Anna Lena Kahle

🚨 Deadline tomorrow! 🚨

We have made public #openscience materials from the Münster Center for Open Science, specifically flyers and cheatsheets on #OpenAccess, #OpenData, and #Preregistration. Flyers are already on Zenodo, Cheatsheets will follow: zenodo.org/communities/muecos/ and lukasroeseler.github.io/MueCOS-Infom...

🫶By joining our team, you won’t just design curriculum — you’ll shape how thousands of scientists learn to do rigorous, trustworthy research. Imagine seeing a student halfway across the world use materials you created to strengthen their science. That kind of impact lasts.

Apply at: buff.ly/nJxjaKd

YouTube video by ReproducibiliTea Global Mario Malički - The state of peer review today

💡 The state of peer review today / with Mario Malički @mariomalicki.bsky.social

youtu.be/pHPNuYAZ7U8?...

The U.S. Is Funding Fewer Grants in Every Area of Science and Medicine (Gift Article) A quiet policy change means the government is making fewer bets on long-term science.

An important write up from the NYT on the funding changes at the NIH.

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

Meme of cat reading a newspaper. Meme text: I should spend more time on the PYMS discord. Meme made by Nathanael Larigaldie

Our Discord just got an upgrade: we now have a dedicated meme channel 🎉

So besides sharing opportunities, events, your work, papers, and all things meta-science… there’s now room for memes and other funny content too!

Early-career and want to join? DM us!

(Meme by @nathlarigaldie.bsky.social)

Unpacking the Integration Puzzle: Overlooked Insights from Meta-Analytical Research. A Response to Berry (2025) Bierwiaczonek responds to Berry's (2025) criticism. Evidence indicates mainstream orientation, not integration, drives adaptation.

📢 The acculturation debate continues: A Direct Response to John Berry's critique was just published in advances.in/psychology!

@kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social addresses recent criticisms and reveals crucial, overlooked findings from meta-analytical evidence.
advances.in/psychology/1...

Cambridge University Press conducted a survey on 2.8k researchers - 𝟓𝟎% 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦. www-cambridge-org.stanford.idm.oclc.org/us/universit...

Great work by @abitter.bsky.social @mariogollwitzer.bsky.social @kaisassenberg.bsky.social @t-1m.bsky.social et al. on FAIR data sharing in Psychology.

They also suggest 6 simple checks that can be implemented in the editorial process to improve data FAIRness.

@kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social

Next Monday (September 29th), Jessica Rohmann (@jlrohmann.bsky.social) & Toivo Glatz will give an interesting talk on Peerspectives, a researcher-led peer-review training course @zpid.bsky.social!

Join us at ZPID or online! More info and registration here: leibniz-psychology.org/en/products/...

Kicking-off her PhD journey, @wagunyego.bsky.social talked about her initial findings capturing epistemic injustice and its relationship to trust in science. So many interesting avenues to go from here, more exciting stuff coming over the course of the next years of her dissertation. #SciReLab

Join our upcoming webinars “Peer Review and its Diversification”!

📅 15-16 October 2025 on Zoom

👉 Registration: forms.gle/1R4Y3d33W8bQ...

📄 Full programme: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

#PeerReview #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025 #metasci #academicsky

Happy to share that our #bibliometric analysis of #translational psychological treatment is now published OA in the latest issue of @apajournals.bsky.social's Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice! doi.org/10.1037/cps0...

Terminological inconsistency may threaten the progress of the field!

Excited to announce that my paper with @lpummerer.bsky.social, @sonja-utz.de & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social on conspiracy beliefs is published. We examined the relationship between conspiracy beliefs and procedural justice during the peak and decay of the pandemic.

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions - Lena Hahn, Andreas Glöckner, Mario Gollwitzer, Jens Hellmann, Jens Lange, S... Preregistering confirmatory research aims at reducing researchers’ degrees of freedom and increasing transparency to ultimately increase replicability. Yet the ...

How complete are preregistrations?

Short answer: 53% include all 6 procedural specifications

Medium answer: 🧵

Long answer: check out my publication with A. Glöckner @mariogollwitzer.bsky.social J. Hellmann, J. Lange, S. Schindler & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1177/2515...

I’m excited to share my first first-authored paper with @abitter.bsky.social in the Journal of Happiness Studies:

“The Emotional Climate of Academia: Exploring Social Media Data as an Indicator of Well‑Being.”

📖 Read it here (OA): link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Fresh of the press! I'm incredibly proud of this new paper by Kiki Vu and myself where we show how much bias is introduced when people use workarounds to test interaction hypotheses meta-analytically. Check it out: advances.in/psychology/1...

Calling all #psych researchers!📢

We’re conducting a quick survey on #preregistration and will use your feedback to improve @zpid.bsky.social's service PreReg! If you haven't participated yet, we'd greatly appreciate your feedback! Thanks!✨

Link: www.soscisurvey.de/zpid_prereg/

#OpenScience

The new version of PreReg is now available via: https://prereg-psych.org

🌟 We have launched our preregistration platform PreReg! 🌟

PreReg guides researchers through all the steps of pre-registration and now offers an even clearer structure.

#Preregistration #OpenScience #Psychology
leibniz-psychology.org/en/news/deta...

Here is a new collection of resources regarding preregistrations including a shiny app for the generation of preregistrations, help for reporting deviations, literature on preregistrations etc.
prereg-psych.org

Calling all #psych researchers!📢

We’re conducting a quick survey on #preregistration & would love your input on what features an ideal prereg platform should have. We will use your feedback to improve @zpid.bsky.social's service PreReg! Thanks!✨

Link: www.soscisurvey.de/zpid-prereg/

#OpenScience