Claucia Faganello's Avatar

Claucia Faganello

@claucia-faganello.bsky.social

PhD in Administration, researching public participation, transparency, social control, public policy, and policy capacity. Particularly interested in gender. Books, cooking, and cats.

224 Followers  |  654 Following  |  1 Posts  |  Joined: 08.04.2024  |  1.5187

Latest posts by claucia-faganello.bsky.social on Bluesky

Revisão Sistemática e Meta-análise Offered by Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Este curso introduz um tipo de estudo conhecido por revisão sistemática. Vamos aprender sobre ... Enroll for free.

Todo mundo que vai escrever uma tese acaba fazendo alguma revisão de literatura. Até aí, blz. Mas quase ninguém explora as potencialidades de uma revisão sistemática da literatura, principalmente nas Humanidades.

Se liga nesse curso. 0800, online e com certificado.

www.coursera.org/learn/revisa...

30.01.2025 10:08 — 👍 18    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0

Um dos lugares mais tristes e impactantes que já visitei! Memória presente das atrocidades que ocorreram no holocausto!

27.01.2025 14:33 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
My desire to be well-informed is currently at odds with my desire to remain sane. - David Sipress

My desire to be well-informed is currently at odds with my desire to remain sane. - David Sipress

You and me both.

23.01.2025 03:30 — 👍 858    🔁 134    💬 11    📌 5

Absolutely disgraceful that Routledge have given in to external pressure to "unpublish" their edited collection, Sexual Misconduct in Academia edited by Erin Pritchard and Delyth Edwards. It's terrible we have to rely on whisper networks to protect people in academia from sexual misconduct.

21.06.2024 11:19 — 👍 11    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 1

COPE position statement
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT or Large Language Models in research publications is expanding rapidly. COPE joins organisations, such as WAME and the JAMA Network among others, to state that AI tools cannot be listed as an author of a paper.

AI tools cannot meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements.

Authors who use AI tools in the writing of a manuscript, production of images or graphical elements of the paper, or in the collection and analysis of data, must be transparent in disclosing in the Materials and Methods (or similar section) of the paper how the AI tool was used and which tool was used. Authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, even those parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics.

COPE position statement The use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT or Large Language Models in research publications is expanding rapidly. COPE joins organisations, such as WAME and the JAMA Network among others, to state that AI tools cannot be listed as an author of a paper. AI tools cannot meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements. Authors who use AI tools in the writing of a manuscript, production of images or graphical elements of the paper, or in the collection and analysis of data, must be transparent in disclosing in the Materials and Methods (or similar section) of the paper how the AI tool was used and which tool was used. Authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, even those parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics.

The Committee on Publication Ethics statement on authors and AI

#writing #authors #ai #genai #chatgpt #academicchatter

https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

27.09.2024 12:00 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Existe coerência ideológica nas coligações partidárias de 2024?

EXISTE! 😱

1/10. Analisei 12,4 mil coligações dos mais de 15 mil candidatos a prefeito que concorrem com o apoio de ao menos um partido, e identifiquei a frequência das coligações segundo a posição ideológica das legendas🧶

05.09.2024 19:23 — 👍 34    🔁 8    💬 1    📌 0

@claucia-faganello is following 20 prominent accounts