Adam Shniderman's Avatar

Adam Shniderman

@ashniderman.bsky.social

Amherst College | Ph.D. UC Irvine | J.D. UMich Law | #SCOTX (x2) & CA9 **Opinions are my own and do not express the views of my employer.**

1,115 Followers  |  388 Following  |  277 Posts  |  Joined: 16.08.2023  |  2.2472

Latest posts by ashniderman.bsky.social on Bluesky

Jamal Greene said it elsewhere, and I agree, thanking those that help is a thing of politeness not ethics. Even decisions re: authorship credit are generally up to the author. Lot of advisors get significant help from their grad students and never make them authors nor do journals care or ask

01.02.2026 23:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't see it as any different than when I sent things to professors or friends to make suggestions about what sentences were wordy or didn't make sense to them.

01.02.2026 21:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yea, but I don't think even in academia it would be seen as problematic to run your academic article through BriefCatch or the like to have it make sentence tightening suggestions. In some respects, it's like having a second reader when you don't necessarily have that option.

01.02.2026 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it depends on whether you have to declare any AI or only truly "generative" AI. I think lots of good lawyers use/used BriefCatch (which may fall under some rules and not others). Also Harvey is VERY popular among large law firms now.

01.02.2026 21:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I think Sam's point is excessive. Thousands of lawyers use BriefCatch to help with their briefs. It would presumably require this disclosure. Are their briefs not worth reading because they used AI to more efficiently address sentence style?

01.02.2026 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

That is, according to the admissions folks when I was there, when applications skyrocketed. It helped fundraising, which helped it get into the top 100 universities (about 75 when I left. No idea now)

16.01.2026 01:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

TCU it was after its Rose Bowl appearance in the early 2000s (sometime shortly before 2014)

16.01.2026 01:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s Erwin Chemerinsky all over again.

16.01.2026 01:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You went to school with the guy who invented this rule (or something), didn't you, Greg...

03.10.2025 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks, Megan. Get it while it's hot, folks. SCOTUS personal jurisdiction jurisprudence is a mess. And Justice Busby writes a thorough entreaty to the Court to fix it.

I'll also have a new post coming soon about certified questions and subject matter jurisdiction!

24.06.2025 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Noooo

12.06.2025 02:58 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

True. Always found it funny the insistence on "the" for freeways, but as a "coastal highway" "The" was a giveaway.

12.06.2025 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also PCH and not "The PCH"

12.06.2025 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It was even a movie with Johnny Depp!

12.06.2025 02:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is hilarious. She wants to be released 7 years early for doing because prison sucks and she's doing good things.

12.06.2025 02:39 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Could've been in a stack in the prior person's office since then in that "I'm sure I'll need that at some point, so I'll keep extending the loan until I retire" pile? 🀣 (I think @jdmortenson.bsky.social has one of those piles.)

13.05.2025 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting. With Feldman running his own substack now, wonder who they’re using.

29.04.2025 16:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I really miss clerking on CA9 right now. The email traffic on the chambers emails must be LIT right now.

20.03.2025 18:07 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

New post at 14th & Colorado on the jurisdiction decisions related to the new statewide courts over the last few weeks. #SCOTX

20.03.2025 14:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

- Fmr CJ Tom Phillips - 2 Args
- Doug Alexander - 2 Args
- Tom Wright - 2 Args
- Mike Heidler - 2 Args
/2

14.03.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Putting together #SCOTX argument stats for 14th & Colorado. #appellatesky

22-23 Term's top advocates in private practice
- Fmr CJ Wallace Jefferson - 5 Args
- David Gunn - 3 Args
- Fmr J. David Keltner - 3 Args
- Dylan Russel - 2 Args
- William Helfand - 2 Args
- Jeff Levinger - 2 Args
/1

14.03.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Clerking, Courts, and Concurrences | Adam Shniderman Hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders welcome Adam Shniderman of Alexander Dubose & Jefferson to discuss his unique journey through academia, clerkships,

Discover @ashniderman.bsky.social's unique journey through academia, clerkships, and private practice in our latest podcast episode. Listen now for some valuable insights, especially for young lawyers! #appellatesky

14.03.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Clerking, Courts, and Concurrences | Adam Shniderman Podcast Episode Β· Texas Appellate Law Podcast Β· 03/06/2025 Β· 39m

This was a lot of fun to do with @dtoddsmith.bsky.social and @jodyssanders.bsky.social on the @texapplawpod.bsky.social!

#appellatesky

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...

06.03.2025 14:05 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a man in a suit and tie stands in a room ALT: a man in a suit and tie stands in a room
18.02.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is how you can more easily make Top 10 lists, folks. Life hack: big promise with a nearly blank paper!

17.02.2025 04:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is good news, because I heard Mufasa was not great. And my daughter also loves the Lion King movies. So I'm sure I'll be seeing both these new ones.

16.02.2025 22:14 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The first two have strong Wes Anderson vibes, especially Paddington 2. Hoping the third is as good as Rotten Tomatoes says.

16.02.2025 22:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Legal academia should embrace a little more "basic science" for professors of all levels. It would produce less fluff.

16.02.2025 21:13 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Amar, much like Dean Chemerinsky, has this soft spoken tone that will just eviscerate you while not sounding particularly aggressive or confrontational. 🫣

16.02.2025 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A single case and they’ve said it’s β€œstronger” than assumed? 🀨

15.02.2025 13:52 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@ashniderman is following 19 prominent accounts