Slice of Fox

“Fighting for trans liberation in Your Party”

Against Adnan Hussain and Mark serwotka I presume?

That’s what raya is isn’t it?

Well more a tinder/grindr than a Bluesky.

If Labour needed lgbt or disabled people’s votes they shouldn’t have spent a year attacking them.

Doubt we’d consider a Labour for a generation now and will talk about Labour’s policies in regard to trans people the same way we talk about Tory’s, gay people and section 28

Labour MPs: cutting disease aid would be a moral failure

Starmer: that’s precisely why I’m doing it

trans people in the media every day, the Tories and Reform continue to use them as a political football, often most damagingly in

Any other parties doing that Nadia? Maybe one in red?

I believe she would also be an economic migrant which according to oakeshott is the worst type of migrant.

Oh god can you imagine?

The bbc commissioning a rival to loose women with KJK, Joyce, stock and bindell all growling about trans people.

A Glinner biography starring James Dreyfus.

No cartoons unless all characters clearly show their junk (the forstater rule)

But similarly not a lawyer. Just cursed with remembering half details from daily mail outrage pieces.

I think it depends on the context. I believe that there’s case law that established that if someone was against ‘Muslims’ and manifested this as attacking their skin colour, language, clothing, culture, ethnicity, culture and not any beliefs then it’s racism with poor vocabulary.

I would argue perversion rather than undermining. They’re literally arguing that the EA was designed to require trans segregation and exclusion and that protecting people of colour is equal to attacking them for their skin.

I fairness I too would prefer Suzanne Moore to be locked up than her pay her licence fee.

Like ‘Trevor Phillips’ could mean anyone out there named Trevor Philips, but ‘that prick off TV Trevor Phillips’ specifies one particular Trevor Philips.

That’s why I asked Hilton specifically about the numbers of cis men taking exogenous sources of oestrogen in the studies she cited and why if the answer was zero (which it was) she was using it to make claims about the effects of transition.

She’s a shit scientist.

My god this BBC criticism report is by a man who thinks professional wrestling is a genuine competitive sport.

Which is rather ironic given GCs age demographic is nearly exclusively from those sporting blue rinses.

It sounds like the judge smells bullshit.

Which for an academic Hilton knows is either deceptive or stupid.

You cannot draw conclusions from research about a subject group not studied.

This actually causes most research GCs quote to fall apart. Particularly ones around fairness in sport quoted by Sharon “more ex husbands than GCSEs” Davies and Emma Hilton aka fondofbeetles.

Nearly every study they utilise compares cis women to cis men. They then make conclusions about trans women

Does this similarly affect the GLPs challenge?

“What do you use for contraception?”

“My bed spread of transphobe caricatures”

Note how none of them actually look like that in real life.

For a start the miserable gits are all smiling.

Yep. And no one gives a fuck unless it causes them some sort of medical difficulty.

There’s even been instances of XY women giving birth (but again don’t know how rare that really is as routine testing doesn’t occur).

I suspect the finer detail will end up being something along the lines of that there’s a mandatory period of time that needs to elapse until they will rereview.

And not that they have confidence in the EHRC.

*that

The was Venice Allen.

She was later banned from the ponds for sexually harassing strangers at the women’s pool by demanding they describe their genitalia to her.

It is actually the reason why universities don’t do self sex genotyping as experiments in undergrads for biology, biochemistry or medical degrees nowadays.

As it did throw up situations people did not expect.

Or a woman needs to be able to be pregnant…….except in the case of us post menopausal women.

It’s a binary if you ignore everything that disproves it being a binary

For example animal are a binary and are either cats or dogs if you ignore every other animal not covered in the groups of cat or dogs. Simple.

Isn’t the argument that it needs to comply with the equality act nonsense anyway?

Those in the award are not receiving any protection from the status. It’s not a service. Why does a private award need to consider the equality act in any way?

I would love to see Tommy supporters enraged at them being considered the same as ‘the Muslims’ tbh.