cool work! #neuroskyence
07.10.2025 14:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@neuroengineering.bsky.social
Your (non-addictive) dose of neurotechnology news π§ β‘οΈ
cool work! #neuroskyence
07.10.2025 14:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Precision Neuroscience published their high-density ECoG in Nature Biomed. Eng.
The startup shows a 1,024-channel grid implanted through a cortical slit in pigs, and intraoperative neural recordings and stimulation in five humans at sub-mm resolution.
#neuroskyence @precisionneuro.bsky.social
Can we combine neural data across individuals to improve speech BCIs?
A recent study used transfer learning on distributed iEEG recordings to enhance speech decoding. By learning shared latent manifolds, their cross-subject model outperformed individual models in a speech motor task.
#neuroskyence
awesome work!
04.10.2025 21:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0great work! congrats
04.10.2025 21:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Awesome work! congrats to the whole team
02.10.2025 18:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Neuropixel's newest ultra-high density probe enables larger neuronal yield (up to 2x), with over 6000 recording channels.
#neuroskyence
With all that said, we agree the system can (and should) improve. But stopping research until ethics are "settled" isn't the answer.
We need stronger safeguards (independent ethics, transparency, global dialogue) while enabling responsible innovation. Unfortunately, there is no single solution.
Which brings us to the current solution of local ethical committees and approvals for any research to be conducted at all. This study, for example, was approved by the Elche ethics committee, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983370), and conducted under EU clinical trial regulations.
π§΅(8/8)
We simply wouldn't have enough ethicists to resolve all open questions, assuming they could even agree on global standards across so many cultures and values. And even if they did, there are no enforcement bodies to make such standards *global* and ensure they are followed by *everyone*.
π§΅(7/8)
What you propose would only work with a *worldwide* halt on *all* neurotech research, which seems impossible with so many parties involved.
And if that logic applies, why not halt every other field too? That would create countless ethical questions, far too many to handle.
π§΅(6/8)
With neurotech it's even harder and more delicate: beyond the risk of misuse, the ethical requirements themselves are unclear.
For example, technologies that might alter or decode memory raise questions we can't yet define, because we don't know what is scientifically possible.
π§΅(5/8)
Otherwise we would never have dynamites (or any technology for that matter) since all can be misused depending on who uses it.
π§΅(4/8)
So halting research postponed the benefit of using dynamites to open tunnels for many people.
One could argue it also postponed people being killed by dynamites. But if we accept dynamite as a necessary technology for progress and wellbeing, then we have to accept both its pros and cons.
π§΅(3/8)
Take dynamite: once its feasibility was shown, should research have stopped until ethics were agreed?
Say, after long debate we decide that dynamites should only be used for mines and not for killing. That still doesn't prevent its misuse later.
π§΅(2/8)
We don't think stopping research until all ethics are settled is practicable. We share your concern. Ethics is crucial, but often broad and only becomes concrete as technical details emerge through research. Since every technology is double edged, there's never a simple right or wrong.
π§΅(1/8)
Exactly! (Unfortunately) that's the double-edged nature of technological progress. With neurotechnologies in particular we need to prioritize human-centered design that safeguards autonomy, while placing neuroethics and neurorights at the heart of innovation.
28.09.2025 16:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Optimizing stimulation patterns for visual implants ποΈ Check out @mbeyeler.bsky.social's recent study on using spiking activity to adapt stimulation parameters for more stable and reliable perception
#neuroskyence #bci
How does intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) affect the brain?
ICMS affects both vascular and immune responses. Higher currents increase blood-brain barrier leakage, letting substances enter surrounding tissue. Soon after, microglia activate and cluster around highly active regions
#neuroskyence
Better neural decoding using connectomics and emotional states? Check out @julianneumann.bsky.social newest study in Nature Biomed. Eng!
#neuroskyence #bci #compneurosky
How does the body regulate blood pressure after SCI?
Scientists mapped the precise nerve circuits causing dangerous spikes in mice, rats, and humans. By stimulating these circuits with epidural electrical stimulation, they activated a competing pathway that stabilized blood pressure.
#neuroskyence
Blood pressure control after SCI has been challenging β until now.
Swiss and Canadian researchers developed an implantable system that epidurally stimulates three thoracic segments, triggering a strong pressor response and rapidly reducing hypotensive symptoms.
#neuroskyence #sci #onward
awesome!
16.09.2025 05:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0How far can intravascular electrodes reach?
Scientists miniaturized stentrode-like electrodes to access small, deep cortical veins. Their probe goes beyond large vessels used by Synchron, enabling recordings from hand and speech regions with ECoG-level quality.
#neuroskyence #bci #synchron
Might focused ultrasound one day replace DBS?
UK Scientists built a 256-panel focused ultrasound helmet that can precisely target deep brain regions. Using theta-burst TUS, they stimulated the LGN and found visual cortex activity with effects lasting up to 40 minutes.
#neuroskyence #ultrasound
#neuroskyence
10.09.2025 20:24 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Neuralink update π§
β’ 2 new patients implanted in Canada, marking first trials outside the US
β’ US patent office rejects βtelepathyβ and βtelekinesisβ trademarks, as they were previously claimed by a lucid dreaming startup
#neuroskyence #bci #neuralink