@ivancuesta.bsky.social
Geografía.
China's official news agency Xinhua puts the country's coal peak at "around 2027" and oil peak "around 2026", also referencing the commitment to "gradually reduce" coal consumption that has been missing from recent policy papers.
25.11.2025 12:58 — 👍 73 🔁 19 💬 1 📌 2
Una modernidad autoritaria.
valenciaplaza.com/libros-comic...
www.hup.harvard.edu/books/978067...
20.11.2025 10:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
If CO2 emissions go to zero in 2050 (top), the sinks (green) will bring atmospheric CO2 back down (middle), & temperature will stabalise at ~1.7°C (bottom).
Going to zero today will keep us <1.5°C
Constant emissions leads to 2.6°C, rising rapidly thereafter.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
A más pragmatismo climático, más necesidad de reducir CO2 por cambios socioeconómicos (o +3°C en 2100).
Conversación entre Pedro Linares y Xavier García Casals sobre el modelado de reducción de emisiones por cambios socioeconómicos.
open.spotify.com/episode/6k52...
figure showing the top emitters
GHG Emissions in the top six absolute emitters, & per person.
Russia has passed the US in terms of GHG emissions per person.
No peak in Chinese emissions, & not expected even if CO2 emissions peak.
Country figures exclude LULUCF.
4/
Algunas ideas interesantes. Y otra actitud.
03.11.2025 13:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Documental sonoro.
www.rtve.es/play/audios/...
Podcast: Garrett Hardin era un xenófobo y un racista de tomo y lomo. Integrista del ecologismo neomalthusiano de derechas.
newbooksnetwork.com/garrett-hard...
'the total size of the Rare Earth oxide market in 2024 was “about the same as the North American avocado market”(!).'
edconway.substack.com/p/the-rare-e...
Me pasó como a Runciman. Pensaban en el voto obligatorio como algo muy carca, y resulta que es una medida bien factible para revertir la degradación de las democracias.
uk-podcasts.co.uk/podcast/past...
Los límites sociales se alcanzarán antes que los geofísicos.
08.10.2025 19:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Madrid DF, ¿qué significa? www.lavanguardia.com/politica/202...
07.10.2025 18:50 — 👍 56 🔁 20 💬 9 📌 5
Adam Tooze meets la Marina Alta.
youtube.com/watch?v=kHik...
Now reading Parsons, looking forward to his new book.
03.10.2025 07:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Again?
01.10.2025 12:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Va del Reino Unido y la próxima victoria de Farage, pero también de Europa, Trump, EEUU y el mundo si piensas como yo que desde 2008 la gran demanda del electorado (insatisfecha) a izquierda, centro y derecha es cambiar un sistema que tiene pánico a renovarse.
www.ppfideas.com/episodes/fix...
1/10
While I agree with much of what Stephen Bush argues here, I think this claim is overly simplistic: "This shouldn’t need saying in 2025 but markets and globalisation are good."
www.ft.com/content/2fa3...
1/10
I just finished reading Sven Beckert's history of the development of the global cotton industry. It's a bit repetitive in its main theses, and sometimes a bit of a slog, but well worth reading for those interested in the history of trade and industrial policy.
Analysis: China’s emissions have now caused more global warming than EU | @drsimevans.carbonbrief.org @vernerviisas.bsky.social #CBarchive
Read here: buff.ly/3OMo0Fx
Left: The share of fossil fuels and low-carbon sources in the total installed electricity generating capacity of each of the BRICS countries, as of 2024, compared to the global average. Right: The year by which BRICS countries have pledged to reach net-zero. Source: Global Energy Monitor, Climate Action Tracker.
NEW – Q&A: Will China and the BRICS fill the ‘leadership gap’ on climate change? | @anikanpatel.carbonbrief.org w/ comment from @yixiansun.bsky.social Jennifer Allan @jamesnorman.bsky.social Beatriz Mattos @katelogan.bsky.social
Read here: buff.ly/WVyH1Y0
A ver qué tal.
15.09.2025 08:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If every single ton of this 1,460 GtCO2 would be used to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, we could reverse 0.7°C of global warming.
And this estimate is a clear ceiling, because... /4
NEW STUDY: How much CO2 can we safely store in geological formations?
In a new @nature.com study, we cross-check established academic and industry estimates with various risk factors.
We find a prudent geological CO2 storage limit that is about 10x smaller. /1
Piketty's r>g in game form. Have a play! And it you'd like to learn more about inequality, have a listen to our podcast. therichdont.work?fbclid=PAVER... open.spotify.com/episode/0feO... #EconSky
03.09.2025 13:45 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
