Welcome @clearinghouse.bsky.social!
21.06.2025 10:28 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@vixulation.bsky.social
CBT therapist & Trainee Clinical Psychologist ๐ง Research: Post-stroke Depression, wisdom. Interests: Trauma, Neuro, Eating Disorder & Learning Disabilities. Dog dad ๐ | Gamer ๐ฎ| Turkish Cypriot | ADHD
Welcome @clearinghouse.bsky.social!
21.06.2025 10:28 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks Elena. How is 2nd year going?
02.04.2025 11:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Reminder. If you're on the DClin, qualified or are aspiring. Feel free to comment below to be added to the starter pack.
01.04.2025 21:34 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How is everyone? I'm finally back. Submitted my #dclin thesis a few weeks ago. Viva is on the 19th of May. The end is getting closer and closer!
01.04.2025 21:30 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0OPSYRIS has joined BlueSky! We are an organisation focused on promoting research on psychological outcomes of stroke with the aim of improving clinical practice. Learn more about us (and our upcoming conference ๐) on our website
opsyris.org
๐ง Whatโs next in research on psychological aspects of #stroke? Join #OPSYRIS2025 ! Share your insights, present your work, and connect with fellow researchers on 11th July 2025 at @uniofmanchester.bsky.social
๐To submit your abstracts for talks or posters: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
๐จ Call for Abstracts #OPSYRIS2025 ! ๐จ
Conducting research into psychological aspects of #stroke? Submit your abstract & present at the OPSYRIS Conference @officialuom.bsky.social on 11th July! ๐ง โจ
๐Submit abstracts: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
๐Registration: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/opsyris-20...
Hello BlueSky #PPI world! Do you have examples of best practice that our #DClinPsy trainees can be inspired by? Short YouTube clips idealโฆ.
Putting together a new lecture on โPPI in researchโ for our first years ๐
Thanks in advance
#Involvement #ClinicalPsychology
Every time I visit Twitter and then return to BluSky. It's like taking that first deep breath of fresh air
02.12.2024 22:38 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Come and join our global team building capacity in child and adolescent mental health - we need a new Managing Director - new york city based - amazing opportinity for someone with experience in global mental health workforcenow.adp.com/mascsr/defau...
25.11.2024 16:33 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It doesn't help that some papers will evaluate the structural validity for the entire measure, not the subscales, but only evaluate internal consistency for the subscales, not the whole measure. Sometimes, they only report on the internal consistency for the entire measure, not the subscales.
25.11.2024 13:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0And this is what it says regarding unidimensionality and internal consistency.
Also, from what I've seen so far, most papers have evaluated structural validity for the entire measure, not the subscales individually. So again, not sure if those results apply to the subscales separately or not.
Hi Rogier, thanks for your response. So COMSIN is a tool that evaluates measures based on different properties, i.e., Content validity, structural validity, etc...
COSMIN states that measures with subscales and total scores must be evaluated separately.
I'm very new to this area of research. So if anyone can help and especially if they're familiar with COSMIN, I'd really appreciate some input.
Thanks
So if a measure has 3 subscales and has a total score, that's 4 separate measures. One measure, used a 3 factor model in their CFA, which suggests multidimensionality. But then report an explained variance of 62%, which my supervisor believes provides evidence of unidimensionality.
23.11.2024 01:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Whether there is evidence of unidimensionality. All my studies are using either CFA, PCA, or EFA. I've tried reading literature, speaking with my supervisor, and even asking CHATGPT out of desperation.
In COSMIN, I need to evaluate the measures subscales and total measure separately.
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the right place, but is there anyone who could help me. I'm doing an SR using COSMIN to evaluate wisdom measures.
Evaluating internal consistency requires evidence of unidimensionality based on the structural validity, and I can't figure out what to look for to know
This explains why conservative fear-mongering is such an easy play in America.
โ Ppl believe trans ppl make up 21% of the population (Real number: 1%)
โ Ppl believe Black ppl make up 41% of the nation (real number 12%)
โ Ppl believe Jewish ppl make up 30% of the nation (Real number, 2%)
Looking for experts by experience to consult on materials (interview themes/questions) for my #DClinPsy #thesis.
It will be a qualitative study looking at prioritisation of waiting lists in eating disorder services. Being an expert by experience could include... /1
Could I be added to the list please?
21.11.2024 22:30 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm honoured to be launching this comprehensive briefing paper on FND neuropsychological and psychological management, across the lifespan, with a UK focus but global relevance - thanks to my fantastic colleagues on the Division of Neuropsychology Policy Unit working group ๐๐๐
21.11.2024 17:10 โ ๐ 40 ๐ 12 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 0Oh I'm obviously not with it. You're right, it is 0.8 ๐
21.11.2024 21:53 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0SRMR isn't, it needs to be below 0.06 to fall within the COSMIN threshold.
21.11.2024 21:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thank you!
I've emailed them but not sure if I'll get a response. They have a meeting on the 19th of December which I'll attend but was hoping to get an answer before then.
My supervisor believes this proves some weak evidence of unidimensionality, but we werenโt sure if this interpretation aligns with COSMIN guidance.
21.11.2024 19:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Another measure used a 3-factor model with the following results:
ฯยฒ(48) = 182.22,
CFI = 0.937,
TLI = 0.913,
RMSEA = 0.060.
These don't meet sufficient criteria. However, they reported an explained variance of 62% without referencing EFA.
My supervisor thought the โORโ applies only when only one statistic is reported, but since all are reported, we're unsure if this meets the criteria. The fit indices of that measure;
CFI = 0.739,
TLI = 0.729,
SRMR = 0.063,
RMSEA = 0.052.
RMSEA is the only one that is within COSMINs threshold.
Regarding Structural validity, I understood the guidance to mean that if a measure meets any one of the criteria for CFA (CFI, TLI, RMSEA), it would be sufficient.
21.11.2024 19:31 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I'm using COSMIN to evaluate measures as part of my systematic review.
COSMIN has a table of their criteria for good measurement properties, and to determine if a measure's internal consistency is sufficient, there needs to be evidence of unidimensionality from the structural validity.
A plea for help.
Is there anyone here who has an excellent understanding of using COSMIN or measurement properties?
Particularly regarding Structural validity and internal consistency for a measure with multiple dimensions having unidimensionality.
#PsychSky #PsychSciSky #research #psychology