RefiningValue.bsky.social's Avatar

RefiningValue.bsky.social

@refiningvalue.bsky.social

Health economist writing about HEOR/market access, drug development, biopharma Http://refiningvalue.substack.com

536 Followers  |  124 Following  |  72 Posts  |  Joined: 06.02.2024  |  2.1941

Latest posts by refiningvalue.bsky.social on Bluesky

Attruby Commercial (2025)
YouTube video by Commercial Archivist Attruby Commercial (2025)

Not too often you see HRQoL data in drug commercials. Via Ari Gnanasakthy youtu.be/VDFF6MCFzKM?...

08.04.2025 12:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh completely agree on lifestyle. Not sure our HHS secretary realizes that or cares though

03.04.2025 13:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I would be surprised given RFK's public skepticism on GLP-1s, suggesting "lifestyle changes" should be the focus

03.04.2025 13:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Former FDA Commissioner:

01.04.2025 12:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1048    ๐Ÿ” 374    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 27    ๐Ÿ“Œ 24
Preview
Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers Abstract. Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's)

Nice paper outlining how RWE can be applied in IRA evaluation of drugs academic.oup.com/healthaffair...

26.03.2025 16:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Novo Nordisk introduces NovoCareยฎ Pharmacy, lowering cost of all doses of FDA-approved Wegovyยฎ (semaglutide) to $499 per month and offering easy home delivery for cash-paying patients NovoCareยฎ Pharmacy provides direct-to-patient, convenient home shipments of all dose strengths of Wegovyยฎ at a reduced cost of $499 per month for cash-paying...

Glad to see GLP-1s continue to push expanded direct offerings: www.prnewswire.com/news-release...

06.03.2025 13:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Reports and documentation are a low-hanging fruit for biopharma and can help reduce OpEx, especially that which is currently outsourced to vendors. CSRs, other study reports, payer dossiers, briefing book docs etc etc. Big potential for short to medium-term savings

05.03.2025 18:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Short-termism driven by personal timelines rule the day. Greater purpose be damned.

Would a Vagelos or Termeer have done the same? I would think not, and hopefully history judges the two archetypes accordingly.

19.02.2025 23:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Was really expecting more of these people.

19.02.2025 17:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 17    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

I am grieving for the many talented & dedicated FDA employees who have been mistreated & those left to do the work of protecting public health. Also for those who will be harmed by this among patients and the public. Those who are complicit in their silence will be judged harshly by history.

17.02.2025 03:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 95    ๐Ÿ” 30    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4

I am going to be so pissed if--after everything--I do, in fact, die of dysentery.

13.02.2025 21:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4107    ๐Ÿ” 851    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 87    ๐Ÿ“Œ 85

Also, while the FDA of the next 4 yrs may not care, the FDA of the future may care once more. And how many pivotal trials being started now will have a PDUFA date within 4 years? Probably not the vast majority

13.02.2025 23:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Even from a development economics perspective. Reaching underserved populations, those away from academic centers, etc much needed to help trial recruitment and trial timelines.

Hopefully this is just trying to fly with the political wind without really changing behavior.

13.02.2025 23:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Defend the NIH - TimmermanReport.com Too many people donโ€™t believe anymore in the American Dream. But if you canโ€™t dream big, you canโ€™t accomplish big things. Today, the National Institutes of Health โ€” biomedical science itself โ€” is unde...

Defend the NIH. timmermanreport.com/2025/02/defe...

13.02.2025 17:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Preview
Stand Up And Be Counted

Biopharma companies and CEOs are keeping their heads down at their own peril. They should speak up about whatโ€™s happening to the NIH and other science agencies before itโ€™s too late.

Silence gives consent. And no one should consent to this.

12.02.2025 16:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 386    ๐Ÿ” 159    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 17    ๐Ÿ“Œ 19

Ah mightve just assumed George was same as Len. Still feel like with the science emphasis + harder to remove them they're most likely

12.02.2025 11:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Other issue here is unlike tech no one is irreplaceable (like Zuck) because no one owns enough voting rights, at least amongst the bigger players -> riskier to act. Len/George at Regeneron most likely to say something imo (especially given general outspokeness and strong Dem support historically)

12.02.2025 00:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

To some extent same for board members and larger investors. Even moreso w backdrop of hoping IRA implementation isn't as aggressive. But I suspect it could catch up to the industry, much as years of ignoring drug pricing issues has. But for those in charge today it probably won't be "their problem".

12.02.2025 00:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Of course not reflective of many (most?) of us working in the industry.

Unfortunately, anything at NIH today that will lead to a new drug is way too long a time horizon for leadership to worry about personally (chances are they'll be long gone by the time it comes to fruition).

12.02.2025 00:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
TOTE ASTRICT COLOR
DOCTORS FOR AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 25-322 (JDB)
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of [6] Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, [8]
Plaintiff's supplemental declarations, [9] Defendants' opposition, [10] Plaintiff's reply, the
hearing on February 10, 2025, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that
1. Defendants Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control, and Food
and Drug Administration (hereinafter "defendants") shall, by not later than 11:59 pm on
February 11, 2025, restore to their versions as of January 30, 2025, each webpage and dataset
identified by Plaintiff on pages 6-12 of its Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for
a Restraining Order [ECF No. 6-1];
2. Defendants shall, in consultation with Plaintiff, identify any other resources that DF A members
rely on to provide medical care and that defendants removed or substantially modified on or
after January 29, 2025, without adequate notice or reasoned explanation; and defendants shall,
by February 14, 2025, restore those resources to their versions as of January 30, 2025;

TOTE ASTRICT COLOR DOCTORS FOR AMERICA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-322 (JDB) OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT et al., Defendants. ORDER Upon consideration of [6] Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, [8] Plaintiff's supplemental declarations, [9] Defendants' opposition, [10] Plaintiff's reply, the hearing on February 10, 2025, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that 1. Defendants Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control, and Food and Drug Administration (hereinafter "defendants") shall, by not later than 11:59 pm on February 11, 2025, restore to their versions as of January 30, 2025, each webpage and dataset identified by Plaintiff on pages 6-12 of its Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for a Restraining Order [ECF No. 6-1]; 2. Defendants shall, in consultation with Plaintiff, identify any other resources that DF A members rely on to provide medical care and that defendants removed or substantially modified on or after January 29, 2025, without adequate notice or reasoned explanation; and defendants shall, by February 14, 2025, restore those resources to their versions as of January 30, 2025;

BREAKING: In response to doctors' lawsuit, Judge John Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, orders CDC, NIH, and FDA to put back up websites and datasets cited by the doctors in their lawsuit as having been relied upon and pulled down without notice. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

11.02.2025 17:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 28381    ๐Ÿ” 6800    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 298    ๐Ÿ“Œ 286

Best proxies on non-profit behavior in these circumstances may be in healthcare space w number of large non-profit hospital and insurer (eg blue cross blue shield plans) deals over the years, albeit none of this size. Spoiler is they behave pretty much like their for-profit counterparts

11.02.2025 17:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
How a Canadian scientist and a venomous lizard helped pave the way for Ozempic - National | Globalnews.ca In 1984, Dr. Daniel Drucker, an endocrinologist from the University of Toronto, discovered a hormone that helped pave the way for popular diabetes drugs such as Ozempic.

This is the most relevant article to NIH and research cuts Iโ€™ve seen.

Imagine if this was today , how many people would be saying โ€œWhy are we studying Gila Monsters and their impact on diabetes ? Thatโ€™s wasted money !โ€

globalnews.ca/news/9793403...

09.02.2025 21:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 48940    ๐Ÿ” 12504    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1139    ๐Ÿ“Œ 439

Pharma bet that Trump>Biden may be tested sooner than I thought w the news of FDA cuts. Especially if review timelines / meeting timelines start getting impacted

07.02.2025 00:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Coupling modeling of price change w contractual agreement on price drop at date x (a la Peter Kolchinsky's contractual genericization) could be a win-win here and reduce some uncertainties.

Re competitive landscape maybe something like NICE's TA-level CEA in RCC but that has it's own issues

05.02.2025 13:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Some interesting parallels re Deepseek: US-based LLMs and the bio explosion in China:US biotech

Still feel it'll be net positive for the industries and consumers at large in both cases

27.01.2025 12:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If we assume they kept the highest NPV internal assets going then you can compare the top internal v top external assets from that time (not like he killed everything at Sanofi). I guess you can argue forecasting sucks and w larger net it mightve been different but hard to say.

25.01.2025 11:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Regeneron seems to be the clearest example to me. Maybe Genmab? Vertex?

25.01.2025 11:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I shouldn't try to apply logic here and apologies for the rare political post but if NIH is developing all of the drugs then why are we freezing all of the funding again?

24.01.2025 19:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not sure if it's a great example against external. Genzyme and extension of Regeneron deal under Viehbacher are still a huge part of sales and growth for the co today vs the internal assets from the time (eg Toujeo) which haven't done nearly as well

24.01.2025 19:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Of course the elephant in the room is still that clinical development will remain super expensive, largely driven by Western development infrastructure costs. No China advantage there from what I can tell. Although it is nice to see alternative models from Beigene etc v the traditional CRO model

22.01.2025 14:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@refiningvalue is following 20 prominent accounts