Are we winning yet? π’
25.11.2025 17:33 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@jeffcolgan.bsky.social
Professor of International Relations and Political Science. Interests: international order, energy, climate change, historical IR
Are we winning yet? π’
25.11.2025 17:33 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0I wish I didnβt have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.
They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as βthe most openly corrupt president in American history.β /1
Who among us fully understood the extent to which the loyalty vs. competence tradeoff for government appointees was such a crucial guardrail for democracy? Few since Hannah Arendt.
24.11.2025 19:02 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 2COP30 final agreement makes no mention of fossil fuels. π
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
The current historical moment - esp. embodied by the return of President Trump - has let pundits push a need for so-called "Climate Realism".
@jeffcolgan.bsky.social & I are pleased @iojournal.bsky.social let us write our thoughts on this and subsequent trends in global climate politics. π§΅ below:
Many people think about cold in Northern Europe if the Atlantic Ocean current system #AMOC fails. But that wouldnβt be the only problem for Europe by far.
This new study shows that severe drought is another one. π
Very excited about this @iojournal.bsky.social special issue on the future of global governance and world order β many (short) thoughtful pieces, perfect for teaching!
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Me too, Chris.
#PetroAggression
www.cambridge.org/core/books/p...
"the Climate Politics Dilemma: the serious risks of climate change versus the very challenging politics of climate mitigation. Far from grappling with the hard tradeoffs, CR reifies and hardens the two sides of the Dilemma"
Good stuff @jeffcolgan.bsky.social
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Huge kudos to all the excellent senior and junior researchers working in this space who inspired us (summarising recent climate research was one of the upbeat parts of the paper), plus comments by Bob Keohane, Tyler Pratt, @hayleypring.bsky.social @sarahcolbourn.bsky.social @maxbradley.bsky.social
20.11.2025 14:13 β π 11 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Huge thank you to @laynamosley.bsky.social and @bashleyleeds.bsky.social for creating this innovative special issue to engage with timely questions. A public good for IR that took a lot of their hard work! π #IOFoGG
20.11.2025 13:57 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@climatesollab.bsky.social @cssn.org @watsonschoolbrown.bsky.social @70sbachchan.bsky.social @katemac.bsky.social @brown-ibes.bsky.social @brownupolisci.bsky.social @robinsonmeyer.bsky.social
20.11.2025 13:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 011/ We hope that this Open Access article, freely available to all, can help instructors of politics and/or environmental studies think and teach about these issues! And check out the ~20 other great articles in the special issue. #IOFoGG www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
20.11.2025 13:32 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 1 π 010/The Climate Politics Dilemma consists of two core truths: (1) climate change will be highly damaging, maybe existential; and yet (2) international politics are nationally selfish, riddled with distributional challenges down to the most local level, and routinely focused on the crisis du jour. π
20.11.2025 13:31 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 1 π 09/ International politics creates many unknowns, but one certainty is that climate change is not decelerating. Societies worldwide will face the geopolitical and institutional challenges that a warming planet presents. We sum these up as the Climate Politics Dilemma ...
20.11.2025 13:30 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 08/ Third: must understand the host of IR implications of the United Statesβ turn away from meaningful climate mitigation and the global spread of CR. Ex: Global energy and automobile markets are now being massively challenged China and others. Is the West losing the Global South?
20.11.2025 13:29 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 07/ Second: The contrast between Chinaβs and USA's national economic strategies on clean energy vividly illustrates the range of possibilities countries have. And the range compatible with the βRealistβ label (i.e., they follow a perceived national interest) shows indeterminacy of βClimate Realismβ
20.11.2025 13:28 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 06/ First: Under what conditions, how much, and how effectively are those opposed to decarbonization prosecuting their campaign against clean energy and other green technologies? This is crucial to understand why so many countries, USA most obviously, are backsliding on climate action.
20.11.2025 13:26 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 1 π 05/ Even so, @fgenovese.bsky.social and I think the emergence of this βClimate Realismβ trend highlights three topics that we need to pay more attention to: the political strategies of the anti-green coalition, the variety of national economic strategies now emerging, and the implications for IR
20.11.2025 13:26 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 1 π 04/ We extend this critique: climate βrealismβ smuggles in hidden assumptions and tradeoffs. For example: horrific consequences of future climate change would be acceptable so long as it happens to unspecified Other People. And dodges uncertainties associated with relying on unproven technologies.
20.11.2025 13:25 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 1 π 03/ As @jeremywallace.bsky.social argued @heatmap.news, this idea is problematic. Hard for USA to persuade Global South to take any costly climate action if it doesnβt have its own house in order. And there is no clear political strategy here for actually bringing a mass of conservatives on board.
20.11.2025 13:25 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 1 π 02/ The new βclimate realismβ rightly sees the failure of Paris and argues for policy in that light. But to βrise above partisanship,β it proposes a Faustian bargain: give up on most near-term climate policies in the hope of getting conservatives' support long-term climate action.
20.11.2025 13:23 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Bill Gates, Tony Blair, CFR are rethinking climate change in the Trump era: more "realistically." Can we dismiss this trend or do we need to understand what it means global climate politics? π§΅
@fgenovese.bsky.social and I write for @iojournal.bsky.social
#IOFoGG
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
One for the ages π±
18.11.2025 23:40 β π 2580 π 586 π¬ 126 π 43Alas: even if Anthropic stole your work, you can only make a claim if your book was registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Most Canadianπ¨π¦ publishers don't (or didn't), because the legal copyright exists even without registration. So Anthropic gets away with it ... unless there's a new lawsuit?
18.11.2025 22:27 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0ππ―
18.11.2025 22:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The International History and Politics Section of @apsa.bsky.social is accepting nominations for the Jervis-Schroeder Best Book Award and the Outstanding Article Award. Nominations are due by January 31, 2026. More information here: connect.apsanet.org/s34/nominati...
18.11.2025 16:45 β π 8 π 7 π¬ 0 π 0#Irony
17.11.2025 20:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0As dozens of frog species have declined across Central America, scientists have witnessed a remarkable chain of events: With fewer tadpoles to eat mosquito larvae, rates of mosquito-borne malaria in the region have climbed, resulting in a fivefold increase in cases. https://wapo.st/4paBuuT
The International Criminal Court is ditching Microsoft Office, saying itβs too dependent on US tech, in favor of Open Desk, a German open source alternative.
The move comes after Microsoft revoked ICC head Karim Khanβs email access when he was sanctioned by the US for the warrant against Netanyahu.