Ali

Exactly, it's like we're regressing. We've been trying to break those stereotypes for decades and now we seem to be enforcing them again.

Do you have links to support your assertion that gender critical people are saying this attack implicates all trans women and are using it to justify GAC bans?

Just that reporting should be accurate. If someone's sex is not relevant, don't report it. If it is relevant, report it accurately. This has nothing to do with GAC, it's just about reporting the facts of a crime accurately.

I could go all pedantic and say that does not represent a solvable cube, but making one would involve some serious dedication and what's there is already impressive enough.
Nice work.

Obviously I'm not claiming to know the mind of a mass shooter, but...

Surely when going on a killing spree, you'd naturally wear the most practical of clothing you have to hand. Unless you're deliberately dressing to advertise your conformance to some stereotype?

If their sex is important enough to report on, then it is important enough to report on accurately. That is all.

I believe it's true that the police (mis)identified him as a women. What the guardian did wrong was to wait 10 more paragraphs before correcting that.

Gender critics are not saying this implicates all transwomen, just as most mass killers being male does not implicate all men. But this specific perpetrator was male.

I would like to assume that they described the sex correctly. I don't know why they would feel the need to describe the clothing, do they tend to do that with male mass shooters?

‘The normal should be darkness’: why one Belgian national park is turning off ‘pointless’ streetlights The radical project is an attempt to preserve wildlife in one of Europe’s most light-polluted countries, but can they persuade local people they will still feel safe?

‘The normal should be darkness’: why one Belgian national park is turning off ‘pointless’ streetlights

I ❤️ this analogy.

Superb tool, but some of the groupings seem a bit 'people's front of Judea'.

Indeed.

« Je ne suis pas une trans » : la boxeuse algérienne Imane Khelif révèle avoir pris un traitement hormonal avant les JO de Paris 2024 Accusée d’être un homme par de nombreuses personnalités, dont Donald Trump et Elon Musk, la championne olympique est revenue mercredi sur la

Thanks. Found a link:
www.leparisien.fr/sports/je-ne...

I do have sympathy for the guy, he probably thought he was female right up into puberty. To find out you are not the sex you thought you were has to be a shock.

Do you have a reference for that quote?

I apologise, I failed to detect the sarcasm.

😆
I don't think anyone would have been depicting a woman like that. Trans or otherwise.

In what way is that transphobic?

Good point. I just checked and other labelled accounts do have the label on their profile page. I automatically assume it's the account that's ben labelled but maybe Cathy's isn't. In which case yes, that post didn't deserve a label.

Her entire account has the label. Everything she posts inherits it.

She could post the most anodyne cute cat picture and it would be labelled intolerant.

The GC side is definitely associated with some idiots, it's galling that one of my positions is shared with these people.

The Gender Ideology side seems to have captured many well-meaning but somewhat naive people.

Who do you think on that side is actually 'bad company'?

I agree, it would. Unfortunately I assume they felt they had to quote the secretary of state for Health and Human Services, even though the guy's an utter nutcase.

Do you want to discuss the rest of the article at all?

Cathy. The OP.

But I see you are referring to a quote in the article Cathy posted. Fair enough, I certainly would avoid quoting him. But is there actually anything wrong in the article?

Ah, there's a quote from him in the article. Yes. I'd avoid quoting him if possible. But the quote is aside from the data and advice.

Is there anything actually wrong in the article?

I don't think she did did she?

I would definitely double-check a Dr Oz assertion. But he's not the source for this quote as far as I can see.

J.K.Rowling was on the same side as Epstein?

It seems this was from 2019 and nothing whatsoever to do with Trump or his Nobel demands. Though it would be nice if politicians responded to the orange idiot like this, the caption is false and misleading. Please delete this post, it's not helping.

Thought it might be something like that.

So doesn't seem entirely unsubstantiated to me.