Jeanne's Avatar

Jeanne

@jeannestradiol.bsky.social

15 Followers  |  20 Following  |  32 Posts  |  Joined: 07.10.2025  |  2.2626

Latest posts by jeannestradiol.bsky.social on Bluesky

i love you

25.01.2026 12:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hahahahaha

09.01.2026 23:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ouugggghhhhh

04.01.2026 20:58 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

HI FRIEND

25.12.2025 18:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Merry Christmas!

25.12.2025 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I love him but also I respect the space of spicy cats!

23.12.2025 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I was blocked for liking your posts lol

18.11.2025 06:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

whatever you do, do not look up germaine greer or her views on male minors

18.11.2025 06:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He identifies as a man but still takes estradiol despite boosting claims that it's harmful. He also had a botched vaginoplasty of some kind, so that is essentially where his resentment comes from.

18.11.2025 06:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This does not provide evidence of a social contagion. It provides evidence that more people are identifying with a transgender related identity.

15.11.2025 06:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 13.11.2025 01:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

His PhD thesis was on spider societies lol

13.11.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You are making a circular argument. Currently there is no methodologically sound data showing evidence of social contagion.

13.11.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This data does not provide conclusive evidence for social contagion due to the nature of the surveys and their methodology. Go back to writing about the evolution of spiders! You were actually good at that.

13.11.2025 01:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think even if we had the highest quality of research concluding that trans women had no advantage they would still claim they did and move goalposts simply because they hate us

13.11.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

10 years and we still learn new things

11.11.2025 04:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

my goat

08.11.2025 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The woke rebound is gonna hit so hard, I don’t think the anti-woke people will ever recover

18.10.2025 07:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

When people stop responding after I correct something they were wrong on, I assume it’s out of embarrassment because they didn’t actually read it.

16.10.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Evil

15.10.2025 04:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s so terrible. Do you think non-GnRH testosterone blockers would be a better option? I feel like we could make better progress with that.

15.10.2025 04:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you had been puberty suppressed/given hormones, with facial feminization surgery, breast augmentation, and a better vaginoplasty procedure than penile inversion, you would likely be much better off than you are now.

15.10.2025 00:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Studies and anecdotes show that adult trans women who were puberty suppressed are thriving, including the studies in this article. You operate under the bias of your own personal experience (never puberty suppressed, not thriving).

15.10.2025 00:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Always check the data when people like this send you papers claiming these things, because they will be completely incorrect.

14.10.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you actually read the sources it references, they don't actually back up the claims of the narrative review!
bsky.app/profile/jean...

14.10.2025 17:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not to mention other half truths or outright lies the paper claimed. Since it's a narrative review, not a systematic review or anything helpful, it's pretty much allowed to do that. I can also help you understand more about what the paper lied about/misinterpreted. Been at it for a long time.

14.10.2025 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

The section on cognitive function claiming a decline in advanced age inaccurately sourced a presentation of the study instead of a link to the actual data, the conclusion of which did not link cognitive decline to estradiol, despite the paper claiming it did.

14.10.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The studies referenced in this paper don't actually support the conclusions of the paper, I don't think you read them. For example, the section on stroke and cardiovascular risks was sourced from older methods and the majority of the cohort was overweight or obese.

14.10.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

No.

14.10.2025 17:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

tbh if i looked like him i might hate myself too

07.10.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@jeannestradiol is following 20 prominent accounts