Liwen Xue, Axel Finke, Adam M. Johansen: Online Rolling Controlled Sequential Monte Carlo https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00696 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.00696 https://arxiv.org/html/2508.00696
04.08.2025 06:53 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@ryzhang.bsky.social
PhD student in Computational Statistics and Machine Learning at STOR-i CDT, Lancaster University, UK. Research Interests: Sampling Algorithms, Bayesian Experiment Designs, Neural Amortization. https://shusheng3927.github.io/
Liwen Xue, Axel Finke, Adam M. Johansen: Online Rolling Controlled Sequential Monte Carlo https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00696 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.00696 https://arxiv.org/html/2508.00696
04.08.2025 06:53 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Really enjoyed listening to this interview with Mike Giles. Only knew him from his multilevel Monte Carlo work, and it was quite a nice surprise to learn about his contributions to CFD and experiences with industrial collaborations!
28.07.2025 09:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0we're out here simulating, visualising, thriving
15.07.2025 12:46 β π 17 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Congrats !!!
11.07.2025 11:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We've written a monograph on Gaussian processes and reproducing kernel methods (with @philipphennig.bsky.social, @sejdino.bsky.social and Bharath Sriperumbudur).
arxiv.org/abs/2506.17366
Line chart titled βWeekly Runs of RStudio IDEβ showing usage data from 2023 to 2025. The y-axis ranges from 2,000,000 to 6,000,000 weekly runs. The chart displays a cyclical pattern with regular peaks around 5,000,000-6,000,000 runs and dramatic drops to approximately 2,000,000 runs that occur periodically during holiday periods.
Is #rstats dead? I donβt think so.
10.06.2025 18:36 β π 183 π 31 π¬ 18 π 11Is it just me or does Google Scholar forbid searches via Avantiβs WiFi?
09.06.2025 09:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The talks from the Post-Bayes workshop are now available online here - youtube.com/playlist?lis... - do take a look!
29.05.2025 09:57 β π 25 π 7 π¬ 0 π 0In the interim, I wanted to advertise our YouTube channel - youtube.com/@montecarlos... - which contains recordings for the bulk of our talks so far (sites.google.com/view/monte-c..., sites.google.com/view/monte-c...). I encourage you to catch up and enjoy them over the intervening months!
28.05.2025 17:03 β π 11 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Starting from last October, we (@OnlineMCSeminar on Twitter, sites.google.com/view/monte-c...) have been running an online seminar on all aspects of Monte Carlo methods, with about ~30 talks so far. We are currently paused for the summer, expecting to return in September 2025.
28.05.2025 17:03 β π 22 π 5 π¬ 2 π 0Do you happen to have anything related to low-rank approximation / matrix sketching? Thanks !!
27.05.2025 14:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Luke Hardcastle, Samuel Livingstone, Gianluca Baio
Diffusion piecewise exponential models for survival extrapolation using Piecewise Deterministic Monte Carlo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05932
Demo for the sampler from our recent paper
discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-a-non-...
Keen to read this:
arxiv.org/abs/2504.13322
'Foundations of locally-balanced Markov processes'
- Samuel Livingstone, Giorgos Vasdekis, Giacomo Zanella
Modern science wouldnβt exist without the online research repository known as arXiv. Three decades in, its creator still canβt let it go.
27.03.2025 10:04 β π 740 π 211 π¬ 9 π 29With Gibbs you can arbitrary choose the order you go through the coords, but in your MH that is not possible. The MH acceptance simplifies to p(x,yβ)p(xβ)p(y) / p(y,xβ)p(x)p(yβ). In the case where your x and y are independent (so your MH is also arbitrary in coord order), your MH is Gibbs.
25.03.2025 19:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Is there a ref for this?
16.03.2025 18:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0We also had some thoughts on maybe using the discrete KSD works to extend stein thinning to discrete distributions
16.03.2025 18:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Would that empirical average comparison / gauging then be equivalent to computing test statistics for hypothesis (goodness of fit) tests then?
16.03.2025 17:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Was hoping to establish some theoretical results on a good choice of window length but that did not go anywhere (yet
16.03.2025 17:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I was working with Lanya on some extensions to Stein thinning by doing a window based scan to detect convergence (as opposed to the greedy approximation of the full minimisation objective). We implemented it and it works, but is quite fiddly wrt window length parameter.
16.03.2025 17:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In fact, I am quite curious about how one would do convergence diagnostics for non continuous targets. Donβt recall reading about much work towards this direction
16.03.2025 17:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I think there are also more recent extensions to Stein thinning made by Chris Oates, Lester Mackey et al
16.03.2025 17:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I would recommend these two reviews: arxiv.org/abs/1909.11827 and arxiv.org/abs/2103.16048.
16.03.2025 17:43 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Subsequently, arxiv.org/abs/1802.09188 extended this idea and provided additional error bounds of ULA.
16.03.2025 17:39 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For ULA bias, there is this paper arxiv.org/abs/1802.08089 that describe it as a time discretisation of Wasserstein gradient flow, which helps us to explain the existence of bias.
16.03.2025 17:38 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Also was made aware of the Probabilistic Richardson Extrapolation work by Chris Oates et al by @adriencorenflos.bsky.social - is that related to multilevel?
16.03.2025 17:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Do you also know about variance reduction in the context of SDE numerical schemes? Other than the multilevel stuff
16.03.2025 17:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0There seem to be many standard textbooks that have a chapter or two on variance reduction techniques. But am seeking a more modern coverage (if there exists any).
16.03.2025 17:14 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0