Note to self: Remove “proficient in vegetative electron microscopy” from cv.
A weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training data
theconversation.com/a-weird-phra...
@jerry-con-angeles.bsky.social
Note to self: Remove “proficient in vegetative electron microscopy” from cv.
A weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training data
theconversation.com/a-weird-phra...
Are you pro-life? Then read this.
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/27/h...
“I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant."
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
“Building for joy”
www.wired.com/story/boring...
Here we go….
www.nytimes.com/2024/12/13/h...
"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.”
-Stephen Jay Gould
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
It’s probably a mistake to try to separate “infectious” and “genetic”.
07.12.2024 03:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 04 feet is equivalent to a modest storm surge in Florida, where the terrain is more vulnerable than here. And note that this is projected for a magnitude 9 quake, which is at the high end of the expectations. I agree though that we need to do MUCH more to prepare for it.
06.12.2024 16:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes and no. A tsunami from a mag 9 earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone would inundate areas near the strait of Juan de fuca, but would only be about 4 feet in Seattle. Not trivial for sure, and you’re right about other faults under the Sound itself.
wsg.washington.edu/could-a-tsun...
I live in this region. It's a good article but the headline overstates it. There is a huge risk of a devastating earthquake. But the actual portion of Washington state that is vulnerable to tsunamis is relatively small and not densely populated.
05.12.2024 20:03 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s bit out of date, from 2018, but this is a good graphical summary of the U.S. federal workforce. At ~0.6% of total population, it is much smaller than at its peak during WWII. Over 70% of them work in defense or security agencies.
04.12.2024 10:14 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0