Dead Carl's Avatar

Dead Carl

@deadcarl.bsky.social

www.deadcarl.com Writer on Clausewitz, international relations, and German history. Words in American Purpose.

6,076 Followers  |  542 Following  |  6,265 Posts  |  Joined: 17.12.2023  |  2.5527

Latest posts by deadcarl.bsky.social on Bluesky

Trump likes winners and wants their approval.

22.11.2025 03:36 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Force Awakens has to be worth at least a little, no? If there was a good episode IX I think it would looked at as a mostly fine movie.

22.11.2025 03:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hard to say much without more info, but you do need at least a couple of formations with offensive capabilities for rapid response and weakening the enemy by threat of action. So the allocation makes sense, but their use is a separate question.

22.11.2025 03:29 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

It was always a pretext, those people cannot be appeased. They want to outraged and they want their outrage to make them superior. Facts will be slotted in or passed over to accomplish that.

22.11.2025 03:22 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone gets stuck in traffic, no one thinks they are traffic, etc

22.11.2025 03:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also: right is right and wrong is wrong. β€œI’m just a guy online, why don’t you bother the politicians instead of objecting to the wrong things I’m saying” is incoherent and cowardly. Be accountable for the things you say!

22.11.2025 03:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

ok this is flat-out bad.

Mamdani needs to fire Katz tonight.

No palling around with red-brown fascism.

22.11.2025 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 59    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

How is the option with 5 more people being alive not infinitely preferable over the one where 5 more people die? Those deaths don’t get less significant because other people are also dying. You know the quote about β€œhe who saves one life”?

22.11.2025 02:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I was going to joke that’s she’s the grave robbing type…

22.11.2025 02:43 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is true, but I also wish these people specifically very happy β€œliving in a fantasy world” where they aren’t concerned about trying to exercise power in this one.

22.11.2025 02:09 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Campism is just about the opposite of a contradiction with red-brownism

22.11.2025 02:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

actually I don’t think Zohran going β€œoh yeah me and ****Donald Trump**** have lots of the same politics something something working class!!!!1” is a particularly good sign. I think it’s actually a very worrying sign!

22.11.2025 01:04 β€” πŸ‘ 167    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 3

Imagine the commentary on this website if Schumer and Jeffries had exchanged friendship bracelets with Donald Trump.

22.11.2025 01:46 β€” πŸ‘ 164    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 5

the 4chan Jan. 6 greentext but it's MTG's entire career

22.11.2025 01:28 β€” πŸ‘ 91    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You are not clear on opsec!

22.11.2025 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Where Charles gets it from

22.11.2025 00:17 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whether insurance covers HRT or gay marriages are recognized are very important differences, even if, in the world of this meme, everything else were the same.

21.11.2025 23:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You’re fighting with a position no one holds. The *only* thing being claimed is that a pro-LGBT government is preferable, all else being equal. It is the meme (that nowhere here agrees with) that claims both sides are the same (hence β€œall else being equal”)

21.11.2025 23:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Not sure why you’re having a hard time comprehending this point: β€œmarginally” means life and death, so it is a very important distinction.

21.11.2025 21:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Whether I/they are right and whether it’s politically helpful are separate questions. The β€œbullshit” is the substance in this case. The truth is incidental.

21.11.2025 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You’re doing the thing that OP was addressing in her post: LGBTQ rights aren’t just going to drag brunches! Even if two administrations are equally bad in all other respects, whether LGBTQ people have rights is a question that in some cases is a matter of life and death.

21.11.2025 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

That too 😊

21.11.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A leftist threatening to take their ball and go home elicits annoyance, not panic.

21.11.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s interesting because you can almost see them as a variation of forward observers, just less… forward

21.11.2025 19:26 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably worthwhile if only to prevent the β€œnot a single Democrat would condemn socialism” whatsapp forwards.

21.11.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Because it’s not going to divide the party. The number of people who pay attention to votes like this, have a positive view of socialism, and aren’t firmly Democratic voters/nonvoters is vanishingly small.

21.11.2025 19:22 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The original meaning of the meme has the underlying claims that 1. Dem support is fake 2. Rhetorical support doesn’t matter. Both are transparently false, which is why the OP used her interpretation, one based on reality, where Dems are actually diverse and have beliefs.

21.11.2025 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s premised on the idea that there’s a significant group of people who say β€œBlack Lives Matter” and support LGBTQ rights in a way that is totally false, which is a contradiction in terms when talking about a political party. Even if a party does nothing on policy, what they say has an impact.

21.11.2025 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m forced to assume she slept with all these people until information to the contrary comes out

21.11.2025 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

I said over there that lots of people want to overcomplicate the answer to "is it good to be good to LGBTQ people?" - when in fact it's pretty easy to answer.

21.11.2025 12:59 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@deadcarl is following 19 prominent accounts