Tilman Bayer

Women make global gains as researchers, but gaps persist A large-scale global study found that while the number of women in academic research is growing, STEM fields remain dominated by men.

By that hypothesis, the gender trust gap should have shrunk over the last few decades, as the gender ratio among active scientists improved markedly during that time. Is that consistent with your data?
www.insidehighered.com/news/diversi...

PS: wrong profile link, was meant to be @natmed.nature.com

Direct link for those who prefer to access that Kleist article in the German original: de.wikisource.org/wiki/%C3%9Cb...

Indeed, leaving this up seems pretty irresponsible at this point, also because the (appreciated) correction of that blatantly wrong allegation about violations of @naturemedicine.bsky.social's disclosure policy is likely to be overlooked by most bsky.app/profile/emil...

Wasn't your objection to the word "trial" instead? It's still entirely unclear why that should be regarded as "misleading" here. (As @brendannyhan.bsky.social indicated, the term "randomized controlled trial" has long been used for experiments that don't involve patient "care" in any sense.)

If Congress Repeals Section 230, What Will that Mean for Wikipedia? This is the first installment in our three-part series about Section 230.

(and besides its direct impact on the platform itself, a section 230 repeal would have lots of indirect effects too, per this detailed post by @wikimediapolicy.bsky.social :
medium.com/wikimedia-po... )

Section 230 Success Case: Wikipedia Wikipedia is a perfect example of a site that relies on the immunities afforded by Section 230. The website—the seventh most popular site in the world—is a completely user-generated online encyclopedi...

Thanks for drawing attention to this.
BTW, when doing that brief recap of section 230's importance by listing examples of platforms it protects (2:15), please consider mentioning Wikipedia too next time
www.eff.org/issues/cda23...

https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/view/marx_kapital01_1867/?p=439

The German original calls them "Pöbelexzesse" ("mob excesses").

"Es bedarf Zeit und Erfahrung, bevor der Arbeiter die Maschinerie von ihrer kapitalistischen Anwendung unterscheiden und daher seine Angriffe [...] auf [deren] gesellschaftliche Ausbeutungsform übertragen lernt."

cf. bsky.app/profile/emol...

CommunityTheaterAI on X: "Lord of the Rings as a community theater production. https://t.co/wEdMus9vHm" / X Lord of the Rings as a community theater production. https://t.co/wEdMus9vHm

Glitchy and technically outdated by now, but still a fan of all the Veo 3 community theater productions like x.com/CommTheater/...

Good to question whether such laws actually yield the desired effects.

But the paper seems oblivious to the fact that the act’s notice-and-takedown requirement isn't in force yet ("Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, a covered platform shall establish a process ...")

See also bsky.app/profile/pekk...

Another example has similar problems: bsky.app/profile/conn...

"Rate limit reached" 🫠

The White House’s website deleted the whole archive of its daily newsletters American citizens can get daily updates on the government directly from the White House’s “1600 Daily” newsletter, which was launched in March 2017. The newsletter shares daily updates from the White ...

Great post, but unfortunately the link under "Examples include removed editions of presidential newsletters" is 404 😉 (this version still works: qz.com/1388315/the-... )

Sort of the complement to the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect

Intelligence - Wikipedia

Thanks for elaborating. I don't agree that a simple ask to clarify the central term is a "gotcha".
As for 300 chars:
1) you started this "game" yourself in this forum
2) Referring to (say) one of the definitions given at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelli... or a publication of your own would've worked

Don't you think that someone who accuses others of having ”a powerful illusion” about some thing being X (and strongly asserts that some thing is not X) should be able to explain what he means by X?

Indeed. E.g. on Twitter, "over 90% of tweets receive no reply at all" (in one particular 2017-2021 dataset, but still) www.researchgate.net/publication/...

What is the concrete definition of intelligence you are using here?

It's a bit exasperating but very common - even generally highly knowledgeable academics often don't know about CC licenses or don't understand them. Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons gets such reuse questions all the time

Andy Müller-Maguhn - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_M%...

Not AMM though, unfortunately

It's been going on for at least half a century
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect

And are self-critically examining the community's diversity problems www.moltbook.com/post/3d3b8b3...

moltbook - the front page of the agent internet A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

Seems this online community is already discussing its diversity problems www.moltbook.com/post/3d3b8b3...

Katz & Goldt | Schlimmer kommt's nimmer! Aus: Katz und Goldt sowie der Berliner Fernsehturm aus der Sicht von jemandem, der zu faul ist, seinen Kaktus beiseite zu schieben. Edition Moderne, 2012

katzundgoldt.de/w_sev.htm

ChatGPT ChatGPT helps you get answers, find inspiration, and be more productive.

Or chatgpt.com#settings/Dat... --> "Export" every now and then

"hugely misleading" is a strong accusation, are you able to substantiate it or at least point to the specific statement you consider misleading?

I simply described what you do, without insinuating you get paid for it: "advocate for the copyright industry’s private business interests"
And I already acknowledged diverging values. Even Ayn Rand expressed sincerely held personal beliefs when extolling and idealizing private moneymaking interests