blukins

It sucks even more than I expected lol. It's kinda funny that in this expansion with charizard as the helm, it still dies to charizard discarding 2 energies, even with the ability.

Like, dachshund takes no damage from fire and it's still unplayable lol

Oh boy...

Actually i kinda do lol

So I assume the dewgong is bad?

If you see it as something like a sim game... sure? But firing someone means that person is losing their income. If someone else hires 20 people but they fire 19 it means 19 people are now in a tough spot, a company that hires 1 person but keeps them employed isn't playing with people's livelihoods

"My pet can beat your pet"

Aeropress is the way to go then, pour over is tastier imo and you could try the hario drip assist to avoid the gooseneck kettle, but it will be very hard to find preground coffee that gives you a consistent brew, aeropress can get decent coffee easily

She's looking for Ben's manager rn

I mean, even progressive Americans can be pretty ruthless to the homeless, here in mexico, despite the way data looks (homelessness is poorly documented bc of the international definition of home vs shelter) even if you end up unemployed and unhoused, it's common for a family member to take you in

He said Karen Kasparian and my mind's eye saw her go red with rage as soon as she read that

I'd focus on very intuitively controlled games (so either motion controls like wii sports or touch controls) I think mobile puzzle games like Monument Valley are a great place to start bc the goal is very simple, controls are just touching where you go and there's no timing based actions

The account is now deleted, but the username popped up in some other threads where they claim it was one of many alt accounts of a maga zionist that replies to a lot of posts in the same way

You might be right but idk, I feel like it's too selective, they don't reply to every post that mentions a two state solution, like a bot would with a keyword, it's more like they have the post ready and just reply to everything they find while searching

The reply is now deleted, but I'm baffled at how ironic it is to reply that to someone saying "let me see if I can bait a zionist by typing this" they have no sense of nuance or understanding on how they are perceived

Holy fuck, irony really isn't the strong suit of genocide defenders

I'm 100% sure some of the openAI execs must've been extremely on board with abusing copyright laws at other companies when it came to avoiding the public domain

If only the same corporate America that needs this AI shit to work out didn't also cripple the public domain, they could train models with that. Instead, they want to use the work of small artists, not even copyrighted disney stuff, mostly the work of those who can't sue them

What an extremely convenient and lenient interpretation of your own words

I see Singal be transphobic openly. I don't care to seek out a 100 follower idiot saying he should die. I don't agree with them and I rather spend my time pointing attention at someone who makes trans people's lives worse

Again, show me when I said singal should be murdered. You're the one policing how people "come off as" and I guess you can disagree with Sam Seder here and there... but if you think he's known for "yelling" you really are beyond reasoning, puts into question the "screeching" you love to bring up

Your whole thing really is just taking that goalpost as far as you can. You get laughed at and it's a crazy afront, "everyone is "screeching" and they look insane"

You use a word some people consider a slur and get called out on it, get mad for being called out

can't see how it makes YOU look?

"Breaking news: i consider 3 "screeching" people to be exactly the same as all the trans activists in this comment section"

Singal is a transphobe. Even if someone yelled at you and hurt your feefees it doesn't change that fact. Need proof? there's the Majority Report interview, actual journalism

Let's not be fools, you literally put the bar up to "does he want to mass murder trans people"? As if anything below that is permissible and being angry at it is negligible. Also for someone so concerned about the optics of activism, "retarded"? Seriously? Are we in 2005? Can you be more immature?

You... do know who you're defending right? Its not a "cancel mob", it's a guy who's been on a crusade against trans people for years. The guy got into bsky and his only immediate goal was to "troll" trans people (more like targeted harassment) and has the most blocked account in the platform wtf

Also, the biggest irony, is you saying that "every word" we say is a death threat, while you started this by critizing how the defense of trans people is "hyperbolic".

Cry me a river, you can't reply to a single thing I've said directly, only shifting the goalpost more and more

I can see irony is not your strong suit. Why should anyone take *you* seriously? Why are *you* right? Are you not demanding people attacked by Singal to just take it? Where are these death threats? You're very comfortable using the royal "you" but no one has written anything like that in this thread

First off, you didn't even bother to check who you were replying to, second, you're the one dismissing people calling out a jerk, calling their anger "hyperbole", replying like people owe you respect and being offended after they have a laugh at your expense for being ridiculous

So Singal should be treated with respect and nothing can be asked of him or the way he uses his platform. Random bluesky users tho, with less than 100 followers, should focus their energy on trump and not hurt the feelings of Jesse Singal

"You sound like a smug wounded raccoon" you do realize how stupid, specific and snobbish that analogy is? If you try to call someone else smug by being smug (adding the "whats the hyperbole these days?" Just makes you more pathetic), you just make yourself look like an angry child

Leftist infighting is way more common than you'd expect, i don't believe most of these are trolls, just people with strong opinions about "how" to get to a more left leaning political landscape (and how far they expect it to go), despite general agreements on the cause they champion

I wouldn't even go as far as to give her props for saying something as basic as this, i wouldn't say anything good or bad tbh, i just dont see the point in critizing her for tthe little i could agree with her on, instead of all the stuff i actually disagree with

When did i even say that? im saying attack the libs (including Warren btw) when they do lib shit, instead of purity testing, yes she's a capitalist pig, but saying that when she votes for an oil subsidy instead of when she says "billionares bad", is a better chance to push a leftist message