Paul C's Avatar

Paul C

@liddlevoice.bsky.social

Durham born, Scotland resident. Life partner ‘taken’ by MND in 2019. Humanist. Slow motorcyclist. NUFC. Posts might include poems and piffle, occasionally pics, politics and other things beginning with p

864 Followers  |  179 Following  |  124 Posts  |  Joined: 25.08.2023  |  2.0461

Latest posts by liddlevoice.bsky.social on Bluesky

Paper Dolls
YouTube video by Dougie Bee Paper Dolls

Sorry for wrong link in previous post (now deleted).
This is my downstairs neighbour’s solo project. I love it (sound up)

Paper Dolls youtu.be/iiLb4CLwqfg?si… via @YouTube

14.02.2025 20:39 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Told it might be a Godin 🤔

12.02.2025 09:12 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Black electric buoys with no obvious conventional pick ups

Black electric buoys with no obvious conventional pick ups

@stigjones.bsky.social Any ideas on this guitar? Played tonight at the Link and Pin blues session (Woy Woy NSW)
@darkdoorstep.bsky.social suggested I ask you

12.02.2025 09:04 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Absolutely so 👏

26.11.2024 22:50 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Like us!!! 🙄

26.11.2024 22:44 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Watching Only Connect from last night. Nomination for Best Team Captain Quote of the series goes Crunchers’ captain for:
‘I love a bit of calculus’

26.11.2024 22:28 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I know exactly what you mean, Richard. X has irretrievably changed for the worse but the richness it used to have isn’t yet evident on Bluesky. I do miss the old days 😢

26.11.2024 22:23 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

For anyone confused by multiple red herrings being thrown into the debate on assisted dying this interview is certainly worth a listen. Kim Leadbeater addresses the issues head on with eloquence and logic.

25.11.2024 14:20 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Thanks, Col. I’m still finding my feet here but everything good. I hope you’re OK

24.11.2024 19:03 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Exactly so. I agree there are concerns to be addressed in the legislation. But the need to improve our palliative care provision is not an argument against this law change. It is not an either/or debate.

24.11.2024 10:22 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You are right, Jenny. The various voices raised against this law change (from Gordon Brown to this waste of space MP) all seem to have God in the background. They conflate and confuse arguments, but this is essentially a simple issue: a personal right and choice when faced with terminal illness.

24.11.2024 10:02 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

There are few issues on which I profoundly disagree with Gordon Brown. The basic human right to ‘Assisted Dying’ in cases of terminal illness is one of them.

23.11.2024 10:18 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Lose the chorizo 😕

21.11.2024 10:53 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
this letter to the FT says: 


	Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
	https://www.ft.com/content/ab358521-8d7e-424a-92c7-349155b08e79

	Far from “protecting the family farm”, as claimed by Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers’ Union (Opinion, FT.com, November 5), the inheritance tax loophole on farmland, introduced in 1984, simply pushed up the price of land without improving returns to active farmers.

This is because, like most agricultural subsidies, the value of the relief was capitalised into land values. As tax planners cottoned on to its role as a licence to avoid IHT, they advised their super-rich clients to buy land and take advantage of it. In the 20 years to 2012, the price of farmland increased fourfold.

This turned landowning farmers into millionaires but — especially since land represents a cost of production — did no good to the incomes of food producers. It created impoverished millionaires who claimed a need for more support. At the same time, because more expensive land had to be squeezed even harder for the last drop of revenue, the environmental damage caused by intensive agriculture was made worse. Taking at least some of this tax loophole away will do no harm to family farmers but will help both public revenues and the environment.

Just a shame the relief was not wholly abolished.

Paul Cheshire
Emeritus Professor of Economic Geography
London School of Economics, London N7, UK

this letter to the FT says: Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour. https://www.ft.com/content/ab358521-8d7e-424a-92c7-349155b08e79 Far from “protecting the family farm”, as claimed by Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers’ Union (Opinion, FT.com, November 5), the inheritance tax loophole on farmland, introduced in 1984, simply pushed up the price of land without improving returns to active farmers. This is because, like most agricultural subsidies, the value of the relief was capitalised into land values. As tax planners cottoned on to its role as a licence to avoid IHT, they advised their super-rich clients to buy land and take advantage of it. In the 20 years to 2012, the price of farmland increased fourfold. This turned landowning farmers into millionaires but — especially since land represents a cost of production — did no good to the incomes of food producers. It created impoverished millionaires who claimed a need for more support. At the same time, because more expensive land had to be squeezed even harder for the last drop of revenue, the environmental damage caused by intensive agriculture was made worse. Taking at least some of this tax loophole away will do no harm to family farmers but will help both public revenues and the environment. Just a shame the relief was not wholly abolished. Paul Cheshire Emeritus Professor of Economic Geography London School of Economics, London N7, UK

letter to the FT

12.11.2024 19:09 — 👍 627    🔁 289    💬 15    📌 18

It’s great. Some of those early episodes are eye opening for me. I think you will know a lot of the artists mentioned but some of the interactions between artists, writers and producers are really interesting.

18.11.2024 21:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Yeh I know. I was just being flippant. Anyway, I’m pleased you managed to get upright again. 🤗

18.11.2024 19:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Followed this thread, Stig, sorry about your ‘incident’.
At what point do we stop saying ‘I fell over’ and start saying ‘I had a fall’?
Has it to do with age?

18.11.2024 19:03 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Sign outside football ground Annan v Kelty Hearts

Sign outside football ground Annan v Kelty Hearts

Stand inside Annan’s Galabank Stadium with pitch in foreground

Stand inside Annan’s Galabank Stadium with pitch in foreground

Mine too

16.11.2024 14:55 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I know! I’m seriously thinking about going to watch Annan Athletic v Kelty Hearts this afternoon at Galabank. It’s only a 25 minute drive.
Annan manager is called Wullie Gibson, gotta love it when someone opts for that abbreviation.
#NUFC

16.11.2024 14:08 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Blue and yellow flowers and matching motorcycle in front of Kelso Town Hall

Blue and yellow flowers and matching motorcycle in front of Kelso Town Hall

Love, Kelso, here’s one from a while ago when they had kindly arranged flowers to match my bike 🙄😊

16.11.2024 13:46 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I know some folks don’t consider listening to an audio book as ‘reading’ it. It’s not a distinction that is important to me. I recently listened (again) to Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies on long car journeys. The hours and miles flew by.
If asked whether I’ve read them I will probably say yes.

16.11.2024 12:17 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 0

I bought a memory-foam mattress topper this week (from M&S). Should have done it years ago.
I love it!

16.11.2024 11:59 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
a woman with a surprised look on her face Alt: a woman with a surprised look on her face
16.11.2024 11:56 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

What a beautiful start to my day here in the Scottish Borders 😊

16.11.2024 08:21 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yes, you do look quite young and virile 🙄
Morning, Stig

15.11.2024 08:22 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Indeed! I’ve been thinking about it for a while but I really don’t want to let anyone down and I’m not sure how it might work.

11.11.2024 20:48 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

The day is fighting back!

11.11.2024 08:30 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

As Rishi Sunak moves us on from 30 years of political failure by appointing David Cameron as Foreign Secretary, surely there must be governmental roles for Nick Clegg and George Osborne. 🤔🙄

13.11.2023 12:10 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Hugs, Judy 🤗

18.10.2023 20:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Wall plaque at the childhood home of philosopher Michel Foucault

Wall plaque at the childhood home of philosopher Michel Foucault

On a day out in Poitiers I came across this. Wouldn’t it be great if the world adopted some of Foucault’s thinking just now?

17.10.2023 08:29 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@liddlevoice is following 18 prominent accounts