Suharto*
29.12.2024 22:26 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@mxcxsx.bsky.social
Suharto*
29.12.2024 22:26 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0he also gave Sukharno carte-blanche to murder Timors.
29.12.2024 22:25 โ ๐ 22 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0building a nuclear reactor
05.12.2024 11:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0tier 1 south korean special forces in their 100k+ dollar gear walking into parliament just to leave half an hour later
03.12.2024 17:35 โ ๐ 315 ๐ 44 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 2Ruairi Fahy cuts at the government candidates, saying "people are suffering, people are dying, and they're sitting here acting like they're not in power"
I don't watch boxing, but that really should be a killer blow.
I mean, that's exactly what's happening and that's exactly what they're doing.
let's hope you fall down a flight of stairs tomorrow
20.11.2024 02:25 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0watching the Limerick GE debates to farm clips...
bro quit yapping about putting the debate together lol get it on
or "rent controls" instead of the abolition of commodity production in housing?
This was my major takeaway from today's debate.
#RTEUpfront #PBP #peoplebeforeprofit #socialdemocrats #socdems
himself to that extent well enough, but I think this needs to bleed further into PBP agitation. We all know that we aren't another social democratic radical party akin to SYRIZA or Podemos, so why should we be caught in the same weeds as them? Why should PBP advocate for "affordable housing" -
19.11.2024 00:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0allusions of taking power in the state and reforming it into something fairer; we should be nailing the difference that is that we want to completely abolish the current state of things. Tonight's performance from Richard Boyd Barrett is good in that regard, I think he managed to differentiate -
19.11.2024 00:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0the fact that we recognise the role of the class as the leader in the achievement of that maximum ideal that differentiates us from social democrats. It's why I feel that PBP really does need to lean into that more heavily and stop being bogged down in policy debates; we don't operate under their -
19.11.2024 00:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0but rather, a top-down policy. I feel that this is anti-democratic in a sense and also it is a bit of an indictment of social democracy vs. revolutionary socialist doctrine. we are both advocating for similar minimum demands, its the fact that socialists advocate for the revolutionary maximum and -
19.11.2024 00:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0to treat people who are suffering from the various crises they're experiencing as numbers in an issue to be solved. the info dump of statistics is indicative of this, they don't want or at least, don't recognise the fact that they aren't giving people a grand mission to aspire towards -
19.11.2024 00:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0i feel that the SocDems focused too heavily on statistics rather than ideals at first principles in today's debate. The effects of social democratic technocratism (stemming from middle-class politics tending towards wonkishness) has doomed SocDem party higher ups and bureaucrats - [contd in replies]
19.11.2024 00:24 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0