It’s only anti-wokisme if it comes from the Anti-Wokisme region of Quebec. Otherwise it’s just sparkling MAGA
03.02.2026 16:43 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@tedmccormick.bsky.social
Historian of scientific, economic and colonial projects in early modern Britain, Ireland, and the Atlantic; books http://bit.ly/3HYwNiA & http://bit.ly/3rKdAvt; http://memoriousblog.com; views mine; he/him. Montrealer in Philly, except when I’m in Montreal
It’s only anti-wokisme if it comes from the Anti-Wokisme region of Quebec. Otherwise it’s just sparkling MAGA
03.02.2026 16:43 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0people will sell jars full of bits of the White House ballroom like they did with the Berlin Wall
01.02.2026 23:49 — 👍 13 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0there are going to be a whole lot of cathartic demolitions when he’s gone
01.02.2026 23:43 — 👍 18 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0ah. Tbh I’m impressed by how many used bookstores are still going concerns here
01.02.2026 23:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0for my second book: two pencils
that’s right I’m taking the global turn
I am going to create [a reading] that is so [against the grain]
01.02.2026 23:10 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0got all kinds of time for mezzohistories
01.02.2026 22:36 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s 2026. Oceans rise. Storms descend. War looms. Every history is a microhistory. Every book is a novel
01.02.2026 22:36 — 👍 22 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Law and Order: Tactical Bibliography Unit
01.02.2026 22:31 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is it new? It’s been here longer than I have, that’s all I know
01.02.2026 22:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The Universe: a microhistory
01.02.2026 22:26 — 👍 28 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0A table of books advertised as “microhistories,” which are in fact just books with a specific subject
A table of books advertised as “microhistories,” which are in fact just books with a specific subject
I am losing my mind
01.02.2026 22:18 — 👍 74 🔁 9 💬 9 📌 1the correct thing to do is to respond to the first event of a given type when it happens and then remind others that you did so with each new iteration. granted this is tricky to get right. standing as we are in the ceaseless flow of time. but the rewards are also entirely online and intensely small
01.02.2026 21:54 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0oh, so you’re *just noticing* this event that happened today? I assume without either looking or asking that you have never noticed earlier events of a similar type, as I have
01.02.2026 21:47 — 👍 23 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0what. so it’s academic fraud to have friends now?
01.02.2026 00:50 — 👍 18 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Don’t think of generative AI as a plagiarism tool. Think of it as a knowledgeable friend!
❌ “The plagiarism tool researched and wrote this paper for me”
✅ “My friend researched and wrote this paper for me”
👍👍👍
I don’t know if anyone’s written on this but, particularly in light of generative AI, it would be interesting to look at the effects on learning, pedagogy, shared governance, and institutional transparency of that much older enemy among us, the PowerPoint slide
31.01.2026 20:07 — 👍 17 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0It is fitting that the US edition of concentration camps are going to be situated in disused warehouses (former data centres?): www.bloomberg.com/news/feature...
30.01.2026 16:31 — 👍 58 🔁 26 💬 3 📌 8It’s bad enough being run by people who mean you harm, but what’s worse is that they can’t even be adults about it
31.01.2026 20:01 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I want to make a joke about how the future of academia is stored in the balls but I’m too sad
31.01.2026 19:58 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The second part of the document discusses a separate meeting on May 24, 2024, named the Strategy Session for Senior Leaders. At this session, there was an activity in which participants were given balls that represented university resources and were asked to allocate their balls across bins corresponding to different disciplines, including social sciences, health, science and engineering, and arts and humanities. The exercise showed a shift in prioritization away from the social sciences and arts and humanities towards health, while allocations to science and engineering remained unchanged. During this exercise, two of the groups declined to participate, putting their balls to the side and not into any of the bins.
I am extremely not kidding
31.01.2026 19:56 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I have a generalised version of this - while there are specific exceptions, it just feels like a _huge_ proportion of the American conservative movement revealed themselves to not really care about anything? Like, nothing concrete at least. It's all just vague ressentiments around Gender and Race.
31.01.2026 09:42 — 👍 806 🔁 127 💬 39 📌 18if I’m not mistaken, it evolved into the 2023 film Five Nights at Freddy’s
31.01.2026 14:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0it’s all just fodder for future iconoclasts, may as well pile it on
31.01.2026 13:43 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0have to admit 250 is a nice round number, v user-friendly periodization
31.01.2026 13:36 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I hope it includes an allegorical figure for each of the wars he’s stopped and also each of the wars he’s threatened to start. Maybe throw an angel weeping over the Bowling Green Massacre in there someplace
31.01.2026 13:33 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Washington-a-Lago intensifies
31.01.2026 13:31 — 👍 23 🔁 4 💬 5 📌 0perhaps we as a society have simply transcended the need to be good at things
31.01.2026 00:11 — 👍 21 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0