Emily Kubin

Check out this great new piece (so excited to see it out!!). Analysis of German political manifestos shows an increase in victimhood narratives over time (especially by more extreme parties on the left and right).

Yess! So excited to see this out. Can’t wait to cite!

We hope this project points to the merits of academic-practitioner collaboration and will encourage others to connect science to practice as well.
Finally thank you to my co-authors @Narrative 4
(Lee Keylock and Evan Barker) and
@kurtjgray.bsky.social

Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts | PNAS Both liberals and conservatives believe that using facts in political discussions helps to foster mutual respect, but 15 studies—across multiple me...

Taken together this work provides further evidence for the power of narratives in building empathy and connection, while also healing political divides (see also: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...)

Further, the program also led students to report lower affective polarization for those who disagree with them on political issues.

Using experimental methods, we find this intervention promoted empathy, civic outcomes, and many other pro-social outcomes (e.g., respect for others, perspective taking) among those in the intervention (vs. control).

The intervention taught students skills in story sharing including perspective taking, active listening, and how to share a compelling story. This intervention culminated in a story exchange between students.

This collaboration tested the efficacy of a 10-session narrative intervention developed by practitioners at Narrative 4 among 380 high school students in 5 schools in Kentucky USA.

Academics and practitioners rarely work together, but would both benefit from collaboration. Practitioners benefit via statistical testing of their interventions. Academics benefit via connecting research to practice.

Thrilled to share our new report stemming from a collaboration between academics and practitioners!

Here we show the benefits of a narrative intervention in American high schools for promoting empathy, pro-sociality and reducing affective polarization!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Right-Wing Chatbots Turbocharge America’s Political and Cultural Wars

A must read for those concerned about the polarization of truth and the rise of AI. AI can give us the "facts" we want to hear, and make it seem highly credible.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/b...

Is social media dying? How much has Twitter changed as it became X? Which party now dominates the conversation?

Using nationally representative ANES data from 2020 & 2024, I map how the U.S. social media landscape has transformed.

Here are the key take-aways 🧵

arxiv.org/abs/2510.25417

Media Exposure to Highly Skilled Immigrants and Attitudes Toward Immigration - Political Behavior Can exposure to successful immigrants in the mass media affect perceptions of immigrants and alter attitudes toward immigration? To address this question, I study the case of Ozlem Tureci and Ugur Sah...

Can media stories about immigrant success shift public opinion? Unan shows German coverage of BioNTech’s Turkish-German founders boosted support for easing immigration, evidence that positive exposure can reshape perceptions. #Immigration
Read more:
link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Many of these ideas originated with my previous research exploring the role of perceived harm and truth in shaping people's willingness to silence others
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1...

Importantly, when we (endorse) censoring opponents it drives further political division--creating a feedback loop of increasing polarization and willingness to silence opponents.

Social media and polarization feed off one another, and through a variety of processes, drive epistemic polarization. This disagreement over truth fosters peoples' beliefs that their opponents' ideas are harmful and untrue--driving willingness to censor.

Using knowledge from political psychology and communications research I develop the Social Media- Polarization-Censorship (SPC) Framework which explains how social media and polarization interact to drive political censorship

🎈Thrilled to share my first ever solo author work🎈

In this chapter I uncover the relationship between social media, political polarization, and their downstream effects on political censorship.

osf.io/preprints/os...

Congrats Mikey! This sounds super interesting.. looking forward to reading it!

Landing page for our article "Fighting fire with fire: Prebunking with the use of a plausible meta-conspiracy framing" published in the British Journal of Psychology

🚨New open access paper out in BJP special issue "Psychological Understanding of Misinformation and Disinformation in the Face of Environmental Crises"!

“Fighting fire with fire: Prebunking with the use of a plausible meta-conspiracy framing” 🧵👇 1/12
📖 doi.org/10.1111/bjop...

We're pleased to kick off the 2025 BPS Social Psychology Section Conference with a welcoming speech by our chair @swedishprotests.bsky.social and organisers @shelleymckeown.bsky.social & @nascherme.bsky.social

It was a long road with this piece but I am so happy to finally see it published! Thankful for the team effort from my co-first author @versteegenluca.bsky.social and the amazing @kurtjgray.bsky.social

This work builds off our own previous research on moral conflicts and that of the relationship literature (i.e., self-disclosure as a key driver for positive relationship building). We hope our findings provide insights into a key mechanism (self-disclosure) for future intervention development.

Finally in Study 6, we found that in general we were successfully able to teach partisans how to be more self-disclosing in cross partisan communication--driving real opponents feelings of connection, respect, and interaction with opponents.

We find self-disclosure builds felt connection between opponents on divisive issues like immigration and gun policy--thereby driving greater willingness to respect and interact with opponents

Importantly, we find that self-disclosure is beneficial not only for sharing experiences, but can also be leveraged to communicate facts. When partisans highlight how difficult it is to talk about statistics (e.g., connected to gun policy) and how rarely they do so, it bridges divides with opponents

Across 6 studies, we find that self-disclosure is powerful for building respect and willingness to interact between real opponents. When partisans self-disclose, animosity is reduced.

Building off our previous research suggesting the sharing of harmful experiences with opponents bridges divides, we delve into one of the mechanisms explaining the power of experience sharing--self-disclosure.

🚨New Pub Alert!🚨

We find that self-disclosure is a key ingredient for bridging divides between opponents. Importantly, self-disclosure is not only useful when sharing experiences but also can be leveraged to heal divisions when communicating facts.

More below 👇
journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10....

When people hear others’ views on politically sensitive topics (e.g., migration, abortion), they quickly become disrespectful or disengage. How can we express our views in such a way that they foster respect and interaction?

@emilykubin.bsky.social, @kurtjgray.bsky.social & I studied this.
🧵1/7