You should probably find better spaces to publish this stuff than evil Elsevier journals
07.11.2025 16:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@ivanscat1.bsky.social
๐ธ๏ธ ๐งฉ
You should probably find better spaces to publish this stuff than evil Elsevier journals
07.11.2025 16:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Nice, das klingt doch sehr vernรผnftig.
Vielleicht schaffen wir es doch noch abzuwenden das Europa eine digitale Kolonie wird!
That is very sad for you. However I am not sure whether "I was just doing my job. Even if it made me feel uncomfortable." Is the greatest justification of all time. Everybody has a little bit of agency.
04.11.2025 15:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0But you will just do it. For your personal reputation gain. As academics always have given in to literally all immoral demands of the publishing industry.
04.11.2025 07:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Fetter Mann means fat man in German, which makes him even sound like a weird or evil character from a Gebrรผder Grimm Mรคrchen.
15.10.2025 15:53 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We have structured data in an SQL database and know we are to make this into a "RAG chatbot", no matter how much we pleaded against it.
Embedding tabular data is most likely a complete waste of time, but i mean they pay for our time, so whatever.
One negative thing I noticed about 4.5 is that it feels like it does a lot more of "you are absolutely right! Let me ..." than the previous Sonnet version.
Maybe that stuff helps in the LMarena ratings.
I actually like this one more than the videos!
01.10.2025 15:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This will work nicely on painkillers: m.imdb.com/title/tt1822...
25.09.2025 16:56 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Public Possession is a part of this as well? Just embarrassing ๐ณ
19.09.2025 12:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Im Endeffekt ist auรer fรผr Rentenerhรถhungen und Steuergeschenke an die Gastronomie halt fรผr nix Geld da.
Fรผr diese Prioritรคten von SPD und CSU muss man Verstรคndnis haben!
They literally give away all the rights to their papers to the publishing industry without a second thought for personal reputational gain. But when the public wants access to said research that is funded with public money they see a problem.
That can't be taken seriously.
Wenn man auf Bluesky nach dem Film sucht bekommt man reihenweise genau die Kommentare die das Gegenstรผck zu diesem "Statement" darstellen.
Perfekt fรผr alle Beteiligten. Fรผr die einen Virtue Signaling an die Blase und fรผr Bully die Darstellung als mutiger Kรผnstler. Bei vรถlliger Belanglosigkeit.
Still. Currently, the US is not a safe destination for anyone outside. So if you want to include the rest of the world, your conference should be in a country with less authoritarian immigration agencies.
19.07.2025 17:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Unfortunately, they might just ask another AI to do this task for them.
31.03.2025 16:58 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0As long as scientists value the prestige derived from handing over all rights to for-profit publishers more than anything else, this is to expected.
This could quite easily be avoided by not signing agreements with these companies.
If you get government funds, the result should be openly licensed. Everything else would be deeply immoral.
If you want to keep your research private, you should get private funding.
Sorry, you are right. My reaction was too heated and over the top and not constructive at all. Will delete
08.03.2025 18:38 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I think explicitly qualitative research is much more intellectually honest than a lot of quantitative research where the data is mainly necessary to increase prestige of otherwise completely implausible hypotheses.
08.03.2025 16:08 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0May depend on the field but in our social psychology realms literally every PhD student has encountered something like this: www.theorgplumber.com/posts/statem...
In private nobody denies that the majority of the field is not reproducible, we just haggle about which parts.
Es sollte einfacher werden solche Leute zu feuern.
08.03.2025 12:20 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Peerless
soundcloud.com/otherpeopler...
Das interessante an R1 ist nicht die Weboberflรคche, sondern das es Open Weights verรถffentlicht ist und es ein Paper dazu gibt, dass das Vorgehen beschreibt.
31.01.2025 16:23 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Kleine Unschรคrfe: Das betrifft nicht um das Sprachmodell, sondern das รผber die Website erreichbare System. Die abgebildete Zensur ist regelbasiert รผber die Chatoberflรคche gelegt. Wenn man das Sprachmodell in eigener Infrastruktur oder รผber Anbieter auรerhalb Chinas ansteuert, tritt das nicht auf.
31.01.2025 16:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Does the culture you grow up in shape the way you see the world? In a new Psych Review paper, @chazfirestone.bsky.social & I tackle this centuries-old question using the Mรผller-Lyer illusion as a case study. Come think through one of history's mysteries with us๐งต(1/13):
25.01.2025 22:05 โ ๐ 1093 ๐ 423 ๐ฌ 33 ๐ 79Ist das BSW programmatisch nicht v.a. eine SED Nachfolgepartei?
Mit leichten Anpassungen an die aktuelle Zeit (der populistische Teil) wollen die doch eigentlich die DDR zurรผck, oder?
Wonderful mix. Feels like watching the sunrise at J.F Sebastian's place in Bladerunner.
soundcloud.com/sharptype/02...
How differs publishing data from "doing science"? Does writing up results in a paper keep you from "doing science" as well?
As annoying as it is, it feels like publishing is a necessary part of doing science. Without a possibility to comprehend or reconstruct it is it really proper science?
Da diese Detektoren alle erwiesenermaรen unzuverlรคssig sind, haben die angezeigten Wahrscheinlichkeiten keinerlei Aussagekraft.
03.01.2025 21:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If you have ever tried to read free books from sites like Project Gutenberg, you noticed that they can be uncomfortable to read, due to their layouts, type & occasional errors
This project takes those free books and makes them beautiful (and still free). standardebooks.org