All of these would work I guess. My point is still that there is nothing unreconcilable about the two statements so it's not at all mind-boggling that Trump supporters buy into this narrative.

Hmm okay I understand.. honestly, sometimes I wonder why the US isn't even more dominant, given their lead in so many industries/technologies - and I can conceive a world where they are, with more favourable trade terms :)

(which doesn't mean that I think they're "terribly cheated" currently)

Not supporting the tarrifs but why should these two statements not be reconcilable?

well-deserved! ☺️

fair point 😄

One could be nitpicking that it's not the cost of *each* tonne but it's a good start and hopefully grabs attention:)

Breaking: Trump signed a new Executive Order demanding economists claiming "data available upon request" to make data available upon request.

In FFM zu sein reicht schon alleine für das Dolce Vita :)

Thrilled to see “The Economics of Inequality and the Environment” out in the Journal of Economic Literature @aeajournals.bsky.social, joint review with U.Kornek, J.Meya & L.Sager

Environmental loss & economic inequality are two key challenges of our time, but how do both relate & interact?