Trump likes winners and wants their approval.
22.11.2025 03:36 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@deadcarl.bsky.social
www.deadcarl.com Writer on Clausewitz, international relations, and German history. Words in American Purpose.
Trump likes winners and wants their approval.
22.11.2025 03:36 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The Force Awakens has to be worth at least a little, no? If there was a good episode IX I think it would looked at as a mostly fine movie.
22.11.2025 03:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hard to say much without more info, but you do need at least a couple of formations with offensive capabilities for rapid response and weakening the enemy by threat of action. So the allocation makes sense, but their use is a separate question.
22.11.2025 03:29 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0It was always a pretext, those people cannot be appeased. They want to outraged and they want their outrage to make them superior. Facts will be slotted in or passed over to accomplish that.
22.11.2025 03:22 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Everyone gets stuck in traffic, no one thinks they are traffic, etc
22.11.2025 03:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Also: right is right and wrong is wrong. βIβm just a guy online, why donβt you bother the politicians instead of objecting to the wrong things Iβm sayingβ is incoherent and cowardly. Be accountable for the things you say!
22.11.2025 03:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0ok this is flat-out bad.
Mamdani needs to fire Katz tonight.
No palling around with red-brown fascism.
How is the option with 5 more people being alive not infinitely preferable over the one where 5 more people die? Those deaths donβt get less significant because other people are also dying. You know the quote about βhe who saves one lifeβ?
22.11.2025 02:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I was going to joke thatβs sheβs the grave robbing typeβ¦
22.11.2025 02:43 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is true, but I also wish these people specifically very happy βliving in a fantasy worldβ where they arenβt concerned about trying to exercise power in this one.
22.11.2025 02:09 β π 18 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Campism is just about the opposite of a contradiction with red-brownism
22.11.2025 02:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0actually I donβt think Zohran going βoh yeah me and ****Donald Trump**** have lots of the same politics something something working class!!!!1β is a particularly good sign. I think itβs actually a very worrying sign!
22.11.2025 01:04 β π 167 π 17 π¬ 37 π 3Imagine the commentary on this website if Schumer and Jeffries had exchanged friendship bracelets with Donald Trump.
22.11.2025 01:46 β π 164 π 26 π¬ 9 π 5the 4chan Jan. 6 greentext but it's MTG's entire career
22.11.2025 01:28 β π 91 π 11 π¬ 1 π 0You are not clear on opsec!
22.11.2025 01:10 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Where Charles gets it from
22.11.2025 00:17 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Whether insurance covers HRT or gay marriages are recognized are very important differences, even if, in the world of this meme, everything else were the same.
21.11.2025 23:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Youβre fighting with a position no one holds. The *only* thing being claimed is that a pro-LGBT government is preferable, all else being equal. It is the meme (that nowhere here agrees with) that claims both sides are the same (hence βall else being equalβ)
21.11.2025 23:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Not sure why youβre having a hard time comprehending this point: βmarginallyβ means life and death, so it is a very important distinction.
21.11.2025 21:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Whether I/they are right and whether itβs politically helpful are separate questions. The βbullshitβ is the substance in this case. The truth is incidental.
21.11.2025 19:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Youβre doing the thing that OP was addressing in her post: LGBTQ rights arenβt just going to drag brunches! Even if two administrations are equally bad in all other respects, whether LGBTQ people have rights is a question that in some cases is a matter of life and death.
21.11.2025 19:35 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0That too π
21.11.2025 19:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A leftist threatening to take their ball and go home elicits annoyance, not panic.
21.11.2025 19:28 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs interesting because you can almost see them as a variation of forward observers, just lessβ¦ forward
21.11.2025 19:26 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Probably worthwhile if only to prevent the βnot a single Democrat would condemn socialismβ whatsapp forwards.
21.11.2025 19:24 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Because itβs not going to divide the party. The number of people who pay attention to votes like this, have a positive view of socialism, and arenβt firmly Democratic voters/nonvoters is vanishingly small.
21.11.2025 19:22 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0The original meaning of the meme has the underlying claims that 1. Dem support is fake 2. Rhetorical support doesnβt matter. Both are transparently false, which is why the OP used her interpretation, one based on reality, where Dems are actually diverse and have beliefs.
21.11.2025 19:09 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thatβs premised on the idea that thereβs a significant group of people who say βBlack Lives Matterβ and support LGBTQ rights in a way that is totally false, which is a contradiction in terms when talking about a political party. Even if a party does nothing on policy, what they say has an impact.
21.11.2025 19:09 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβm forced to assume she slept with all these people until information to the contrary comes out
21.11.2025 18:17 β π 46 π 0 π¬ 2 π 1I said over there that lots of people want to overcomplicate the answer to "is it good to be good to LGBTQ people?" - when in fact it's pretty easy to answer.
21.11.2025 12:59 β π 33 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0