Andreas Lundh

Science is not always as good as it appears on print in a research paper. Ready to be scared by finding nasty truths. Try out INSPECT-SR for checking the trustworthiness of trial results when you do systematic reviews.

International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.

Development of a Tool for Addressing #COIs in Trials (TACIT) for Use in Systematic Reviews

from @alundh.bsky.social @isabelleboutron.bsky.social
@cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social @upcite.bsky.social

is a PRC poster presentation

Register to stop by, ask the authors questions!

peerreviewcongress.org

All user feedback will be much appreciated.

Kerry Dwan, Lisa Bero, @mjpages.bsky.social , Rachel Richardson, @tiagogp.bsky.social , Tom Jefferson, @isabelleboutron.bsky.social, Lesley A Stewart, and Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

Thanks to all the great collaborators from the TACIT Working Group: Alastair Matheson, @angelacwebster.bsky.social, An-Wen Chan, Brett Thombs, Elie A Akl, @eturnermd1.bsky.social ermd1.bsky.social, Holger Schünemann, Jesse Berlin, Jonathan AC Sterne, Julian PT Higgins

International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.

At the peerreviewcongress.org in Chicago launching the public version of Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest (TACIT) for use in systematic reviews. If you want to know more visit www.tacit.one and try out the tool at osf.io/5fzv3

@peerreviewcongress.bsky.social
#PRC10 #COI #Trials

❓ In people with HIV, is using two different rapid tests together ('parallel testing') to diagnose TB more accurate than using only one?

An 'incremental' accuracy question: few Cochrane Reviews have yet addressed such questions.

Adult review: shorturl.at/r9CUG
Child review: shorturl.at/nSosK

Parallel use of low‐complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assays to detect tuberculosis disease in adults and adolescents living with HIV - Bjerrum, S - 2025 | Cochrane Library Select your preferred language for Cochrane reviews and other content. Sections without translation will be in English.

Happy to be involved in these two TB diagnostic reviews
www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
Great team lead by Stephanie Bjerrum, Laura Olbrich, Maunank Shah and @djaganath.bsky.social, with methodologists @yangbd.bsky.social and @tweis.bsky.social

Just received my copy of #PublishOrPerish by @maxhuibai.bsky.social. Can't wait to try it out with colleagues at @cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social

‘Mind-boggling’: US CDC orders gender-related terms cut from scientific papers Mandate from health agency is response to President Donald Trump’s crackdown on ‘woke ideology’ and has big implications for researchers.

So much for academic freedom. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Want to see if your research has had an impact on public policy?

Enter your info in SagePolicyProfiles to see the citations of your own publications in policy documents.

You get a profile page. Here is mine as an example: policyprofiles.sagepub.com/profile/5920...

Interesting. Thx for sharing

A journal that appreciates its reviewers. The annual Christmas gift with a card from the EiC. Thanks @ugeskriftet.bsky.social

The annual @cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social workshop with great presentation by Minna Johansson and other interesting talks and activities.

I'd like to join this nice company

My experience is that often a reviewer may be highly qualified to comment on some aspects, eg as content/topic expert, but has little competence on other aspects, eg methodology. Would be great if editors could assign reviewers to different roles related to the manuscript.

Important paper and great thread on psychedelics in psychiatry. youtu.be/9vQaVIoEjOM?...