Colin's Avatar

Colin

@colinjaitken.bsky.social

29 | he/him | ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ | Former Councillor | Liberal ๐Ÿ”ถ

340 Followers  |  335 Following  |  81 Posts  |  Joined: 07.11.2024  |  2.3241

Latest posts by colinjaitken.bsky.social on Bluesky

๐Ÿšจ NEW: Ed Davey has said Netanyahuโ€™s plans to occupy Gaza City show he has the goal of โ€œethnic cleansingโ€

08.08.2025 08:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 26    ๐Ÿ” 9    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
A highland cow grazing in a field with a stately home nestled behind some trees in the background

A highland cow grazing in a field with a stately home nestled behind some trees in the background

Happy Tuesday! ๐Ÿ„

06.05.2025 14:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 14    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Well put! It is completely shameless ๐Ÿซฅ

02.05.2025 20:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I do ๐Ÿ˜” and also the sibling marriages thatโ€™s was pretty crazy.

01.05.2025 20:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Liberal candidate is nearly 4000 votes ahead with only two polling stations remaining

Liberal candidate is nearly 4000 votes ahead with only two polling stations remaining

CBC finally calls Carleton - the Canadian Tory leader Pierre Poilievre has lost his own seat

29.04.2025 08:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8469    ๐Ÿ” 1413    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 438    ๐Ÿ“Œ 441

Probably less bad more uninspiring. I think the Liberals/Carney just did a better job motivating the anti-Trump and anti-Tory sentiment. I guess the Liberals are in the (enviable?) position of not being everyoneโ€™s favourite but usually being everyoneโ€™s second favourite.

29.04.2025 08:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s givingโ€ฆ

22.04.2025 10:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 12    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™m sorry but the idea that ALL women (or anyone for that matter) can tell someoneโ€™s biological sex based on *the sound of their voice* and be correct every time is absolutely insane.

20.04.2025 13:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Youโ€™re evading the question, how can you prove to me that youโ€™re a women? That youโ€™re entitled to use womenโ€™s only facilities? What if someone challenges your biological sex? (Something that has and will unfortunately continue to happen to cis women)

20.04.2025 10:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And how exactly do you go about proving that? On a practical level how is that at all enforceable without some gross acts of illiberalism?

20.04.2025 10:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Which in the case of trans women is female? So I donโ€™t really see the need for any neutral washrooms. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

18.04.2025 20:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh yes, nothing says โ€˜very sensibleโ€™ quite like othering a vulnerable minority.

18.04.2025 20:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
LGBT+ LIB DEMS STATEMENT
On the Supreme Court ruling, 16/04/25

Like many, we are disappointed and deeply concerned by todayโ€™s Supreme Court judgement, which marks a significant and troubling shift away from decades of settled legal precedent.
By redefining sex in law as โ€œbiologicalโ€ โ€” a term with no clear legal or scientific consensus, and one that does not reflect the lived realities of many people, the ruling introduces confusion and instability into our legal system, which has treated โ€œsexโ€ and โ€œgenderโ€ as interchangeable for decades.
We are concerned that this creates an unsatisfactory ambiguity around how people with various endocrine and intersex conditions should be treated, how Gender Recognition Certificates can be obtained and given their intended force in law, and many other areas.
This ruling undermines established protections for trans+ people.  Attempts to define sex biologically risk rolling back hard-won rights for all women, not just trans+ women, which is why Liberal Democrats oppose them.
However, nothing in this judgement means that trans+ women can or should be regularly excluded from women's services and spaces.  The law still says that trans+ people should not be excluded without a proportionate and legitimate reason.
(Continues - )

LGBT+ LIB DEMS STATEMENT On the Supreme Court ruling, 16/04/25 Like many, we are disappointed and deeply concerned by todayโ€™s Supreme Court judgement, which marks a significant and troubling shift away from decades of settled legal precedent. By redefining sex in law as โ€œbiologicalโ€ โ€” a term with no clear legal or scientific consensus, and one that does not reflect the lived realities of many people, the ruling introduces confusion and instability into our legal system, which has treated โ€œsexโ€ and โ€œgenderโ€ as interchangeable for decades. We are concerned that this creates an unsatisfactory ambiguity around how people with various endocrine and intersex conditions should be treated, how Gender Recognition Certificates can be obtained and given their intended force in law, and many other areas. This ruling undermines established protections for trans+ people. Attempts to define sex biologically risk rolling back hard-won rights for all women, not just trans+ women, which is why Liberal Democrats oppose them. However, nothing in this judgement means that trans+ women can or should be regularly excluded from women's services and spaces. The law still says that trans+ people should not be excluded without a proportionate and legitimate reason. (Continues - )

(- continues)
As LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, we will not stand by in silence.  We don't think Britain is the sort of country where people should have to show their 'papers, please' in order to use the loo.
The fight for trans+ equality continues, and we will never stop standing up for our trans+, non-binary and gender non-conforming communities, and all communities under our wonderfully diverse LGBTQ+ umbrella.
We are proud to be in the most progressive party across Great Britain for LGBT+ rights.  Lib Dems seek to uplift individuals and their communities, and help them to be the best they can be, free to be who they are.
We believe people when they show us who they are.  We celebrate diversity, and do not support efforts to legislate in ignorance to enforce conformity.  We remain steadfast in our commitment to dignity, safety and justice for all.
Ever yours,
The Executive Committee
LGBT+ Liberal Democrats

(- continues) As LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, we will not stand by in silence. We don't think Britain is the sort of country where people should have to show their 'papers, please' in order to use the loo. The fight for trans+ equality continues, and we will never stop standing up for our trans+, non-binary and gender non-conforming communities, and all communities under our wonderfully diverse LGBTQ+ umbrella. We are proud to be in the most progressive party across Great Britain for LGBT+ rights. Lib Dems seek to uplift individuals and their communities, and help them to be the best they can be, free to be who they are. We believe people when they show us who they are. We celebrate diversity, and do not support efforts to legislate in ignorance to enforce conformity. We remain steadfast in our commitment to dignity, safety and justice for all. Ever yours, The Executive Committee LGBT+ Liberal Democrats

Statement from us on today's ruling:

"As LGBT+ Liberal Democrats... we don't think Britain is the sort of country where people should have to show their 'papers, please' in order to use the loo. ...we do not support efforts to legislate in ignorance to enforce conformity."

๐Ÿ”ถ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ๐Ÿงก

16.04.2025 20:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 160    ๐Ÿ” 60    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 10    ๐Ÿ“Œ 5

I guess my biggest questions on this is 1) how is this even practically enforceable in most instances without seriously compromising peopleโ€™s privacy? And 2) what about people who are born intersex?

Maybe the EA 2010 needs some clarification on terms but is this really the way to go about it?

16.04.2025 11:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Enjoy it while it lasts ๐Ÿซก

15.04.2025 11:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
A selfie of me wearing a Kieth Haring inspired jumper from H&M that reads โ€˜What do I do with my spare time? What spare timeโ€™

A selfie of me wearing a Kieth Haring inspired jumper from H&M that reads โ€˜What do I do with my spare time? What spare timeโ€™

Happy Saturday from me and my new jumper ๐Ÿ˜Œ

12.04.2025 12:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 30    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Despite backing the US in every major conflict this centuryโ€”and offering to water down our tax on US tech billionairesโ€”weโ€™ve been rewarded with the same tariffs as Iran.

Itโ€™s like weโ€™re meant to be grateful Trump gave our friends a black eye and left us with just a wedgie.

03.04.2025 09:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 633    ๐Ÿ” 170    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 24    ๐Ÿ“Œ 13

You have that straight artificial line that looks like it was drawn with a rulerโ€ฆwait wrong border.

21.03.2025 16:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I know itโ€™s FOX News, so beyond any reason or logic but like Canada *literally* exists because our ancestors didnโ€™t want to be American. Like that was the whole point.

14.03.2025 09:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Ed Davey shares a meal with two women in a Canadian-themed pub, enjoying poutine and laughter. Hockey memorabilia and a maple leaf made of hockey sticks decorate the background.

Ed Davey shares a meal with two women in a Canadian-themed pub, enjoying poutine and laughter. Hockey memorabilia and a maple leaf made of hockey sticks decorate the background.

 Ed Davey peeks through a Canadian flag curtain, his face framed by the maple leaf, smiling.

Ed Davey peeks through a Canadian flag curtain, his face framed by the maple leaf, smiling.

Strengthening UK-Canada relations, one plate of poutine at a time ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

12.03.2025 18:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1097    ๐Ÿ” 151    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 43    ๐Ÿ“Œ 31

I mean obviously the US is the David to Canadaโ€™s Goliath in this trade war ๐Ÿ˜‚

11.03.2025 14:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

WHAT!? How do people not know about this icon?? ๐Ÿ˜ญ

11.03.2025 07:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I know right! They need to send him down to Washington to give Trump a good โ€˜Shawinigan Handshakeโ€™ ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

10.03.2025 14:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I mean, my instinct would be to say it probably wonโ€™t be major issue, and if it is in some parts of the country it probably wonโ€™t be to the benefit of the Tories at least. ๐Ÿ˜…

10.03.2025 13:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Listening to Mark Carney speak French last night I realised the Liberals finally found the Anglo equivalent of Jean Chrรฉtien.

10.03.2025 13:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Happy #CommonwealthDay to everyone celebrating!

Today, we honour the unity, diversity & values shared by 2.7 billion people across our family of 56 nations.

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ

10.03.2025 12:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

2025 Canadian Federal Election:
Battle of Alberta edition

09.03.2025 22:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think the NDP already said they would vote to bring down the government as soon as they were given the chance so it was going to happen either way sooner rather than later ๐Ÿ˜…

09.03.2025 22:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes! Did Inverness to London and back a couple of times and loved it!

08.03.2025 09:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Jaw-dropping revelations in The New York Times on the most recent Trudeau-Trump calls. Report says that Trump, alongside rehearsing familiar list of grievances against Canada, told Trudeau he wanted to revise the US/Canadian border. He offered no justification.

07.03.2025 14:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 667    ๐Ÿ” 283    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 84    ๐Ÿ“Œ 47

@colinjaitken is following 19 prominent accounts