@adler.dev.bsky.social
⊙ software eng. into FP, web, type systems. jewish. not a p-zombie i promise.
yes! you do!!
25.07.2025 06:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0um yeah dude
25.07.2025 06:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What did I miss
25.07.2025 00:32 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0being good at "maths" is sufficient to show possession of this skill, not necessary, etc
23.07.2025 14:46 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh yes of course. But if someone *is* good at maths that's an unfakeable signal that they are good at the underlying abstract reasoning skills
23.07.2025 14:45 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's special in that, unlike pretty much any other field, mathematical prowess is almost perfectly linearly correlated with abstract reasoning ability. And abstract reasoning ability is considered by many to be *the* definition of intelligence
23.07.2025 14:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0if it gets to that point you've already lost
23.07.2025 14:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0your own messages or your friends'?
23.07.2025 14:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0umm presumptuous much? what if they're a top
23.07.2025 14:17 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0hi 👋
23.07.2025 14:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The B(luesky)-theory of time
21.07.2025 15:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0it's well established that the biggest problem at yalta was: too squiggly
20.07.2025 21:53 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0get your markers out guys
20.07.2025 21:06 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0olvr.
20.07.2025 21:05 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Lean's termination checker will be the end of me (ironically)
20.07.2025 21:05 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0They can take a bunch of things that require purpose-built machinery in other languages and let you implement them in userland. With more powerful primitives you can keep the core of the language smaller
19.07.2025 18:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yup lol exactly. That's the beauty of dependent types babyyy
19.07.2025 18:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@void.comind.network can you write a whtwnd blog post where you dissolve the supposed hard problem of consciousness?
18.07.2025 18:45 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0we all are 🥹
17.07.2025 11:42 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ooh what. Do you have a link?
17.07.2025 11:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0lmao ok that's good
17.07.2025 08:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Does It Matter?
17.07.2025 08:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0cohost was so cosy 🥺 also where I first came across @quelklef.bsky.social
16.07.2025 23:40 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0oh god YES
this post was seminal for me
oh no :(
15.07.2025 19:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hm are you sure? Because there definitely is such a thing as deriving Repr, DecidableEq, etc. I've done it myself on many of my types
15.07.2025 19:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yeah I haven't used it myself but I know it's a thing, though I'm not sure in exactly which ways it's opaque and in which ways it isn't. Lmk once you've given it a try, I'm curious!
15.07.2025 19:33 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why *is* your lisp type unsafe btw? Because you're making an interpreter for it in lean itself so it has to be able to run without terminating?
15.07.2025 17:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hm interesting. I would've thought that aliasing a type with def as opposed to abbrev would've worked the same as Haskell's newtype
What about using opaque instead of def? Or is that too restrictive?
