Infernal Saint Nobody

Where is The Satanic Temple's outrage when innocent people are being shot in the streets? Lucien Greaves found his voice to mourn a white-supremacist podcaster and to preach nonviolence, but when Nazis murder civilians, there is only silence. That silence isn’t accidental. It’s a statement.

True Satanism isn’t about battling the imagined Ialdabaoth. It’s about owning your power and living authentically. If Fragment can’t see that, then the problem isn’t the world. It’s his own fragile, self-imposed cage.

Someone needs to remind Fragment that Satanism isn’t about rejecting everything. It’s about embracing individuality, freedom, and rejecting false authority. Constant rebellion for rebellion’s sake isn’t power; it’s insecurity in disguise.

Real strength doesn’t need constant validation. It asserts itself naturally, without the need for ritualistic reinforcement. Fragment needs to stop obsessing over theological separations and question his own rigidity. He’s building walls instead of tearing them down.

The obsession with “identity erasure” is absolutely laughable. Just because progressive Christians share some values doesn’t mean you lose your identity. It means you’re human. But no, he’d rather wedge himself further from humanity, distort Satanism, & pretend that’s virtuous.

Satanism isn’t about perpetual discomfort or friction for friction’s sake. It’s about rejecting blind obedience, not rejecting basic decency just because it “feels too Christian.” Decency doesn’t belong to religion. It belongs to those who think for themselves.

Ah, more grandstanding from Satanic Fragment, yet another “self-styled” guardian of Satanism, perched on his intellectual throne, throwing a fit because someone dared to suggest that being a decent human doesn’t need divine approval.

They're afraid to take a stance on anything, with the exception of speaking up about the death of CK.

Sermons about kindness ring hollow when cruelty has been a core part of your identity. Inclusivity isn’t something you declare after the damage. It’s something you prove before asking for credibility.

Communities don’t succeed because they’re endlessly forgiving. They succeed because they’re principled, accountable, and honest about power and abuse when it shows up internally.

You don’t get to posture as morally enlightened while presiding over a culture that routinely alienates and silences people, then blame “misuse of the cause” when it inevitably blows back.

Lucien Greaves lecturing anyone about “inclusivity” and “forgiveness” is a joke given his long record of antagonism, internal purges, and scorched-earth behavior.

"Treating people like shit, or allowing your cause to be used as justification by some to treat others like shit, is a recipe for failure. In the end, a more inclusive and forgiving community will always win." - Lucien Greaves, "Binary Thinking and The Opposition Trap"

Strip away the fancy language, and the message is simple: people aren’t responsible for their actions, unless they’re his opponents. It’s self-serving nonsense, and it deserves to be dismissed.

The hypocrisy is hard to miss. Greaves lectures about cruelty while building his profile on mockery and provocation. “Mob behavior” only bothers him when it targets people he agrees with.

The core claim, that criticism and social consequences create extremists, is weak. It reframes accountability as cruelty and judgment as abuse, until no one is ever responsible for anything they do.

Blaming fear and superstition is easier than admitting that people can adopt destructive beliefs and act on them. Greaves erases agency to protect his argument.

His use of Sean Sellers is especially dishonest. Sellers murdered three people. Labeling him a “creation of the Satanic Panic” sidesteps that reality. Culture didn’t force him to kill anyone. He chose to.

He attacks moral certainty while behaving as though he’s certain he’s right. The contradiction isn’t subtle. It’s the backbone of the essay.

Lucien Greaves’ “Binary Thinking and the Opposition Trap” tries to sound nuanced, but it mostly functions as an excuse to dodge responsibility. He condemns “binary thinking” while splitting the world into enlightened people like himself and irrational mobs.

At a moment when people are being disappeared, beaten, and stripped of their rights, The Satanic Temple is selling tickets and congratulating itself. They deserve nothing but contempt.

There is no organizing. No strategy. No confrontation with power. Just bad bands, empty rhetoric, and unqualified, inexperienced speakers. Aesthetics over substance. Performance over resistance.

But when reality demands action, TST’s response is a pathetic, performative “revival”, a masturbatory spectacle that functions as little more than a thinly veiled cash grab aimed at its own members.

The Satanic Temple loves to brand itself as a frontline opponent of Christian nationalism. It wraps itself in the language of resistance and radicalism while demanding to be taken seriously as a political force.

Everything is burning. Christian nationalism is consolidating power. The state is increasingly comfortable terrorizing marginalized people. Violence against civilians is treated as collateral damage. We are long past the point where symbolic resistance matters. 🧵

Marginalized people are being kidnapped, harmed, and even murdered, yet the Satanic Temple remains silent. They spoke out when CK died, but now they remain quiet. Silence in the face of injustice is complicity. Your beloved tenets seem meaningless if they aren't backed by action.

The fuckin' audacity this bitch has in trying to springboard off the tragedy of the past week to make a profit. People like this don't give a damn about you. They're just looking to take advantage of whatever incident they can in order to fuel their grift.

This essay doesn’t show strength or reason. It shows insecurity wrapped in authority. Fragment isn’t being silenced. He’s being accurately assessed. That assessment makes clear he shouldn’t be trusted with power, responsibility, or moral guidance.

Comparisons to terrorists and conspiracy extremists only highlight an inability to tolerate criticism. Confidence doesn’t require exaggeration or demeaning dissent to survive.