Lunamann's Avatar

Lunamann

@lunamann.bsky.social

A rogue plushie who arts sometimes (she/they, 28). Loves me some pip and some hat~! Profile pic made by ME AHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA I have two modes: commie pinko scum, and lewd furry weirdo. Please adjust yourself to fhe sight of them. Underage please gtfo

86 Followers  |  409 Following  |  606 Posts  |  Joined: 11.10.2023  |  2.4134

Latest posts by lunamann.bsky.social on Bluesky

We're not in theoretical "they could come after sfw queer content LATER" territory anymore. It is being used to come after sfw queer content NOW.

Spread this around, send the article to any and every news outlet/content creator you can think of. The alarms need to be sounded

And KEEP CALLING

12.08.2025 16:43 β€” πŸ‘ 7453    πŸ” 6313    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 28

Feels like "payment processor Stripe admits to being an anti LGBTQ hate group" should be an actual headline somewhere.

12.08.2025 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 3344    πŸ” 2119    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 6

How do people not realize this does nothing to companies like YT. I like the sentiment if its to spread awareness, but c'mon you really can't believe this works lmao

Here's what actually works:
- use adblock for PC
- use ReVanced for mobile
- continue to watch, it costs them $$$ to serve you videos

12.08.2025 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 301    πŸ” 189    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 4

Stripe crossed a line now.

Call up whatever local LGBT organizations exist in your area, gay activist groups, gay bars, pride organizing committees, folks who schedule drag shows, queer church groups, everyone.

Also libraries and bookstores.

Show up in person to talk to any business using Stripe.

12.08.2025 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 5126    πŸ” 3719    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 20

Same during my call- the wording I used was β€œnon-explicit, legal, non-adult LGBT content”, and I got back the response that β€œyes, stripe is blocking this. We’re a private company, we make our own rules about it.” Was hung up on when I asked why.

12.08.2025 21:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2935    πŸ” 968    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 70

You remember what happened to all those homophobic bakeries? Even the ones who won in court? Even the ones in places where their discrimination was completely legal?

They went out of business.

Because people kept protesting them. Persistently. Not some one-day boycott.

12.08.2025 22:32 β€” πŸ‘ 98    πŸ” 42    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 2

Today's reminder to keep the pressure on! They're hoping we'll shut up, get tired or bored, and just walk away.

If we keep trashing their operational metrics, they'll fold first.

10.08.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 606    πŸ” 628    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Definitely do this, but also change your PFP to Clippy, it's funny

13.08.2025 00:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
WHY?
On July 2025, Steam, a popular storefront to purchase games on PC, and itch.io, a storefront that sells
games, comics, tools, resources and much more, have recently delisted several NSFW games, after the
group Collective Shout published an open letter to payment processors such as Visa, MasterCard, PayPal,
and more. As a result of this letter, payment processors have strongarmed Valve and itch.io into enforcing
restrictive new TOS policies on what kind of content their platforms can host and sell.

Visa, Mastercard, Stripe and Paypal have been censoring free speech and legal business on the internet for TOO LONG. Their most recent targets are Steam and Itch.io, but they have also been pressuring websites like Pixiv, Patreon, Fansly, Onlyfans and MORE for years, applying draconian standards for what kind of adult/pornographic content platiorms and their users can host and sell.

If we as consumers and creators want to regain ground on this issue, we have to make our voice heard.

HOW?
BOMBARD THEM WITH PHONE CALLS
Collective Shout, the organization that lobbied to have Steam and Itch.io change their TOS, did so with only around 1000 phone calls. Visa and MC have backed down from pressuring Onlyians to remove adult content entirely due to public backlash. Clogging their phone lines for an extended perlou, over a mont at the absolute least, will almost gudrantee that these compantes will at least have to pay attention to the backlash. this list is not exhaustive. but some contact points for the 4 targets are:

1. VISA:
(US + Can): +1 [8001-847-2911
US option selection for operator: 1-1-2 or 1-1-3

2. MASTERCARD:
(US): +1 (8001-307-7309
US option selection for operator: 1-1-2-2-2-1
Phone (outside US): 1-636-722-7111

3. STRIPE:
(Headquarters): +118881 963-8955
(France): +33 805-11-19-67
Stripe: complaints@stripe.com

4. PAYPAL:
(US): +1 (888)-221-1161
(outside US): 1-402-935-2050
Customer Service: +1 (877)-569-1116

WHY? On July 2025, Steam, a popular storefront to purchase games on PC, and itch.io, a storefront that sells games, comics, tools, resources and much more, have recently delisted several NSFW games, after the group Collective Shout published an open letter to payment processors such as Visa, MasterCard, PayPal, and more. As a result of this letter, payment processors have strongarmed Valve and itch.io into enforcing restrictive new TOS policies on what kind of content their platforms can host and sell. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe and Paypal have been censoring free speech and legal business on the internet for TOO LONG. Their most recent targets are Steam and Itch.io, but they have also been pressuring websites like Pixiv, Patreon, Fansly, Onlyfans and MORE for years, applying draconian standards for what kind of adult/pornographic content platiorms and their users can host and sell. If we as consumers and creators want to regain ground on this issue, we have to make our voice heard. HOW? BOMBARD THEM WITH PHONE CALLS Collective Shout, the organization that lobbied to have Steam and Itch.io change their TOS, did so with only around 1000 phone calls. Visa and MC have backed down from pressuring Onlyians to remove adult content entirely due to public backlash. Clogging their phone lines for an extended perlou, over a mont at the absolute least, will almost gudrantee that these compantes will at least have to pay attention to the backlash. this list is not exhaustive. but some contact points for the 4 targets are: 1. VISA: (US + Can): +1 [8001-847-2911 US option selection for operator: 1-1-2 or 1-1-3 2. MASTERCARD: (US): +1 (8001-307-7309 US option selection for operator: 1-1-2-2-2-1 Phone (outside US): 1-636-722-7111 3. STRIPE: (Headquarters): +118881 963-8955 (France): +33 805-11-19-67 Stripe: complaints@stripe.com 4. PAYPAL: (US): +1 (888)-221-1161 (outside US): 1-402-935-2050 Customer Service: +1 (877)-569-1116

Cheat Sheet v.2

nothing from the prior version is incorrect, but ive made it a little easier to read, plus included a bit more helpful information

imgur link: imgur.com/a/wWaLY2i

more comprehensive info can be found here:
stop-paypros.neocities.org
yellat.money

MAKE YOUR CALLS!!!

27.07.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 9320    πŸ” 7725    πŸ’¬ 84    πŸ“Œ 221

If an individual offering consensual nudes of themself on OnlyFans is considered β€œillicit” but a program generating nudes of women without their consent is fine, the powers that be have made their priorities clear. And they’re the same as they ever were.

11.08.2025 01:51 β€” πŸ‘ 5752    πŸ” 2974    πŸ’¬ 20    πŸ“Œ 14

If you have ever wanted to yell directly at a Mastercard CEO: do it!! do it NOW

07.08.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1406    πŸ” 1227    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Don't let Mastercard breathe without them tripping into an article about it

09.08.2025 01:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1111    πŸ” 625    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This bill would criminalize pornography by legally redefining what it means to be obscene.

Period. Full stop. No more porn legally. If you post porn whether free pics or paid vids. this affects you!

14.05.2025 00:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3788    πŸ” 2685    πŸ’¬ 197    πŸ“Œ 411

you know what would be really funny?

if people started calling MasterCard saying "I mentioned MasterCard in a Riot/Valorant/League of Legends stream and I got timed out/warned/banned. I don't understand why that would happen. Can you explain it to me?"

08.08.2025 23:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3624    πŸ” 2028    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 11

Mastercard has reached the stage of desperately trying to gag people for saying bad things about them

WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WORKING

08.08.2025 20:20 β€” πŸ‘ 3418    πŸ” 2004    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 14

This is not how corporations respond to an ineffective protest. This is how they respond to a protest that they would like to have go away.

So don't let it go away. Keep it going.

In fact, Streissand Effect this shit. Call attention to how much they want this to go away.

08.08.2025 20:35 β€” πŸ‘ 6640    πŸ” 4766    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 11

Great idea. Mastercard DID NOT WANT to be brought up negatively in the context of their sponsorship of Riot's esports

Weaponize that against them

09.08.2025 00:25 β€” πŸ‘ 3041    πŸ” 1869    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

Next time news about Mastercard comes out, Minun's cage comes off

Next time news about Visa comes out, we'll see Plusle.

You know what to do, girls-- give 'em reason to show themselves, keep calling and emailing and sending letters!

09.08.2025 04:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A Minun with maroon eyes, jumping up and cheering the viewer on with electric-orb pompoms. He's wearing a chastity cage. Text: "DON'T STOP NOW"

A Minun with maroon eyes, jumping up and cheering the viewer on with electric-orb pompoms. He's wearing a chastity cage. Text: "DON'T STOP NOW"

Y'know what, I'd say that it coming out that Mastercard is explicitly trying to leverage companies like Riot in order to silence us is itself enough proof that we're having an impact, that it triggers what I said earlier...

09.08.2025 04:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Riot is working with MasterCard directly to help with their censorship campaign. A weird choice from MasterCard if you ask me, but very telling that they're willing to leverage any company they can to suppress discussion of this.

Also cool to see where Riot stands. They do not have to do this.

08.08.2025 21:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1395    πŸ” 934    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 13

the fact this story is hitting si.com is fucking huge

mastercard just slammed a mallet against their own balls while shitting the bed

09.08.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 565    πŸ” 355    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0
A screenshot of me answering an anonymous ask on tumblr. The ask says: "damn, y'all are big mad that rape simulator 3000 isn't available anymore". My response goes: i know that it must be really easy for you to sit behind anon and feel morally superior saying this, because the nature of the media that institutions are trying to ban is NSFW and kinky,  thus making it "embarrassing" and difficult to defend. But the fact that it's easy to cast opposition in a light that presents them all as "degenerate" perverts and therefore incentivises people to take warning voices less seriously is something worth examining. Sex workers have always been canaries in the coal mine for encroaching fascism and puritanism because "protecting the kids" is a slogan that is, on paper, impossible to oppose, but always ALWAYS is the start of a slippery slope of censorship that grows to include sexual liberation, queer existence, queer joy, and transparency in queer medical help.

A screenshot of me answering an anonymous ask on tumblr. The ask says: "damn, y'all are big mad that rape simulator 3000 isn't available anymore". My response goes: i know that it must be really easy for you to sit behind anon and feel morally superior saying this, because the nature of the media that institutions are trying to ban is NSFW and kinky, thus making it "embarrassing" and difficult to defend. But the fact that it's easy to cast opposition in a light that presents them all as "degenerate" perverts and therefore incentivises people to take warning voices less seriously is something worth examining. Sex workers have always been canaries in the coal mine for encroaching fascism and puritanism because "protecting the kids" is a slogan that is, on paper, impossible to oppose, but always ALWAYS is the start of a slippery slope of censorship that grows to include sexual liberation, queer existence, queer joy, and transparency in queer medical help.

My response continues:Banning content purely because it's obscene has always been a dangerous sentiment because noone has the same parameters of what's appropriate. Trans people just existing is obscene to some. That doesn't make them more morally correct when they bang their drums for trans representation to be eradicated. You bring up "rape simulator 3000" as evidence that we need limitations on NSFW media. Okay. So what did you say when Mouthwashing was banned, a game that explicitly depicted sexual assault in the context of male accountability, and moved thousands of people online? Is all art depicting anything unsavoury, no matter the intention, destined to be stripped from the internet? Are the SA victims who deal with their trauma and reclaim their bodies through SA roleplay worthy of shame and derision for not doing it in a sanitised way you approve of?

Are you truly prepared to let your government, wherever you live, decide what is suitable for you to come across online? How far would you be willing to take that? Are governments allowed to disrupt BDSM forums? Are websites educating people about appropriate knifeplay or CNC set to be wiped off the face of the earth? Or have you, in a desire to cater your own online experience, become someone who arrogantly orders for the table without asking what everyone wants to eat?

My response continues:Banning content purely because it's obscene has always been a dangerous sentiment because noone has the same parameters of what's appropriate. Trans people just existing is obscene to some. That doesn't make them more morally correct when they bang their drums for trans representation to be eradicated. You bring up "rape simulator 3000" as evidence that we need limitations on NSFW media. Okay. So what did you say when Mouthwashing was banned, a game that explicitly depicted sexual assault in the context of male accountability, and moved thousands of people online? Is all art depicting anything unsavoury, no matter the intention, destined to be stripped from the internet? Are the SA victims who deal with their trauma and reclaim their bodies through SA roleplay worthy of shame and derision for not doing it in a sanitised way you approve of? Are you truly prepared to let your government, wherever you live, decide what is suitable for you to come across online? How far would you be willing to take that? Are governments allowed to disrupt BDSM forums? Are websites educating people about appropriate knifeplay or CNC set to be wiped off the face of the earth? Or have you, in a desire to cater your own online experience, become someone who arrogantly orders for the table without asking what everyone wants to eat?

got a bit carried away answering an anon about the recent wave of censorship hitting nsfw games and art, but i think i got my point across.

08.08.2025 06:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1155    πŸ” 471    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image Post image SCREEN ACT: 
-full age verification. (biometric scans, ID uploads, background checks)

-Deeply unsafe for personal and data privacy. Security/data breaches are rampant, and uploading so much sensitive data to every single we site is just asking for mass ID theft. 

-id verification is much, much harder on small websites than larger ones, creating a chilling effect and stifling speech for anyone that isnt a massive corporation

-draw comparison to UK's OSA [online safety act] and the backlash it is receiving

SCREEN ACT: -full age verification. (biometric scans, ID uploads, background checks) -Deeply unsafe for personal and data privacy. Security/data breaches are rampant, and uploading so much sensitive data to every single we site is just asking for mass ID theft. -id verification is much, much harder on small websites than larger ones, creating a chilling effect and stifling speech for anyone that isnt a massive corporation -draw comparison to UK's OSA [online safety act] and the backlash it is receiving

KOSA: 
-creates "duty of care,” meaning that tech companies and platform giants would be required to take steps to prevent potentially harmful encounters, such as posts about eating disorders and instances of online bullying, from impacting minors.

-who gets to decide what is or is not "unsafe for minors"? Especially under the current administration

-it will block access to important info minors could use to keep themselves safe or advocate for themselves.  Ex: sex ed. 

-the vague nature of the bill will almost certainly be used to target LGBT content under the guise of "protecting children"

KOSA: -creates "duty of care,” meaning that tech companies and platform giants would be required to take steps to prevent potentially harmful encounters, such as posts about eating disorders and instances of online bullying, from impacting minors. -who gets to decide what is or is not "unsafe for minors"? Especially under the current administration -it will block access to important info minors could use to keep themselves safe or advocate for themselves. Ex: sex ed. -the vague nature of the bill will almost certainly be used to target LGBT content under the guise of "protecting children"

CONGRATS SOLDIER, we've hit 2 weeks of solid #SaveSpeech pressure! Youre doing a great job! Reward yourself!

And keep on calling/mailing!

stop-paypros.neocities.org
yellat.money

www.congress.gov/members/find...

07.08.2025 17:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2667    πŸ” 2429    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 33
Post image Post image

🎨 Drawing incentive to get my followers to call and email payment processors TODAY!

A big push towards censorship is here and it’s now or never!

⭐️ Reply/DM saying if you called TODAY, or emailed, which company, and include your kinks/interests!

I’ll draw something based on the replies I get. :3

07.08.2025 17:24 β€” πŸ‘ 84    πŸ” 51    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0
06.08.2025 20:19 β€” πŸ‘ 786    πŸ” 449    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

Google their FAQs - start the call off with one of them and take it to the end of that long road - then when they ask if you need anything else - bring up the censorship.

06.08.2025 12:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1668    πŸ” 1271    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 3
28.07.2025 03:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1225    πŸ” 1076    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 7

I think it needs to be pointed out as well that Visa is clearly losing money off these calls clogging their systems and still thought it was worth the money to re-train their employees/contractors. They're not scared enough to drop the issue altogether, people need to keep calling and snail-mailing.

06.08.2025 12:13 β€” πŸ‘ 4723    πŸ” 3565    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm seeing less posts about the Visa and Mastercard situation and I want to make it plain as day. You need to keep calling and bothering them, and losing them money.

Because if we lose this, they are going to cut more and more from what's available until you can only buy what they approve of.

06.08.2025 11:49 β€” πŸ‘ 7734    πŸ” 6964    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 32

Visa is now actively shutting down calls regarding their censorship and prohibition of the sale of legal product.

They clearly retrained their staff on how to deal with our calls. That doesn't happen unless there's critical mass.

KEEP IT UP. They are trying to turf the calls as fast as they can.

05.08.2025 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 4103    πŸ” 2506    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 23

@lunamann is following 20 prominent accounts