blog post:
probability sample = known nonzero probability
epsem = equal individual probabilities
SRS = equal entire-sample probabilities
@shiraamitchell.bsky.social
survey statistician at blue rose research π
blog post:
probability sample = known nonzero probability
epsem = equal individual probabilities
SRS = equal entire-sample probabilities
Cover of book, titled βThe Politics of Human Rightsβ by Sabine Carey, Mark Gibney, and Anita Gohdes. Picture shows a woman kneeling in front riot police during a BLM protest in the US.
Coming soon: our introduction to the politics of human rights π₯³π
Preorder available here: www.cambridge.org/highereducat...
@sabinecarey.bsky.social
blog post: quantity vs quality
compare 2 surveys:
1. 100% coverage, but response probability P[R = 1 | Y] differs a lot by Y
2. Only 5% coverage, but P[R = 1 | Y] is roughly constant across Y
which would you use ? both ?
new blog post: sampling the sample
weβve focused on estimating means E[Y].
but say Y are openends ("describe how you feel about the candidate") and you want to read thru a few draws from the population, not only survey responders.
what should you do ?
blog post: weights and MRP for voters
so far we've talked about weights and MRP for E[Y], vote choice in the population overall.
but what if you want E[Y | V = 1], vote choice in the population of voters.
what are the weights and how do you modify MRP ?
Survey Statistics: continued struggles with equivalent weights
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/11/04/s...
blog post: continued struggles with equivalent weights
04.11.2025 21:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: Blue Rose Research is hiring !
We are looking for a teammate with expertise in both LLM tools and statistical modeling.
Someone who clearly communicates assumptions, results, and uncertainty. With care and kindness.
CC @swenkuh.bsky.social @avehtari.bsky.social
22.10.2025 13:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: individualism doesn't work
typical machine learning loss looks at one individual at a time
but for MRP, we care about aggregates
kinda the flipside of last week's post: bsky.app/profile/shir...
15.10.2025 13:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0CC @yajuansi.bsky.social @bradytwest.bsky.social
15.10.2025 13:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0blog post: MRPW
you've got a survey collected by someone else, and they gave you weights.
how can you use those weights in the MRP (Multilevel Regression and Poststratification) ?
CC: @tslumley.bsky.social
07.10.2025 23:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: struggles with equivalent weights
you've done MRP.
someone asks you for survey weights.
how to get them ?
CC @fontikar.bsky.social @njtierney.bsky.social π₯Ύ
01.10.2025 11:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: beyond balancing
in midterms, voters tend to support the out party for balance
do polls still help predict midterms ? yes
The ultimate New York City loverβs treasure hunt is back Friday, Oct. 17 through Sunday, Oct. 19: bit.ly/3IHnHwn
26.09.2025 19:58 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0highly recommend reading @soodoku.bsky.social's post (even if it is about elephants and not bears)
www.gojiberries.io/lessons-from...
it was for me too !
23.09.2025 23:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: Fat Bear Week
Basu's Bears is a lesson in:
1) using auxiliary information (pre-salmon-feasting weights)
2) how bad an unbiased estimator can be
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/09/23/s...
CC: @shirokuriwaki.bsky.social @rnishimura.bsky.social
16.09.2025 21:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: random sampling is not leaving
we turned to response instrument Z because random sampling is "dead"
but does this method still rely on starting with random sampling ?
blog post: random sampling is not leaving
we turned to response instrument Z because random sampling is "dead"
but does this method still rely on starting with random sampling ?
that makes sense !
Z0 = treatment at time 0
Z1 = treatment at time 1
Y1 = outcome at time 1
Y2 = outcome at time 2
teammate 1 is regressing Y1 on Z0
teammate 2 is regressing Y2 on Z0, Z1, Y1
teammate 2 wants Y1 not to be imputed with Y2, right ?
teammate 1 wants Y1 to be imputed with Y2, right ?
thanks, Lucy ! What if each teammate is running a different analysis with a different "Y" ? my "Y" might be your "X" ? would we have a different imputation procedure for each of us so that each person's "Y" is no used in imputing their "X" ?
11.09.2025 11:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0blog post on imputation (again):
we want E[Y|X] but X can be missing
@lucystats.bsky.social @sarahlotspeich.bsky.social @glenmartin.bsky.social @maartenvsmeden.bsky.social et al. say:
random imputation should use Y
deterministic imputation shouldn't
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/09/09/s...
I learn from every interaction with Maria. I attended a talk of hers yesterday. I highly recommend reading her work.
09.09.2025 14:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0blog post: connections between survey statistics and experimental design.
split-plot designs are analogous to cluster sampling.
blocking is analogous to stratification.
featuring an experiment by Arjun Potter and colleagues at NM-AIST !
CC @davidbroska.bsky.social @austin-van-loon.bsky.social
28.08.2025 10:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0