Absolutely vulgar.
10.08.2025 19:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@moodyjudyblue.bsky.social
WTF? None of this is normal! Just bring me sourdough toast and coffee. No DMs. Progressive. Do not obey in advance. Fasten your seat belts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Absolutely vulgar.
10.08.2025 19:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If you throw a sex toy at women, you are a sex offender and you should be arrested and put on a list as such.
08.08.2025 14:40 — 👍 274 🔁 47 💬 14 📌 1Wild how quickly they went from 'what rights don't you have' to 'lol we've taken all your rights'
08.08.2025 13:19 — 👍 981 🔁 195 💬 18 📌 3FUCK OFF MSNBC. Total failure.
06.08.2025 19:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well, they are Patriot Front, so….
06.08.2025 19:17 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🤡
02.08.2025 17:49 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0From the no shit dept care of NYT: "One of the primary goals of the Trump administration’s tariffs have been increasing U.S. manufacturing jobs. But in recent months, we’ve seen manufacturing jobs fall, including by 11,000 positions in the July data released today."
01.08.2025 16:35 — 👍 407 🔁 98 💬 29 📌 7This is unconscionable. There are far too many aspects of this treatment that are unacceptable and inhumane. But it’s hard not to focus on how right-wing ideologues built an entire anti-trans campaign on the premise of protecting women & girls in bathrooms.
Where are they?
This past week, the 79-year-old president announced he’s ended six wars (some that have been going on for centuries), asserted that windmills drive whales insane, called for Beyoncé to be prosecuted, claimed Obama committed treason and complained a convicted pedophile “stole” teenage girls from him.
31.07.2025 12:44 — 👍 8189 🔁 2431 💬 388 📌 252Why did he have teenage spa workers in the first place?
31.07.2025 16:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Why doesn’t MSM ask him why he had a minor girl working at his spa in the first place?
31.07.2025 15:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You have blood on your hands. I voted for Katie!
29.07.2025 16:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's simply amazing to me that the U.S. spent 70 years (1945-2015) constructing a post-WW2 military, economic, and social world order to its liking, only to turn around and decide it was actually the victim of this order the entire time.
28.07.2025 13:59 — 👍 3754 🔁 905 💬 103 📌 67Turns out the best way to make a deal to get out of your child sex trafficking conviction is to have one of your clients get elected president.
26.07.2025 01:30 — 👍 23097 🔁 5956 💬 492 📌 178Exactly!
21.07.2025 16:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“What America is witnessing is a remaking of the American presidency into something closer to a dictatorship,” Peter M. Shane argues. That project is the work of Chief Justice John Roberts:
21.07.2025 12:27 — 👍 2152 🔁 850 💬 183 📌 115Tone policing is fun.
20.07.2025 22:59 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Funny how all that protect women’s sports energy went out the window as soon as WNBA players showed up with T-shirts bringing awareness to the lack of financial equity they have in their league.
20.07.2025 16:25 — 👍 10237 🔁 2339 💬 113 📌 69Turns out “progressive” men hate it when they are called out on their misogyny. Makes them turn right. 🤷♀️
19.07.2025 08:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Misogyny wrapped in a progressive package is still misogyny. Ewww.
19.07.2025 08:30 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0That won’t change anything. It’ll end up at SCROTUS who will allow the gerrymandering. Though, they still have to file suit, maybe slow it down through the mid terms.
15.07.2025 18:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Supreme Court said it was unlawful for the Biden administration to forgive student loans because it lacked congressional authority but has no problem with the Trump administration gutting the entire Department of Education without congressional approval. This is a lawless court.
14.07.2025 22:54 — 👍 2383 🔁 674 💬 30 📌 18thinking about the dems who said we can't abolish ICE as the Department of Education gets wiped off the map
14.07.2025 21:34 — 👍 21651 🔁 5311 💬 59 📌 232…
13.07.2025 15:21 — 👍 5709 🔁 1871 💬 155 📌 104WTF? His security details are also masked? That’s some serious bullshit.
13.07.2025 18:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“Oh yeah, you want to get rid of the police. Well what about this [insert violent crime the cops didn’t prevent], bet you’d want police then [to not stop the crime].”
13.07.2025 13:03 — 👍 511 🔁 85 💬 20 📌 10I’m sure if Joe Biden had threatened to strip James Woods of his citizenship it’d have been no big deal
12.07.2025 14:37 — 👍 1403 🔁 158 💬 33 📌 4another perfect Rolling Stone headline: MAN AFRAID TO RIDE SUBWAY NAMED HEAD OF NASA Trump tapped Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to lead the space program on an interim basis
Rolling Stone continues to teach a masterclass in headline writing www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
10.07.2025 18:21 — 👍 9665 🔁 2426 💬 122 📌 100Three very loathsome men. I will never watch but I’m glad you’re there.
12.07.2025 15:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Infographic titled “One Court, Two Standards” compares how the Supreme Court used emergency powers to rule on lower-court injunctions against the Biden and Trump administrations. Two panels show: • Biden Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 21 cases. All 21 cases are represented by red squares, indicating that 0% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS. • Trump Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 86 cases. 66 green squares and 20 red squares show that 77% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS. Key takeaway box below reads: “Using its ‘shadow docket,’ the Supreme Court granted emergency relief to lift 77% of lower-court injunctions against the Trump administration. It lifted 0% of those against the Biden administration.” Sources and notes below include: CourtListener data through July 7, 2025; analysis by Adam Bonica.
The Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” has cast very different shadows depending on which party holds the White House.
When lower courts blocked Trump admin policies, SCOTUS intervened on an emergency basis to lift those orders in 77% of cases.
For the Biden administration, that number was 0%.