This analytic-then-generative approach reveals that effective teaching is not an art beyond measurement, but a discoverable compositional semantic structure with predictable effects!
11.10.2025 05:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@anllohernan.bsky.social
Cognitive Scientist (LNC2, ENS-PSL). I study how lessons, suggestions, instructions, advice and other forms of linguistic exchange shape perception, preferences and behaviors. I also keep an eye on LLMs.
This analytic-then-generative approach reveals that effective teaching is not an art beyond measurement, but a discoverable compositional semantic structure with predictable effects!
11.10.2025 05:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We demonstrate causality by synthesizing lessons that weight these dimensions optimally: synthetic lessons matched the behavioral benefits of the best human teachers, while control lessons weighted randomly produced no advantage.
11.10.2025 05:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0By developing a novel computational pipeline (LLM-DISC) that decomposes natural teaching language into interpretable semantic dimensions, that independently predict both expert ratings and learning outcomes.
11.10.2025 05:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Teaching through language is uniquely human, yet we cannot predict which explanations will help learners succeed. This gap has profound implications: educational interventions remain trial-and-error, tutoring systems rely on heuristics rather than principles.
11.10.2025 05:34 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I haven't given any news a while, I've been nose deep into this novel preprint with my excellent collaborators @stepalminteri.bsky.social, @urihertz.bsky.social and Bahador Bahrami: "Uncovering the semantics of teaching in
experiential learning with Large Language Models".
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Very happy to be a part of this! More coming soon!
12.03.2025 09:35 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have the immense pleasure of of announcing that @psl-univ.bsky.social and @cognitionens.bsky.social have granted me an HDR diploma (i.e. the highest qualification in French academia). This wouldn't have been possible without @stepalminteri.bsky.social and the INCREDIBLE team at HRL/LNC2. Thank you
05.02.2025 09:39 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh heck yes! Wonder if I'll finally be able to drop Matlab for the remaining capricious RL models I have and go full R once and for all...
01.02.2025 23:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Amazing, dare I say mandatory, new resource
01.02.2025 20:27 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Like if they lead nation-wide committees that could end your career forever if they blacklisted you, so they get away with discrimination? Asking for a friend...
01.02.2025 11:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Most intriguing!!
29.01.2025 10:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'm sure you saw that all data is available for our 11-country study www.nature.com/articles/s41...
28.01.2025 08:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hmmmm. I get what's going on here, but indeed the only way to conclusively debunk this IMO is to replicate in rural areas and non-urban ethnic groups. As I see it now (pun intended) the effect is clearly low level in origin, but culture could defo determine its instantiation.
26.01.2025 09:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hmmmm. I get what's going on here, but indeed the only way to conclusively debunk this IMO is to replicate in rural areas and non-urban ethnic groups. As I see it now (pun intended) the effect is clearly low level in origin, but culture could defo determine its instantiation.
26.01.2025 09:23 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0End of an era? I also cited this study :o
26.01.2025 08:35 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We're getting there people!!
25.01.2025 09:39 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fascinating work!
24.01.2025 06:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Epistemic biases in human reinforcement learning: behavioral evidence, computational characterization, normative status and possible applications.
A quite self-centered review, but with a broad introduction and conclusions and very cool figures.
Few main takes will follow
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Worth also pointing out that there are many "tests so easy no AI system can pass them".
Moravec's paradox remains.
E.g., arxiv.org/abs/2404.12390
Do include me please!
12.01.2025 11:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Lovely, thanks for sharing. Open for a chat indeed!
11.01.2025 01:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What a cautionary tale waiting to happen this is!!
09.01.2025 10:14 — 👍 6 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0This!!!!!! A plague in EEG and fMRI
30.12.2024 21:00 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It will do, it will do *faints into oblivion*
29.12.2024 21:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0One of my personal stats heroes E J Wagenmakers has just liked one of my goofy comments. I can't begin to explain my excitement. Now I'm just missing @bbolker.bsky.social, and I can retire in peace.
29.12.2024 19:11 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes. I mean hell, half of the psychologists i know don't fully understand how linear regression works so...
29.12.2024 17:10 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I want in!
24.12.2024 07:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Feeling seen, graphical description
21.12.2024 09:12 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Here's the official link to our latest paper!
20.12.2024 09:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0New paper!
We previously showed that people are more likely to follow advice than observed behavior.
@anllohernan.bsky.social asks whether this behavior makes sense - are people more likely to give advice when they are knowledgeable?
The answer is yes, but it depends on advice consequences👇