@luisarroyo.bsky.social
EU and administrative law @uclm_es
A chart listing the Supreme Court's rulings on emergency applications from the Trump administration, the last 20 of which have been granted in full or in part, and almost always over dissents from (only) the Democratic appointees.
Here's my updated chart of #SCOTUS's rulings to date on emergency applications from the Trump administration.
See if you can spot the pattern...
The Supreme Court just ruled this meme is constitutional.
08.09.2025 15:59 — 👍 5139 🔁 1796 💬 98 📌 58SCOTUS: considering race as one factor in a college applicant's file is blatantly unconstitutional
ALSO SCOTUS: considering race as one factor in targeting whom to detain and deport is cool cool cool
Moreover, as for stops of those individuals who are legally in the country, the questioning in those circumstances is typically brief, and those individuals may promptly go free after making clear to the immigration officers that they are U.S. citizens or otherwise legally in the United States.
This is a paragraph Brett Kavanaugh wrote on his little computer and then sent out into the world:
08.09.2025 15:59 — 👍 5482 🔁 1282 💬 284 📌 771We just prevailed in our case against Trump's massive IEEPA tariffs, in the Federal Circuit! All challenged IEEPA tariffs ruled illegal, but scope of injunction TBD. Will have more to say later. Here is a link to the ruling (7-4 decision by en banc court): www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-ord...
29.08.2025 22:10 — 👍 481 🔁 141 💬 27 📌 4“Me acuerdo mucho de la igualdad entre los españoles cuando excavo en la Plaza de Robert Capa”.
Podría ser sólo una frase magnífica. Pero es además una frase llena de verdad.
@guerraenlauni.bsky.social
European Parliament brings legal challenge against EU Council (ie Member States' ministers) for adopting defence procurement law on the basis of emergency powers - www.linkedin.com/posts/john-b...
23.08.2025 12:47 — 👍 23 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 1
Don Andrés Trapiello, elegante intelectual del centricentro central, erudito prudente sin ideología y con biblioteca, tu sensatopensante abajofirmante de confianza, el Chaves Nogales del siglo XXI, tuiteando que el Gobierno no quiere apagar los incendios. La tercera España, tan primera como siempre.
18.08.2025 18:41 — 👍 60 🔁 18 💬 5 📌 1
In the last few years, the Supreme Court has embraced a formalist approach to separation of powers law, allegedly justified by the Constitution's "original meaning." It is revolutionary, rapidly remaking the constitutional law of administration. But the Court's engagement with history is selective and idiosyncratic. In particular, it has largely ignored what we know of governmental practice in the early republic. This Essay attacks the Court's use of history. It uses Jack Balkin's analysis of legal discourse in Memory and Authority to unpack the Court's reliance on historical arguments and to suggest avenues for critique. It draws on recent scholarship on Founding Era practice to show that eighteenth-century understandings of separation of powers were not formalist. And it argues for the restoration of Montesquieu to our constitutional memory. A key figure in the development of the Constitution, Montesquieu's understanding of separation of powers closely tracked early republic practice. He thus points the way towards an alternative interpretation of our constitutional tradition and a more pragmatic and historically accurate structural constitutionalism in place of the Court's growing formalist fetish.
Delighted to share my latest, History and Fetishism in the New Separation of Powers Formalism, now live in the Penn Law Review!
The piece traces the emergence of the Supreme Court’s new approach to separation of powers law and argues that it is grounded in a set of basic mistakes. (1/3)
🚨DHS asks the Supreme Court to halt an injunction restricting the ability of ICE and Border Patrol to stop and question people based on factors such as speaking Spanish, being Latino, doing day labor, or being in certain areas.
Hard not to read this as a request for a license to racially profile.
Hace unos días me entrevistó @clementealvarez.bsky.social de @elpais.com para hablar del libro Vida de Ricos. Conversamos en La Fresquera del CA2M de Móstoles, uno de esos palacios del pueblo climáticos que prefiguran lo mejor por venir. Hoy se publica:
elpais.com/clima-y-medi...
Preciosa crónica de Jordi Amat. Aitana al fondo; en primer plano,
la vida
elpais.com/cultura/2025...
Arrastrar los pies o directamente negarse a atender a niños y niñas en situación de desamparo es una enfermedad moral.
elpais.com/espana/2025-...
Pero para aumentar el gasto de defensa al 5 % sí que hay perras
Va a arder Francia.
ÚLTIMA HORA | El Supremo de EEUU avala el desmantelamiento del Departamento de Educación y los despidos masivos de la Administración Trump
www.eldiario.es/internaciona...
En plena ofensiva reaccionaria, la labor del sindicalismo para conquistar derechos es esencial.
El sindicalismo es democracia, no se puede criminalizar a quien lucha por mejorar su vida. Nuestro compromiso con las 6 de La Suiza es su indulto.
Sobre la bazofia de titulares sobre el IMV que se están publicando hoy y los supuestos ideológicos no confesados tras algunas evaluaciones "neutrales" solo os voy a decir una cosa: Auschwitz aumenta muchísimo la probabilidad de trabajar y las horas trabajadas. Y ahí lo dejo, a ver si se entiende ya.
09.07.2025 17:31 — 👍 42 🔁 14 💬 0 📌 0
🔴 El juez decreta el ingreso inmediato en prisión para las ‘seis sindicalistas de la Suiza’ tras su condena de cárcel por “coacciones graves”
09.07.2025 21:11 — 👍 18 🔁 21 💬 10 📌 3
Nazis everywhere
elpais.com/espana/2025-...
🚨🚨 Late at night, the European Union’s leadership excitedly revealed a new plan to combat the hell-raising American president’s #tradewar: Take him on at his own wild game. 🧵
www.politico.eu/article/eu-l...
NPR Migrants Captured In Libya Say They End Up Sold As Slaves March 21, 2018 6:27 AM ET Heard on Morning Edition By Ruth Sherlock, Lama Al-Arian
Today the GOP justices on the Supreme Court endorsed migrants being sold into slavery.
They'll claim otherwise, but that's the reality — today's decision permits Trump to send people from countries around the world to any global hellhole that accepts a U.S. financial incentive.
BREAKING: the Supreme Court *grants* the Trump administration's emergency plea in DHS v. D.V.D. to resume deporting non-citizens to third countries. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson dissent at length. The majority cites no reasons for granting the government's request.
23.06.2025 20:35 — 👍 498 🔁 205 💬 37 📌 113DISASTROUS. This means they will send people to horrific situations with no due process — in direct violation of promises the Solicitor General made to the Court in previous cases.
This greenlights sending people to be enslaved in Libya or tortured in any random foreign country.
#BREAKING: Over a (sharp) public dissent from the three Democratic appointees, #SCOTUS clears the way for the Trump administration to remove migrants to third countries *without* giving them an additional opportunity to contest whether they face persecution or other forms of mistreatment there:
23.06.2025 20:34 — 👍 3678 🔁 1448 💬 304 📌 507
eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-... EU Law Analysis: Advocate General Ćapeta’s Opinion in WS and Others v Frontex before the Grand Chamber: The End of Frontex’s Shielding? Joint Liability of Frontex and Member States in Return Operations
19.06.2025 17:50 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Quién es el funcionario de la órbita del PP al que el Gobierno señala por politizar el informe de Bruselas sobre la amnistía
11.06.2025 08:11 — 👍 18 🔁 7 💬 1 📌 0
[El Gran Reseteo: así es el detallado plan para desmantelar la UE que entusiasma a Vox. Un grupo húngaro y otro polaco logran el respaldo del partido de Abascal y otras fuerzas de extrema derecha a un programa de liquidación de las instituciones europeas]
elpais.com/espana/2025-... @elpais.com
