Kevin Willson's Avatar

Kevin Willson

@kgwillson.bsky.social

Postdoctoral researcher studying dry conifer forest reconstructions in the Colorado Front Range. Fascinated by all things that intersect science, politics, & history.

75 Followers  |  48 Following  |  5 Posts  |  Joined: 15.05.2025  |  1.5013

Latest posts by kgwillson.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

Trees in Fire‐Maintained Forests Have Similar Growth Responses to Drought, but Greater Stomatal Conductance Than Trees in Fire‐Excluded Forests

πŸ”— buff.ly/qyhBjCh
@kgwillson.bsky.social @mhurteau.bsky.social

17.06.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Our findings indicate that reintroducing frequent fire reduces tree water stress without inhibiting growth response to prolonged aridity. This suggests that frequent-fire regimes may help forests better withstand increasingly hot and dry conditions expected under climate change.

09.06.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
FIGURE 6 | Tree densities (Β±one standard error) by diameter class in fire-maintained (orange, n = 22 plots) and fire-excluded (purple, n = 20 plots)
forests. The inset shows boxplots of quadratic mean diameter (QMD) in fire-maintained and fire-excluded plots. ** represents p < 0.01.

FIGURE 6 | Tree densities (Β±one standard error) by diameter class in fire-maintained (orange, n = 22 plots) and fire-excluded (purple, n = 20 plots) forests. The inset shows boxplots of quadratic mean diameter (QMD) in fire-maintained and fire-excluded plots. ** represents p < 0.01.

Growth responses varied with climate and topography while water use efficiency varied with climate, topography, and competition. Trees were more water-efficient in stands with more small trees, which helped explain greater water stress in denser, fire-excluded forests. 4/n

09.06.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
FIGURE 5 | Chronologies of tree-ring width index (RWI) and annual evaporative water use efficiency (eWUE) values with 95% confidences intervals (CI) among trees analyzed for isotopic discrimination from fire-maintained (orange, ntrees = 46) and fire-excluded forests (purple, ntrees = 46). The solid black line represents average growth (RWI = 1). Years are delineated by drought period. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001.

FIGURE 5 | Chronologies of tree-ring width index (RWI) and annual evaporative water use efficiency (eWUE) values with 95% confidences intervals (CI) among trees analyzed for isotopic discrimination from fire-maintained (orange, ntrees = 46) and fire-excluded forests (purple, ntrees = 46). The solid black line represents average growth (RWI = 1). Years are delineated by drought period. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001.

Fire-maintained trees grew faster to begin the first drought, but growth rarely differed among trees for the remaining 21 years. Interestingly, similar growth rates occurred as fire-excluded trees became increasingly more efficient with water, signaling greater water stress. 3/n

09.06.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We quantified stomatal and growth responses to 4-year and 7-year droughts using tree cores, which let us compare wood carbon isotopes and ring-widths among trees over several decades. We also modeled these responses against climate, topography, competition, and fire history data. 2/n

09.06.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That's a wrap, my last chapter has been published in @globalchangebio.bsky.social! Another (huge) thank you to @mhurteau.bsky.social for helping assess #PonderosaPine stomatal and growth responses to #drought in fire-maintained and fire-excluded forests 1/n

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/author...

09.06.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

@kgwillson is following 20 prominent accounts