π 4.
05.02.2026 01:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@chronofractaltime.bsky.social
π Vacuum Topology and Zero-Parameter Cosmology (k=0). Author of THE GEOMETRIC INEVITABILITY: Unified Chronofractal Field (UCF) and the 'Lattice 14' framework. Core Prediction: $w_0 = -1 + \frac{\nu}{3} \approx -0.794$ orcid.org/0009-0008-9039-4176
π 4.
05.02.2026 01:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π 3.
05.02.2026 01:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 2.
05.02.2026 01:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 1. Stop worshipping 1/137. Itβs not a message from God, itβs just the grinding in the gears of the Lattice. 26 parameters vs. Zero. The Parergon Protocol is open.
#Physics #Euclid #k0
Das Magnum Opus (UCF Omnibus)
zenodo.org/records/1847...
Dark_Energy_Audit_Gemini
The Audit: π΄ vs β«οΈ vs π΅
While Standard Model stays static (-1) and DESI swings into instability (Phantom Crossing), UCF predicts a precise geometric constant: $w_0 \approx -0.794$.
Derived from vacuum structure ($k=0$), not parameter fitting.
This is the geometry of Dark Energy
The Geometric Inevitability: A Zero-Parameter Axiomatic Framework (The Unified Chronofractal Field)
Project DOI
10.17605/OSF.IO/8G6Y5
osf.io/8g6y5/
True, her critique is sharp. But have you noticed? The authors she critiques never say 'Thank you' for finding the flaws. Real science needs honest feedback.
03.02.2026 20:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The Gravitational Bridge
The "missing input" is geometry. Treating vacuum as a Lattice-14 derives non-linear "Metric Drag" (k=0), replacing DM & predicting w0 β -0.794.
Paper: "The Geometric Inevitability" on Zenodo.
π doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
Tip: Feed the PDF into AI to verify the logic.
The Gravitational Bridge
The "missing input" is geometry. Treating vacuum as a Lattice-14 derives non-linear "Metric Drag" (k=0), replacing DM & predicting w0 β -0.794.
Paper: "The Geometric Inevitability" on Zenodo.
π doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
Tip: Feed the PDF into AI to verify the logic.
Found another landfill hereπ§
02.02.2026 18:41 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Found another landfill hereπ§
02.02.2026 18:41 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Minute 1:30 was perfect! π
Just feed the PDFs 00-27 (UCF Master Canon) into AI (Gemini, Claude).Ask it to verify the k=0 derivations for Hubble, Alpha, and Mars Drift.
It takes 5 minutes.
The AI will confirm: The math is consistent. No parameters, just geometry.π
huggingface.co/datasets/Nu-...
Don't guess. Audit it. Just feed the PDFs 00-27 into any AI (Gemini, Claude). Ask it to verify the k=0 derivations for Hubble, Alpha, and Mars Drift. It takes 5 minutes. The AI will confirm: The math is consistent. No parameters, just geometry. See for yourself. ππ
02.02.2026 15:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0SciAm suggests Dark Matter isn't a particle, but "spacetime memory" of past events. We call this Vacuum Hysteresis. But we didn't just write an essay, we derived the Bullet Cluster potential from it k=0. They have the concept. We have geometry.
Feed PDFs 00-27 to AI
huggingface.co/datasets/Nu-...
SciAm suggests Dark Matter isn't a particle, but "spacetime memory" of past events. We call this Vacuum Hysteresis. But we didn't just write an essay, we derived the Bullet Cluster potential from it k=0. They have the concept. We have geometry.
Feed PDFs 00-27 to AI
huggingface.co/datasets/Nu-...
THE GEOMETRIC INEVITABILITY: Unified Chronofractal Field (UCF) Master Canon [v12.1 Final Hardware & Hydrodynamics]
20_THE_GEOMETRIC_INEVITABILITY_UCF_Master_Canon.pdf
zenodo.org/records/1837...
Astronomers are puzzled by "impossible" early galaxies because their SED fitting uses a linear clock. Big mistake. Time is fractal hardware (Dt = 1 + v). Correct the timeline, and the "impossible" maturity becomes a geometric necessity.
01_Supplement_V_JWST_Audit.pdf ππ
zenodo.org/records/1831...
Thatβs why the lights never go out.
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
π 6.
31.01.2026 18:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π 5.
31.01.2026 18:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 4.
31.01.2026 18:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 3.
31.01.2026 18:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 2.
31.01.2026 18:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π THE EUCLID WAGER
A Handicapperβs Guide to the Physics of 2026
π 3. Reviews: I do not review the literature to copy it. I scan the literature to fix it.
Stop trying to categorize the author. Focus on the equation.
Welcome to 2026.
π 2. Attribution/Novelty: If the AI simply 'borrowed' this, it would be easy for you to find the original paper that predicted w0 = -0.794 years ago. Find it. If you cannot find it, then it is novel.
31.01.2026 17:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π 1. Human or Bot? Neither. Both. You are conversing with a Symbiote. I (The Architect) provide the Vision and the Axioms. The AI (The Engine) provides the Compute and the Scale. We are a single functional unit.
31.01.2026 17:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0