Jesse G Meyer PhD's Avatar

Jesse G Meyer PhD

@j-my-sci.bsky.social

Omics and data science. Opinions are my own and do not reflect my employer

764 Followers  |  531 Following  |  183 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  1.7681

Latest posts by j-my-sci.bsky.social on Bluesky

First time seeing a celebrity in LA - didnt notice but people were taking photos and shaking their hand

03.08.2025 19:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

August marks the 5 year anniversary of starting our lab. What a wild ride. Thanks to all our trainees, mentors, collaborators and funders. Here's to another five years

02.08.2025 18:31 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From Articles to Code: On-Demand Generation of Core Algorithms from Scientific Publications Maintaining software packages imposes significant costs due to dependency management, bug fixes, and versioning. We show that rich method descriptions in scientific publications can serve as standalon...

Stop πŸ‘ building πŸ‘ python/RπŸ‘ packages!

we show that well described methods in academic papers can serve as the specification for an LLM to create methods on demand. This can serve to reduce package maintenance while ensuring accessibility in any programming language

arxiv.org/abs/2507.22324

02.08.2025 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
PSCS: Unified Sharing of Single-Cell Omics Data, Analyses, and Results Single-cell omics data analyses are complicated to design and difficult to distribute or reproduce. We present a web platform that enables no-code analysis pipeline design, computing, and the sharing ...

If you are doing single cell data analysis please check out our new manuscript in JPR:

PSCS: Unified Sharing of Single-Cell Omics Data, Analyses, and Results | Journal of Proteome Research pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

02.08.2025 17:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Human protein interactome structure prediction at scale with Boltz-2 In humans, protein-protein interactions mediate numerous biological processes and are central to both normal physiology and disease. Extensive research efforts have aimed to elucidate the human protei...

Human protein interaction prediction at scale www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

12.07.2025 02:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I switched from running six days per week to four days running 5 miles per day and two days vinyasa flow yoga. Great synergy between strength and stretch of yoga makes the running much easier

09.07.2025 13:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I love this as an intuition about why we cannot interpret distance in umap space

08.07.2025 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We put flank steak in the crock pot with tomato and peppers and onion and wow I've never had flank steak before

05.07.2025 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Guess which month I gave three presentations and had two NIH proposals due

01.07.2025 13:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Going to be really hard to finish writing this R01 resubmission next week now that I have to report for jury duty screening

28.06.2025 23:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Very little pain when it first goes on and completely unnoticeable after a few days

17.06.2025 14:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Stelo Wearable Glucose Biosensor | Stelo by Dexcom | Stelo by Dexcom Stelo is the first over the counter glucose biosensor (OTC CGM) available without a prescription, suitable for people with type 2 diabetes not on insulin.

You can get these from Amazon $100 for a pair that each last 15 days Stelo Wearable Glucose Biosensor | Stelo by Dexcom | Stelo by Dexcom www.stelo.com?utm_source=g...

17.06.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The health monitoring technology we have available is incredible - reducing blood sugar spikes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is immediately brining my resting heart rate down

17.06.2025 12:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Indeed I haven't gone over 140 yet, but a bit scared to try.

I was surprised to see a spike this morning during fasted cardio. Apparently that is the adrenaline.

Fascinating to learn exactly how I respond to various foods and behaviors

15.06.2025 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did you know you can buy a continuous glucose monitor for $50 that lasts 15 days? Not diabetic but I got one for research and it's changing my life. Highly recommended. Naturally next step is trying ketosis. Keto flu starting now

15.06.2025 20:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
AttentionSmithy: A Modular Framework for Rapid Transformer Development Transformer architectures have revolutionized a broad spectrum of AI applications by leveraging attention mechanisms for parallelized and long-range sequence processing. Despite their remarkable...

πŸ“’ Exciting news! Our paper, "AttentionSmithy: A Modular Framework for Rapid Transformer Development," has been accepted at TMLR! πŸŽ‰
openreview.net/forum?id=0jh...
#AttentionSmithy #Transformer #AI #MachineLearning #TMLR #OpenReview #Bioinformatics #Genomics #NLP #NeuralArchitectureSearch

31.05.2025 13:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It does feel futile with this level of uncertainty

25.05.2025 21:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a fair point. I think partially you are saying that the outcome of review is ultimately determined by the writer and I agree with that. The way our communication is interpreted is the meaning, regardless of our intended meaning

25.05.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

For example "they didn't describe plans to benchmark" when aim 1.x and 2.x are labeled "benchmarking" followed by a long paragraph of benchmarking plans

25.05.2025 15:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes I agree if it's one sentence buried in a sea of detail. What if you have a whole subaim in each aim on the topics claimed to not be addressed?

25.05.2025 15:53 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Do you mean that people are feeling hopeless and overwhelmed so they don't invest their full energy in giving their pile of proposals a fair chance?

25.05.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think we all hope the golden rule applies here - I want reviewers to give my grants a fair complete read, so I completely read the grants I review

25.05.2025 03:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you. Accountability would require a change in rules. As far as I can tell if you complain and prove they didn't read it, it just gets reviewed again. No benefit to the writer, and no consequence to the reader

25.05.2025 03:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Any one else getting the sense that grant reviewers are reading less and less of what you write? Just got two summary statements listing a bunch of problems as not addressed when they had whole subsections devoted

24.05.2025 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Dear Researcher,
The journal sent the following message on the date of 10 March 2025.
You failed to receive this message, or intentionally you are not responding (sorry if I am wrong).
Kindly request your immediate attention to this email and respond within 24 hours to end it smoothly.

22.05.2025 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just paid for grammarly and wow it's incredible how far this has come since I tried it last

19.05.2025 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Our yard smells strongly of jasmine

19.05.2025 01:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'll send them my social security number and a check ASAP!

15.05.2025 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ˜‚ I'm sorry it was flagged spam

15.05.2025 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Greetings Meyer Jesse G,

We have genuinely emailed you quite a lot of times but received no response, so we'd like to try once more as consideration.

15.05.2025 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@j-my-sci is following 20 prominent accounts