Right, here are the guesses:
1 Manchester (pure guess, not a clue).

2 Baldoyle (Irish and Ballydoyle?)

3 Epsom (round parade ring, stand and downs in the background, or is it a mountain?)

4 Sandown (trees and steps)

1 Manchester? Pure guess...

2 Baldoyle?

4 Sandown with the steps

3 Epsom

"When a player loses possession of the ball & it goes forward, or when a player hits the ball forward with the hand or arm, or when the ball hits the hand or arm & goes forward, & the ball touches the ground or another player before the original player can catch it."

The MOs didn't see it like this

I get what you're saying, and in some cases, I agree with you. Especially when players tell me (a ref) that every deliberate knock is a yellow card.

This example isn't great, though, because it's not ruled a knock on which needs to fit the definition in the laws (see next reply).

That's why "intent" is taken out of the equation. All actions are - at the pro level - either intentional or reckless. That's why one part is whether there was a reasonable expectation to regather the ball... cos referee can't read minds.

3 Crewkerne (go with the masses and hope)

2 Doncaster

4 Fontwell

1 Cheltenham

That's why during a review for a deliberate knock on, the 1st thing checked is if it's an offence, for which the sanction is a penalty under law 11.3. Only then is the question what effect this action (determined as illegal) had. If it stops, eg, a linebreak, then the ref may use law 9.7a & show a 🟨

Why does a shirt pull in football potentially get punished the same way as a leg breaking tackle?

Because it's not only the action that's being looked at in the case of the shirt pull, but it action brings.
One is dangerous, the other is cheating/gamesmanship/deliberately infringing the laws.

The sight of the referee in England v Italy repeatedly having to run the length of the pitch to watch a replay of something was was clear and obvious on first viewing and then run back again to issue the sanction

Was hilariously unnecessary and frankly a shambles. Have 2 screens lads.

New TNT Sports gimmick to ‘make scrums sexy’ Intricacies of scrum may seem dull for some but David Flatman has become a master at making the mundane sound interesting

“If you tell the viewers that scrums are boring and too complicated, they will eventually believe you."

Spot on from Flatman.

www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/...

3 Kempton (flipped image)

1 Goodwood

(If it's not Goodwood, it's Brighton - I'm sure I've seen that picture before).

4 Epsom

I'm fairly certain that is the same image that got me my first ever podium with 3 Gatwick over on old Twitter.

2 Gatwick

Also, "Mathel in a raffle" rhymes quite nicely😂

- Family cricket sets
- Old cricket club history bats
- The local rugby club
- Other memorabilia
- Mathel Parker (not brand new, but in good nick😂)
- Branded special edition kit
- Bottles (also branded and special edition)
- Special edition bats (cheap collectables, though)
- etc

Das war 'n unglaublicher match. Rankin und Murtagh konnten sich im ersten Durchgang richtig austoben und wurden dann im zweiten von Leach und Roy ausgenommen.
Und dann Stuart Broad und Woakesy unter den Wolken Londons...
Was für ein verrücker Test!

Only took me three weeks to get here😂😂