It would be nice If you could tell your opinion in a QnA on Edward Luttwak and Geoeconomics.
11.05.2025 23:43 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@robertramcin.bsky.social
Vox clamantis in deserto.
It would be nice If you could tell your opinion in a QnA on Edward Luttwak and Geoeconomics.
11.05.2025 23:43 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If by โshitโ you mean your ideology youโre right.
17.02.2025 16:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm sorry but what do you think was the water quality in pre-industrial societies ?
17.02.2025 16:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sorry for understanding economics.
17.02.2025 16:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm Keynesian,read the general theory,and Iโm not the one restarting a debate that ended month ago but sure Iโm the psychopath in that conversation.
17.02.2025 13:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Funny how you people never stand up to your crazy claims and get frustrated when someone actually do that.
17.02.2025 13:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yes it has objective value.What gives.
17.02.2025 13:13 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No.
17.02.2025 13:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1I suppose you mean public utility.Itโs simply a good that has objective rather then subjective economic value.
17.02.2025 13:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0They are arguing against that.Iโm not.
17.02.2025 13:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If we pay Dave then itโs not for free.Youโre just making my point dumbass.
17.02.2025 13:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I may be retarded but atleast Iโm not petty enough to get into arguments that ended 2 month ago.
17.02.2025 13:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Bulgaria definitely had the coat of arm of all time
21.01.2025 16:30 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If only you could flip American mentality upside down and make house ownership easy and car ownership hard.
20.01.2025 15:41 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thatโs sad.
30.12.2024 00:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I think I finally beat math anxiety.
10.12.2024 15:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is certainly a painting of all time.
03.12.2024 12:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 05 minutes.
02.12.2024 20:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I donโt consider people born between 1997 and 2003 to be zoomers.I know they are technically but they are very different.
02.12.2024 13:12 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Millennials are right,zoomer suck at computers.My classmates couldnโt find the home button on a computer.
02.12.2024 12:19 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maybe read book about Econ and psychology before reading wacky socialist doctrine,Marx did.
25.11.2024 08:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What the fuck are you talking,about people answer to incentives,whether they are an individual or in a group,you can only externalized them by making someone else pay,which is what you should be arguing,but no,youโre economically illiterate so you think we can wave a wand and undo human psychology.
25.11.2024 08:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0WTF of course people had incentives before the industrial era,nobody snap their finger to make it happen,carrying water was a Fucking job en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_c... also have you seen the kind of water they drank back then,have fun going back and catching cholera you moron.
25.11.2024 08:42 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Atleast be original when you are insulting me.
24.11.2024 21:04 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0As far as I love human rights the ยซย natureย ยป that you love doesnโt give a shit about them.
24.11.2024 21:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Naturally accuring water is still free dumbass,you can get all the rain water you want,but if you want people to give you stuff that doesnโt exist naturally(clean water,food) you either need a carrots(money) or a stick(slavery).Your ideal world where things get to you magically is stupidly childish.
24.11.2024 21:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0If my job is to collect,clean,package and distribute water to your house and I donโt get anything in return Iโm gonna do something else and youโll have to do it yourself.This is Econ 101(also profit is the wrong word here you talk about margins which are usually very low for water)
24.11.2024 20:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0As opposed to your ideal world where someone would be forced to make your water drinkable without any compensation or ability to expend their operations(in the real world water companies have very small margins anyways but youโre economically illiterate so you wouldnโt know)
24.11.2024 20:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1I would need to get payed a lot for this to happen,youโll eat boots for free.idk whoโs better at the end.
24.11.2024 18:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0People will obviously have a lot of job if there where no business owners,because if you think about it you would have to do yourself all the things you where paying for(or more likely not get them at all).
24.11.2024 18:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0