. The level of security he’s been given in the UK does not allow him and his own security team the level of intelligence/degree of threats/firearm safety that goes with the level of threat.

He still has private security in the US.

Please don’t lump all Brits in the same category, there are many of us H&M supporters in the UK.

But they are pro-life …

Hear, hear! Well said! I am so tired of people being deliberately ignorant of the facts and just mirroring the hateful agenda of a large proportion of our uk gutter press against Harry and Meghan. It is past time that this agenda comes to a stop.

Me too, and I’m a Brit.

He most certainly is, on both those counts. And long may it continue! I am so happy for him and his family. Onwards and upwards.

So pleased his joy in that laugh 😍

If Labour has the courage to do that.

Whose page are you referring to? Just so that there is no misunderstanding.

I am a fan of Meghan’s, but I don’t follow you so why would I know that you’re also a fan?? As I said earlier, your comment was ambiguous. “They” could’ve referred to H&M the initial subject of the post.

Colourful, healthy and delish. Well done you.

Me too. I’m so pleased for her that she has found safe spaces to be and to enjoy her activities.

Your reply using “they” was ambiguous, it could’ve referred to Harry n Meghan or to the other royals. I’ve seen that same criticism used against the Sussexes so it was understandable for me to read your comment a certain way. Also, there are lots of anti-M accounts that use her photo as a profile.

Says the one with a *copy* of Meghan’s photo for their bio. So “No originality. Just poor imitation.” How hilarious and ironic!!!

Provided Trump doesn’t get to change your constitution to allow himself a third term or even worse, to have no more elections. Wasn’t this hinted at in Project 2025?

Doris, a woman of dignity and discretion.

Sun owner News Group Newspapers's full apology to Prince Harry News Group Newspapers gives a "full and unequivocal apology" to the Duke of Sussex.

A huge achievement on Harry’s part, and of his legal team. A full and unequivocal apology to Harry, his mum, and to Lord Watson from NGN 👏🏼👏🏼

The full apology to Prince Harry from Sun owner www.bbc.com/news/article...

That’s your take. Harry got NGN to admit to unlawful acts used to obtain info into his life, to unequivocally apologise for those acts intruding into his privacy n also to apologise to his mum. Those were serious admissions. NGN also apologised to Tom Watson. A huge win.

It appears that civil law courts prefer suits to be settled outside of public hearings. As a settlement had been offered by NGN, even if Harry were to later win his suit he would’ve had to pay the defendant’s legal costs no matter what amount of money he received.