Samuel Alito is one of the worst jurists in the history of the Court. His willingness to abdicate and obfuscate in order to make imaginary arguments to justify any position he personally holds is alarming.
05.03.2025 15:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
That is the question of our time. For now, we relay on the judiciary to continue to pause executive overreach, and pump resources into the 2026 midterms. At the same time, I think Democrats should consider nationwide efforts to convince 34 states to convene a Constitutional Convention.
28.02.2025 18:21 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Correct, Congress is the appropriate and necessary check on Trump's administration.
28.02.2025 17:20 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Pam Bondi and the direction of this DOJ would have made the actual Publius take up arms, I think.
28.02.2025 17:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
A serious question as an antitrust-adjacent lawyer: How does one openly admit a localized publishing monopoly without some type of enforcement activity following right after? Seems less than ideal.
26.02.2025 17:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Also, I'd contend that post Loper-Bright, there's an even BETTER case now than in 1998 that there should be minimal deference to agency revocation considerations. Trump's own justices don't like it when executive agencies exercise raw power in anything!
26.02.2025 14:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
As opposed to Webster, which says this.
26.02.2025 14:28 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
You legitimately do not know what you're talking about.
26.02.2025 14:25 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Plot twist: The shitposter doesn't know what they're talking about.
26.02.2025 14:22 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
EO 12968 in 1995 provided standards of reviewing security clearance and outlined the appeal process. Webster v. Doe in 1998 allowed for security clearance review where the clearance revocation gives rise to "colorable" Constitutional claims-- such as clear violation of the First Amendment.
26.02.2025 14:18 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0
Honestly, the real malice here is that he tries to assert this is a "bill" as if he signs Executive Orders which are law. His efforts continue to focus on undermining every aspect of the separation of powers. Normal people out in the world will passively accept these must be laws. They are not.
26.02.2025 11:46 โ ๐ 67 ๐ 13 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Donald Trump's budget plan is available at the link below. His budget will raise the U.S. deficit by $3.078 trillion. Donald Trump's budget will raise the deficit by about $8,921 per person in the U.S.
docs.house.gov/meetings/BU/...
25.02.2025 18:49 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
They have to have something on Fetterman, right?
25.02.2025 04:20 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
YEAs ---66
Banks (R-IN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blackburn (R-TN)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boozman (R-AR)
Britt (R-AL)
Budd (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Cotton (R-AR)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Curtis (R-UT)
Daines (R-MT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ernst (R-IA)
Fetterman (D-PA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Gallego (D-AZ)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagerty (R-TN)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hawley (R-MO)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Hickenlooper (D-CO)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Husted (R-OH)
Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Johnson (R-WI)
Justice (R-WV)
Kelly (D-AZ)
Kennedy (R-LA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lankford (R-OK)
Lee (R-UT)
Lummis (R-WY)
Marshall (R-KS)
McConnell (R-KY)
McCormick (R-PA)
Moody (R-FL)
Moran (R-KS)
Moreno (R-OH)
Mullin (R-OK)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Peters (D-MI)
Reed (D-RI)
Ricketts (R-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Rosen (D-NV)
Rounds (R-SD)
Schmitt (R-MO)
Scott (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Sheehy (R-MT)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Tuberville (R-AL)
Warner (D-VA)
Wicker (R-MS)
NAYs ---28
Alsobrooks (D-MD)
Baldwin (D-WI)
Blunt Rochester (D-DE)
Booker (D-NJ)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Coons (D-DE)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hirono (D-HI)
Kim (D-NJ)
King (I-ME)
Lujan (D-NM)
Markey (D-MA)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Ossoff (D-GA)
Padilla (D-CA)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schiff (D-CA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Slotkin (D-MI)
Smith (D-MN)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warren (D-MA)
Welch (D-VT)
Wyden (D-OR)
If I were a Democrat, and I saw Trump do a purge of high-level generals who were women and people of color and wouldn't be "yes men," I wouldn't vote to advance JD Vance's college friend for Secretary of the Army.
And yet....16 Democrats just did so
25.02.2025 02:10 โ ๐ 6565 ๐ 2122 ๐ฌ 622 ๐ 812
Punish what? Unconstitutional state action doesn't need to, and rarely does, result in punishment for an individual. The courts today have done well to keep DOGE at bay temporarily. A judge in Maryland ruled in favor of Dep. Of Ed. against DOGE, for example. Congress has to act for it to matter.
25.02.2025 03:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0
This includes facts that would strongly support two cases now before the courts alleging that Musk/DOGE are exercising government authority in violation of the Appointments Clause.
@mattbaidc.bsky.social in WaPo with details on USAID "tightly controlled" by DOGEโคต๏ธ
h/t @samsteindc.bsky.social
24.02.2025 16:55 โ ๐ 734 ๐ 294 ๐ฌ 24 ๐ 26
I am a Federalist. We need government, and I believe the proper government is one which respect rule of law articulated in the Constitution. Since 1860, that vision has been lost. We can go back, and I advocate for that.
25.02.2025 02:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
You are conversing with a 30-something lawyer who works in corporate litigation (with a focus on antitrust) and works in midtown Manhattan. I created this account (literally today) to remain anonymous and to speak freely as I please about politics. I intend to publish through SubStack as well.
25.02.2025 02:53 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Yes, which requires overturning Citizens United.
Or, better yet and what I advocate, a Constitutional amendment which makes overturning Citizens United the supreme law of the land.
25.02.2025 02:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
The cure for America's illness is the dissolution of faction. These are but 2 brief excerpts from Federalist 51, which all should read. George Washington described the evils of faction in his Farewell Address to the nation. We must destroy factional politics.
25.02.2025 02:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Democracy, real Democracy, is much more difficult than preservation of the Federalism we've lost along the way. The entire foundation of this persona that I express is my staunch belief and advocacy for the Federalism described by Madison and Hamilton. Federalist 51 predicted our reality exactly.
25.02.2025 02:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0
Because it's what our Founders envisioned for our Constitutional Republic, and it directly subverts the strength of the modern GOP if their base is splintered into smaller blocs. The goal is to subvert the dominant GOP faction, as discussed at length in Federalist 51.
25.02.2025 01:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Boycotts are taking hold. Protests are on the rise. Federal courts are hitting back. The Trump-Musk-Vance regime's popularity is plunging and DOGE is losing credibility. In these dark times, it's important to recognize that people are fighting back. Join them.
25.02.2025 00:46 โ ๐ 13003 ๐ 3145 ๐ฌ 295 ๐ 156
The "burn and rebuild" path is just as long, isn't it? You can do what I suggest as it burns, and the rebuilding is what I suggest. I think a Constitutional Convention before the midterms could 100% happen if Democrats executed well enough.
25.02.2025 01:41 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
I don't mean the podcasters and Gavin McG's of the world, I mean very specifically the normal, everyday people who would give themselves that label. The Trumpian ends are not shocking to me, it shocks me they are comfortable with the despotic means. They could do all this with the Legislature!
25.02.2025 01:36 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Remember when she said in her prior ruling that she was unsure if the Government's application of DOGE was scattershot by design or by sheer incompetence?
I hope the Judge has found her answer.
25.02.2025 01:04 โ ๐ 25 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
I think there is a way to weaponize the split in ideology between the center-right and the far-right, and I think proper messaging could very well work to upset the populations of enough states to meet the 2/3 requirement to essentially hit the reset button on our Federal government.
25.02.2025 00:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
I think if we continue to see Congressional Republicans behave the way they are, the tack of the Democrats should be twofold: Promote and collaborate to expand the number of major political parties in the United States, and convince 34 (2/3) state legislatures to convene a Constitutional Convention.
25.02.2025 00:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0
This persona I embody exists specifically as a counter to the likes of Curtis Yarvin and anyone who's been to a Mises Caucus event in the last 10 years.
25.02.2025 00:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
I want my Constitutional Republic to remain a Constitutional Republic instead of a monarchy. In my humble belief that is the most readily addressible issue before the nation.
24.02.2025 23:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Constitutional and admin law prof. Author, Democracy's Chief Executive (U. Cal. 2022). Podcast host @DemChiefExecPod. @Monthly contributor. Corgi-obsessed.
Associate prof, WashULaw. ConLaw, legal history, the presidency, administrative law.
Professor of Law @ Marquette. Is the administrative state history?
Political Science Professor at Marquette. APD, Constitutional Law + history & Administrative Law. Writing a book on the Steel Seizure case. Contributor, @liberalcurrents.com
https://patsobkowski.com/
Bowdoin College professor of political science; affiliated with UCL's Centre on US Politics and UVa's Miller Center. Feed includes posts on presidential power, bureaucratic politics, and carping about Boston sports and European football
@VandyPoliSci Assistant Professor. Research: Presidency, Congress, American Political Development. @Yale PhD & proud @UConn alum. http://johnadearborn.com
Historian of conservatism, media, and the presidency at Vanderbilt. Author of PARTISANS & MESSENGERS OF THE RIGHT. Cohost of @thisdaypod.com from Radiotopia. Frequently posting on IG stories @pastpundit
Notre Dame Law School professor. Administrative law geek. Should be writing. Papers here: ssrn.com/author=926820
Law Prof @ umich (formerly Ohio State), ABA AdLaw Section past chair, YaleJREG blogger, #adlaw nerd, dad of four
https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/christopher-j-walker
University of Michigan law professor. Legal historian. Constitutional litigator. Walking thorny ground. Probably kidding.
Faculty bio at http://bit.ly/jdm-bio
William T Comfort III Professor of Law, NYU Law School, studying & teaching local govโt, landuse regulation, constโl law, fed courts, admin law, legislation, and federalism. Forlorn hope: reduce stakes and polarization by decentralizing divisive decisions.
Law Professor at Yale. Energy, climate, finreg, bankruptcy, and regulation.
Law professor
https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/nikolas-bowie/
Law prof nรฉe anthropologist. Legal language, bureaucratic culture, democratic legitimation. ๅฎ้
ไป / ะะฝัะบะฐ
Political science professor, academic dean, writer, podcaster, shaker of hands with Mel Brooks โ you know, the usual kinks.
Teaching tax & torts @nyulaw
Historian of early US politics & culture; howl re: democracyโa lot. Last book: The Field of Blood: Violence in Congress & the Road to Civil War. Owned by Newbie the History Bird & Rosie the Resistance Bird.
https://www.youtube.com/@joannefreeman1755
Agnes Williams Sesquicentennial Professor of Law and Politics, Georgetown Law: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/josh-chafetz/
Author, most recently, of _Congress's Constitution_: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0300248334/
Constitutional law prof and historical political scientist studying:
The United States Supreme Court
American Political Development
Anglo-American Constitutionalism
๐Atlanta
Author, Rot and Revival:
https://www.ucpress.edu/books/rot-and-revival/paper
Historian & Director of the Richards Civil War Era Center at Penn State. I study U.S. political, legal, & constitutional history. Writing a book about the political activities & political culture of 19th-century Supreme Court justices. rachelshelden.com