Mariecia Fraser's Avatar

Mariecia Fraser

@uplandresources.bsky.social

Professor; animal science; upland farming; land use; grazing ecology; nutrient use efficiency; GHG emissions. Head, Pwllpeiran Upland Research Centre, Aberystwyth University. πŸ‘β˜˜οΈπŸπŸ‚πŸŒ±πŸ¦™πŸŒ³

300 Followers  |  170 Following  |  70 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024  |  1.9855

Latest posts by uplandresources.bsky.social on Bluesky

Text: LTE Site of the Week-Brignant Plots, Wales. Photo of 3 sheep grazing. Text: Running since 1994, Mariecia Fraser, University of Aberystwyth. University. Icons for grassland and grazing.

Text: LTE Site of the Week-Brignant Plots, Wales. Photo of 3 sheep grazing. Text: Running since 1994, Mariecia Fraser, University of Aberystwyth. University. Icons for grassland and grazing.

#BrignantPlots, #Pwllpeiran #Wales is the #LTESiteOfTheWeek.

Mariecia Fraser @uplandresources.bsky.social is testing the effectiveness of reducing different types of #LandManagement on #grassland.

bit.ly/Brignant
@ibers.bsky.social @aberuni.bsky.social 🌎

30.07.2025 12:56 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Farmers making the most of the weekend weather β˜€οΈπŸ₯΅ Upland pasture closed up in April and only harvested now = good for biodiversity. Don’t be fooled by the wrap! #haylage #winterforage #nomowmay

14.07.2025 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Check out the dorsal line and tiger stripes 😍 With those β€˜primitive’ markings he has to be Konik, right?πŸ€” No. He’s my wonderful Highland pony; representative of just one of Britain’s many native breeds that make equally good conservation grazers #conservationgrazing #ponies

29.06.2025 16:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Alpacas out on different types of grassland πŸ¦™ #improvedpasture #SNRG #alpacas

27.06.2025 11:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
My letter screenshot. Dear Sallie Bailey.
I am really very sorry, but your new peat map, the England Peat Map (EPM) is deeply flawed and should be taken offline as soon as possible, and all conclusions drawn from any of its data should be removed from public discourse and decision making.
I have raised this matter on social media with Natural England, Tony Juniper, Steve Reed, and Mary Creagh, and have not received anything back so I am now bringing it officially to your door.
While I fully understand how so many massive mistakes can have happened during the making of the map, I cannot understand how it was launched without the mistakes being flagged up and fixed. I can only come to the uncomfortable conclusion that within the organisation there is no space for mistakes to be made, aired without blame, and learnt from. I worry that a culture of bluster and sweeping issues aside is prevalent. Did nobody speak up about the obvious mistakes? Are people still truly sticking to the party line of 'a few minor errors' when so many large errors are easy to see?
If this is not the case, and the maps flaws are due to a systemic lack of attention to detail or ground truthing then you have an easier job when it comes to fixing the issues. With a bit of time and some extra work we can have a map that does want it was supposed to do. As it stands even the original purpose of the map, (of helping people find the peat grips so they can be fixed), does not work, let alone the additional layers and uses.
The mistakes so large and so scattergun it is impossible to find a work around when using the map. If every river was mapped as peat, then you could accept that, or if all rocks were deep peat, but as it is just some, you never know what's good and what's not.

My letter screenshot. Dear Sallie Bailey. I am really very sorry, but your new peat map, the England Peat Map (EPM) is deeply flawed and should be taken offline as soon as possible, and all conclusions drawn from any of its data should be removed from public discourse and decision making. I have raised this matter on social media with Natural England, Tony Juniper, Steve Reed, and Mary Creagh, and have not received anything back so I am now bringing it officially to your door. While I fully understand how so many massive mistakes can have happened during the making of the map, I cannot understand how it was launched without the mistakes being flagged up and fixed. I can only come to the uncomfortable conclusion that within the organisation there is no space for mistakes to be made, aired without blame, and learnt from. I worry that a culture of bluster and sweeping issues aside is prevalent. Did nobody speak up about the obvious mistakes? Are people still truly sticking to the party line of 'a few minor errors' when so many large errors are easy to see? If this is not the case, and the maps flaws are due to a systemic lack of attention to detail or ground truthing then you have an easier job when it comes to fixing the issues. With a bit of time and some extra work we can have a map that does want it was supposed to do. As it stands even the original purpose of the map, (of helping people find the peat grips so they can be fixed), does not work, let alone the additional layers and uses. The mistakes so large and so scattergun it is impossible to find a work around when using the map. If every river was mapped as peat, then you could accept that, or if all rocks were deep peat, but as it is just some, you never know what's good and what's not.

There appears to have been no cross referencing with other maps within the
EPM let alone elsewhere in the organisation. Quite why I do not know. The data is there, priority habitats and living England mapping along with the basic maps available showing road networks and waterways could have been used to double check the data, yet they have not been.
The obvious mistake I have found so far are:
Almost all the limestone pavement in England mapped as peat including SSSI areas and the area in the launch video, malham tarn, one of the most studied areas in the country for ecology and geology.
As far as I can see every Dartmoor tor is mapped as peat, along with large areas of rocks and shallow mineral soil surrounding the tors.
Some reservoirs mapped as peat, including Colliford, Cornwall second largest, holding 28,000 mega litres of water.
Shadows of trees, hedges and walls mapped as bare peat across broad sweeps of landscapes to such an extent that it is obvious what time of day the original images were taken
Rivers mapped as peat
China clay works mapped as peat
Known SSSI bogs not mapped as peat
Alluvial river deposits mapped as peat
The vegetation layer mapping known woods (on the tree inventory map) as open bog vegetation
Large areas of semi-improved grassland shown as Eriophorum Bog
Bracken mapped as molinia bog at a vast scale
Roads mapped as peat gullies again and again
Ridge and furrow field systems seen as peat grips along with other archeology mapped as damaged peat
Natural streams and rivers mapped as peat gullies
And

There appears to have been no cross referencing with other maps within the EPM let alone elsewhere in the organisation. Quite why I do not know. The data is there, priority habitats and living England mapping along with the basic maps available showing road networks and waterways could have been used to double check the data, yet they have not been. The obvious mistake I have found so far are: Almost all the limestone pavement in England mapped as peat including SSSI areas and the area in the launch video, malham tarn, one of the most studied areas in the country for ecology and geology. As far as I can see every Dartmoor tor is mapped as peat, along with large areas of rocks and shallow mineral soil surrounding the tors. Some reservoirs mapped as peat, including Colliford, Cornwall second largest, holding 28,000 mega litres of water. Shadows of trees, hedges and walls mapped as bare peat across broad sweeps of landscapes to such an extent that it is obvious what time of day the original images were taken Rivers mapped as peat China clay works mapped as peat Known SSSI bogs not mapped as peat Alluvial river deposits mapped as peat The vegetation layer mapping known woods (on the tree inventory map) as open bog vegetation Large areas of semi-improved grassland shown as Eriophorum Bog Bracken mapped as molinia bog at a vast scale Roads mapped as peat gullies again and again Ridge and furrow field systems seen as peat grips along with other archeology mapped as damaged peat Natural streams and rivers mapped as peat gullies And

The peat depth and vegetation layers are wrong across so much or the map that it is unusable as a resource.
This list is not exhaustive.
So, in short:
areas that Natural England know are not peat mapped as peat, areas that Natural England know are peat not mapped. Infrastructure like the road network ignored and other open source maps not cross referenced.
The scale of the errors clearly show that any data taken from the EPM cannot be correct up to and including the GHG emissions figure and the restoration potential figures, and any site specific or landscape scale decisions will be made much harder by the maps bad data.
It begs the questions, firstly why is the map still online? A lightweight disclaimer, put up three days after the launch, in no way mitigates the potential harm this map could cause.
Another question about the workplace practices around normal human errors, and how the whole organisation deals with them are also starting to become more pressing as time goes on. If this is allowed to happen what else is equally wildly wrong? Can any of the data coming out of Natural England be trusted?
As I said, 1 am very sorry about all of this, especially after everyone's hard work on the project, but the fact remains that the new England Peat Map is badly wrong and needs to be taken offline.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter

The peat depth and vegetation layers are wrong across so much or the map that it is unusable as a resource. This list is not exhaustive. So, in short: areas that Natural England know are not peat mapped as peat, areas that Natural England know are peat not mapped. Infrastructure like the road network ignored and other open source maps not cross referenced. The scale of the errors clearly show that any data taken from the EPM cannot be correct up to and including the GHG emissions figure and the restoration potential figures, and any site specific or landscape scale decisions will be made much harder by the maps bad data. It begs the questions, firstly why is the map still online? A lightweight disclaimer, put up three days after the launch, in no way mitigates the potential harm this map could cause. Another question about the workplace practices around normal human errors, and how the whole organisation deals with them are also starting to become more pressing as time goes on. If this is allowed to happen what else is equally wildly wrong? Can any of the data coming out of Natural England be trusted? As I said, 1 am very sorry about all of this, especially after everyone's hard work on the project, but the fact remains that the new England Peat Map is badly wrong and needs to be taken offline. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter

It’s been a whole month since the peat map of England was launched!

It’s still very wrong
And it’s still online

So I’ve written a open letter to @naturalengland.bsky.social

I am starting to worry that massive mistakes are just a thing with the whole organisation.

What else is wildly wrong?

16.06.2025 07:33 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4
Preview
Desert Deserts are areas that receive very little precipitation.

I can vouch that the rainfall in mid Wales most definitely exceeds 25cm!
education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/des...

09.06.2025 21:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
There’s an invader turning huge swathes of Britain into deserts – and these dead zones are spreading | George Monbiot Vast areas of land are now dominated by one species – purple moor-grass – and good luck with seeing a bird or insect there. How do we revive these habitats, asks Guardian columnist George Monbiot

Whatever happened to nuance?? Dog whistle articles like this only undermine progress towards finding multi-actor consensus on future land management. Hyperbole is no substitute for knowledge.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

09.06.2025 21:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Unexpected visitor at the office today 😯 #bat

30.05.2025 10:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
The number of studies reporting the occurrence of each deer species, together with the different effects on woody vegetation that were studied. Note that the numbers in this matrix add up to more than the total number of studies (n = 455), as many studies reported more than one deer species present and more than one effect category.

The number of studies reporting the occurrence of each deer species, together with the different effects on woody vegetation that were studied. Note that the numbers in this matrix add up to more than the total number of studies (n = 455), as many studies reported more than one deer species present and more than one effect category.

High deer densities are one of the main challenges in temperate forest restoration and management. But not all deer are the same! In this review we consider the evidence for their impacts on woody vegetation ->

26.05.2025 08:08 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
A peat bog on a sunny day with cotton flowers in the foreground, a pool reflecting the blue sky and peatlands in the distance.

A peat bog on a sunny day with cotton flowers in the foreground, a pool reflecting the blue sky and peatlands in the distance.

We are looking for people to work with us to restore our precious peatlands - elanvalley.org.uk/about/careers/

17.05.2025 08:54 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

First cria of the year this morning ☺️ She arrived quickly when no one was watching and was up and about in no time πŸ‘ #alpaca #newarrival #cria #cute

16.05.2025 14:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

And we’re off! Kidding 2025 is underway #cute #goats

13.05.2025 06:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Good to have some of our research from Bronydd Mawr included in this new report πŸ‘ #mixedgrazing #SNRG #sustainable #grassland
sustainablefoodtrust.org/wp-content/u...

12.05.2025 11:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

For various reasons we opted to go for a late lambing with the Beulahs, which has tied in perfectly with this amazing weather πŸ’― Just a few stragglers left now.

05.05.2025 10:27 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Cuckoos calling all across the valley and the cuckoo flowers are out πŸ™‚ #lovewhereyoulive

02.05.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The swallows and house martins are back and today I heard the cuckoo for the first time πŸ’š #springhassprung

26.04.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Rewetting alongside biochar and sulphate addition mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and retain carbon in degraded upland peatlands Peat soils store significant amounts of carbon (C) globally, and increased C sequestration into peatlands could play a role in offsetting anthropogeni…

Interesting results from this study using mesocosms created from peat taken from our #GGRPeat demonstration site πŸ‘ #UKRI #IBERS #CO2RE
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

24.04.2025 08:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Delighted to be working with Miranda Whall on her project πŸ™‚

22.04.2025 09:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Single or twins? πŸ€” #stillsmiling #goats #spring

15.04.2025 14:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The hedges have all woken up in the last week or so #spring

13.04.2025 07:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Big areas burning at Ffair Rhos and Cwmrheidol. Last week it was Nant-y-moch on fire for days. Thankfully the one at the Arch and this one were put out quickly.

11.04.2025 07:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

We’ve been talking for years about the increased risk of wildfires due to the fuel load building up on the hills. And now there’s smoke in all directions πŸ”₯πŸ˜•

11.04.2025 06:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not long now! @ibers.bsky.social

07.04.2025 11:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Comparative Analysis of Pasture Composition: DNA Metabarcoding Versus Quadrat‐Based Botanical Surveys in Experimental Grassland Plots DNA metabarcoding offers a scalable alternative to traditional botanical surveys for monitoring plant community composition under different management regimes in experimental grassland plots. Compari...

In our latest paper we compared DNA metabarcoding and quadrat surveying as methods for determining botanical composition 🌱🧬 #BBSRC #IBERS #grassland #StapledonTrust #ResilientCrops
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

01.04.2025 13:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
March Β  : News , Aberystwyth University Peatbogs will be given a unique voice by an innovative project that seeks to portray scientific data through art.

Peatbogs will be given a unique voice by an innovative project that seeks to portray scientific data through art. β€˜When Peat Speaks’ is led by Art lecturer, Miranda Whall.

πŸ–±οΈ tinyurl.com/43ypmx4m

@co2rehub.bsky.social
#peat #peatbogs #Pwllpeiran #artandscience

24.03.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Peiran Finale - 2 years old this summer. Love his fluffy ears! 😁 #alpaca #allgrownup

22.03.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

That’s the wethers we use on experimental plots all prepped, weighed and allocated to groups ready for the field season to begin πŸ‘
#sheep #BBSRC #IBERS

21.03.2025 10:28 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Beware the Ides of March...

15.03.2025 14:12 β€” πŸ‘ 3006    πŸ” 462    πŸ’¬ 51    πŸ“Œ 29
Post image

Feeding time for the Beulah ewes and female alpacas. And another dry day! πŸ‘πŸ¦™πŸŒ€οΈ #spring #ladiesinwaiting #uplands

14.03.2025 10:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

😳 Any idea what happened??

13.03.2025 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@uplandresources is following 20 prominent accounts