Chamada Aberta para Diretoria Executiva!
A Rede Brasileira de Reprodutibilidade está buscando um(a) novo(a) Diretor(a) Executivo(a) com ênfase em pesquisa e educação!
A Rede Brasileira de Reprodutibilidade está buscando um(a) novo(a) Diretor(a) Executivo(a) com ênfase em pesquisa e educação! A chamada está aberta para pesquisadores de qualquer área, com remuneração baseada na tabela de valores praticados pela FAPESP, com início em novembro/dezembro de 2025!
22.09.2025 18:30 — 👍 5 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0
No Brasil, heranças e doações estão entre as menos tributadas do mundo, com alíquotas entre 2% e 8%, contra a média de 15% na OCDE e até 55% no Japão.
14.08.2025 11:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
@filipespeck.bsky.social tesouros de Priamo? Será? No Neues Muesum, em Berlim. Um abraço para vcs do podcast Noites Gregas!
10.08.2025 10:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
My humble contribution to #Fesbe2025 at Unicamp @unicampoficial.bsky.social Grateful to be part of it!
#meta-analysis
#transcriptome
10.07.2025 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
🎯
09.07.2025 20:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
You're right. Still, the text says the reviewers can opt to be acknowledged.
19.06.2025 15:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Recognizing reviewers is great (long overdue!), but could it backfire?
1️⃣ Discourage honest critiques due to fear of backlash?
2️⃣ Might it push reviewers to go easy, just to get name recognition, lowering the rigor?
Thoughts?
19.06.2025 11:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Brandon Stell puts it powerfully - and accurately: 'We value publications more than what's inside them.'
It's not something we wanted to hear, but it's something we needed to.
18.06.2025 14:21 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Great! Will you be broadcasting it online?
16.06.2025 09:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Fechamos a carta com 187 signatários e mais de 1500 visualizações! 🤩
17.02.2025 19:23 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Belkin et al. demonstrated that male and female hearts respond differently to a preventive diet against dilated cardiomyopathy. Looks like sex matters in #cardiology, huh? See doi.org/10.1016/j.jm...
@reproducibilitea.org @redebrrepro.bsky.social @ukrepro.bsky.social
14.02.2025 18:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
A researcher measures identical mice emerging from an industrial production line.
Animal research needs a reality check. 🐭🔬
Standardized experiments with genetically identical, same-age, single-sex animals boost internal validity - but at what cost? Lack of heterogenization reduces reproducibility and real-world relevance.
#Reproducibility #AnimalResearch #Science
14.02.2025 18:18 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
Que análise sobre o voto e países soberanos na democracia moderna. Não tem jeito, o sistema precisa de atualização e o Miguel Lago finaliza com umas poucas ideias. Pena que não investiu mais nessa abordagem. Estou curioso para ler o A Construção de um Estado para o Século XXI. a.co/d/9pyveTN
21.01.2025 22:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
What do you mean by 'visual sloppiness'?
08.01.2025 12:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I suspect it's a holdover from the era of physical paper-submitted manuscripts, when high-definition figures were printed separately—almost like an archaeological relic. Sometimes we update the system but not the practices.
08.01.2025 12:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Why do journals insist on requiring figures at the end of the file?
Haven't editors reviewed enough manuscripts to realize it's much easier to check a fig. when it's near the paragraph where it is cited?
Make reviewers' lives easier - you're already not paying them!
#ScientificPublishing
#PeerReview
07.01.2025 17:37 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 2
Do you think state-funded institutes should be maintained to audit certain state-funded projects, or would changing policies to eliminate harmful incentives (such as overvaluing high-impact journals) be a more cost-effective way to improve science?
01.01.2025 12:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
Systematic reviews (SRs) are time and resource intensive, requiring approximately 1 year from protocol registration to submission for publication. Our…
Before the AI era, Clark et al. completed a full systematic review in just 2 wks by dividing the process into parts and automating them.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
I’m not naive, but this demonstrates that we can improve data synthesis with better training datasets and ethical oversight.
23.12.2024 15:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means?
Artificial intelligence could help speedily summarize research. But it comes with risks.
AI promises to speed up #meta-analysis, but not without risks. Transparency, reproducibility, and preventing misuse are key concerns. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Are we ready to trust AI to synthesize decades of science? Or will it just make a mess of the literature?
#AI #Science #Metascience
23.12.2024 15:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Advancing practical and robust approaches to research assessment globally and across all scholarly disciplines. Sign the Declaration at https://sfdora.org/sign and join the movement.
the modern peer is a scientist-led blog dedicated to making academic publishing more transparent and accessible.
Subscribe here: https://www.themodernpeer.com
And reach out if you would like to contribute with a guest post!
We found a strong correlation between effort and disappointment.
https://ko-fi.com/minorrevision <- If you are wondering how these comics are made, it is explained here. No need to have a meltdown.
Web development, data management and visualizations. Consulting services for scientific and r&d communities. https://www.researchelements.org/
noites gregas, matinal, fábrica do refrão e ciências humanas.
Flamenguista, colunista da Folha de São Paulo e comentarista (é esse o nome?) no Foro de Teresina. Autor de "PT, uma História" (Companhia das Letras, 2022).
INACTIVE
Unofficial account of the Tour de France & Tour de France Femmes, official tweets are manually posted here by @coldutourmalet.me
🙎♂️📅 #TDF2025 July 5 - July 27
🙎♀️📅 #TDFF2025 July 26 - August 3
🙎♂️💛🏆 Tadej Pogačar 🇸🇮
🙎♀️💛🏆 CURRENTLY: Kim Le Court 🇲🇺
Head of Community at PREreview.org.
Working to make the scholarly research eco-system more equitable.
Previously involved in building community at Crossref and INASP.
The Institute for Replication (I4R) works to improve the credibility of science by promoting and conducting reproductions and replications.
i4replication.org
Ciência ao alcance de todos! Acesse nossaciencia.com
PREreview is a free and open platform for the crowdsourcing of #preprint reviews, a resource center, and a convener. Working to make science and scholarship more equitable, transparent, and collaborative.
To learn more, visit: https://linktr.ee/prereview
Meta-researcher, Clinician, Professor at Rennes University, Senior member at Institut Universitaire de France, affiliate at METRICStanford. ORCID: 0000-0003-3760-3801
Posts are my own.
Website: https://restores.univ-rennes.fr/
Cardiologist, MD, PhD | Head, Clinical Trials Unit (ARO), Hosp. Moinhos de Vento 🇧🇷 | Professor, Postgrad Cardiology, UFRGS 🇧🇷 | Fellowship, TIMI Study Group, BWH/HMS 🇺🇸 | Lipids, Trials, Cardiology
Intervals.icu analyzes your rides, runs, swims and other activities. It provides basic and advanced analytics and planning in an easy to use web interface.
Single-figure peer-reviewed and curator-vetted articles for getting your data out. Published by our Caltech Library. Model and non-model organism data.
The #Predatory Journals List. Also in https://x.com/PredatoryReport
Website: https://predatoryjournals.org/
A maior produtora de podcasts com DNA jornalístico do Brasil.
Conheça as vantagens do Clube da Novelo: radionovelo.com.br/clube
Current: PhD in Registered Reports @ Cardiff
Interests: metascience / science / medicine / technology / psychology / open knowledge / human rights / cats
Previous: @okfn.bsky.social OpenTrials @senseaboutsci.bsky.social AllTrials
Web: https://benmeg.com