Nicole Scro's Avatar

Nicole Scro

@nscro.bsky.social

land use attorney turned real estate developer. Gallifrey, LLC, www.gallifreybuilds.com Education Cmte, Cville Area Assn Realtors (CAAR) Cville Housing Advisory Committee (HAC) Places29 Rio Community Advisory Cmte (CAC) poly. πŸ’— bi/pan. she/her.

231 Followers  |  293 Following  |  32 Posts  |  Joined: 21.11.2023  |  2.251

Latest posts by nscro.bsky.social on Bluesky

lol what is this and why

05.12.2025 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Very cool!

24.11.2025 17:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Infill!

23.11.2025 00:38 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A red sign with silver lettering: we will not leave each other behind.

A red sign with silver lettering: we will not leave each other behind.

#TDOR

20.11.2025 22:47 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

every tiny crumb that leaks out is a career ending bombshell and we’re all just supposed to go on with our lives while our elected representatives shrug and tell us there’s nothing to be done about the president’s involvement in a child sex trafficking operation

12.11.2025 14:56 β€” πŸ‘ 4731    πŸ” 1489    πŸ’¬ 55    πŸ“Œ 23

So traffic infractions & misdemeanors are recorded by general district courts. They share their files with DMV, who then imposes additional fines/revocations etc.

if you don’t have a license, you’re not impacted by DMV’s additional penalties, but you still have an infraction on file with the GDC.

12.11.2025 04:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good morning Virginia! Good morning 5th district folks! Polls are open. You know what to do. It’s a great day to vote!

04.11.2025 11:57 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Hey πŸ‘‹πŸ½ Cville peeps! If you haven't voted yet, be sure to get out on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4 to vote. Voting is, admittedly, a rather limited way to build political power, but it's still a really important one.

Here's the sample ballot for Cville. Next up, I'll share who I'm voting for, and why

03.11.2025 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a close up of a woman 's face with a gray sweater on . ALT: a close up of a woman 's face with a gray sweater on .

Anonymized land gentry

02.11.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Sixplex!

31.10.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

24.10.2025 01:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

this also drives me insane, this idea that it is the most normal thing in the world for a young (white) man to have a nazi curious phase. it isn’t!

21.10.2025 13:27 β€” πŸ‘ 7400    πŸ” 960    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 241

Oh interesting β€” adding Children of Men to my rewatch list.

20.10.2025 01:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Omg I am obsessed with this movie!!!

20.10.2025 01:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Two tons of bronze ingots, from melting down Charlottesville’s statue of Robert E. Lee, are now on display in the LA Museum of Modern Art β€œMonuments” exhibit. The @jsaahccville.bsky.social Swords Into Plowshares project will select an artist to use the bronze to create public art for Charlottesville

18.10.2025 00:48 β€” πŸ‘ 462    πŸ” 146    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 4
Policy Briefing Summary
City Council
Regarding: Resolution Authorizing Agreement to Settle White v. Charlottesville
City Council
Staff Contact(s): John Maddux, City Attorney
Presenter: John Maddux, City Attorney
Date of Proposed
Action:
October 20, 2025
Issue
Whether to authorize an agreement to settle White v. Charlottesville City Council, a lawsuit challenging
the legality of the zoning ordinance adopted by the City Council in December of 2023.
Background / Rule
In January 2024, several community members filed a lawsuit challenging the new zoning ordinance
adopted by City Council in December 2023. Over time, the case narrowed to two main questions:
whether the City was required to send certain traffic information to the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT), and whether the City gave reasonable consideration to factors required by
state law when adopting the ordinance. Although a trial was scheduled for September 2026, the City
and the plaintiffs have reached an agreement to resolve the case. Under the agreement, the City will
provide the requested traffic information to VDOT, and the plaintiffs will withdraw their lawsuit. As long
as the City meets its obligations, this agreement will bring the litigation to an end.
Analysis
The City remains confident that it would ultimately prevail in this matter. However, the cost of
discovery, trial, and potential appeals would be substantial for all parties, and any litigation carries
inherent risks. This proposal, where the City will provide certain traffic information in exchange for
dismissal of the case offers a practical and cost-effective path forward. Accepting this resolution will
avoid further litigation expenses and provide clarity and stability for the City’s zoning ordinance.
Financial Impact
Funds will be required to complete the necessary traffic studies for submission to VDOT, and these
costs are expected to be meaningful. However, they are anticipated to be substantially lower than the
costs the City w…

Policy Briefing Summary City Council Regarding: Resolution Authorizing Agreement to Settle White v. Charlottesville City Council Staff Contact(s): John Maddux, City Attorney Presenter: John Maddux, City Attorney Date of Proposed Action: October 20, 2025 Issue Whether to authorize an agreement to settle White v. Charlottesville City Council, a lawsuit challenging the legality of the zoning ordinance adopted by the City Council in December of 2023. Background / Rule In January 2024, several community members filed a lawsuit challenging the new zoning ordinance adopted by City Council in December 2023. Over time, the case narrowed to two main questions: whether the City was required to send certain traffic information to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), and whether the City gave reasonable consideration to factors required by state law when adopting the ordinance. Although a trial was scheduled for September 2026, the City and the plaintiffs have reached an agreement to resolve the case. Under the agreement, the City will provide the requested traffic information to VDOT, and the plaintiffs will withdraw their lawsuit. As long as the City meets its obligations, this agreement will bring the litigation to an end. Analysis The City remains confident that it would ultimately prevail in this matter. However, the cost of discovery, trial, and potential appeals would be substantial for all parties, and any litigation carries inherent risks. This proposal, where the City will provide certain traffic information in exchange for dismissal of the case offers a practical and cost-effective path forward. Accepting this resolution will avoid further litigation expenses and provide clarity and stability for the City’s zoning ordinance. Financial Impact Funds will be required to complete the necessary traffic studies for submission to VDOT, and these costs are expected to be meaningful. However, they are anticipated to be substantially lower than the costs the City w…

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is made effective as of the date of the last signature hereto (the
β€œEffective Date”), by and between G. EDWARD WHITE, SUSAN D. WHITE, ROY VAN
DOORN, KRISTI VAN DOORN, THOMAS J. HILL, Trustee of the Thomas J. Hill Trust, u/a
June 1, 2005, as amended, KEMP P. HILL, Trustee, of the Kemp P. Hill Trust, u/a June 1, 2005,
as amended, JENNY CLAY, MICHAEL BEVIER and LILLIAN BEVIER (collectively, the
β€œClaimants”) and the CHARLOTTESVILE CITY COUNCIL (the β€œCity”), each a β€œParty” and
collectively, the β€œParties.”
REASONS FOR AGREEMENT
Claimants have asserted various claims against the City in that action filed in the Circuit
Court for the City of Charlottesville styled G. Edward White, et al., v. Charlottesville City
Council, Case No. CL24-25 (the β€œLawsuit”). In the Lawsuit, Claimants’ operative pleading is
now the Amended Complaint, filed on or about December 30, 2024. The Amended Complaint
contains two Counts, and alleges that the new zoning ordinance adopted by the City on
December 18, 2023 (the β€œNZO”) was void ab initio for, among other reasons, the failure to
submit the NZO to the Virginia Department of Transportation (β€œVDOT”) pursuant to Virginia
Code Β§ 15.2-2222.1(B) and the associated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations set forth in
24VAC30-155-10, et seq. The Parties enter into this Agreement for the purpose of resolving the
Lawsuit.
TERMS
For and in consideration of the mutual promises and commitments specified herein, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each Party, the Parties agree as
follows:
1. Preparation of Traffic Impact Statement. The City agrees to prepare a VDOT
Traffic Impact Statement (β€œVTIS”) pursuant to requirements of 24VAC30-155-60. The City
shall contact VDOT to request a scope of work meeting pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60(B) (the
β€œMeeting”) within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date and shall comply with the elements and
scope for the VTIS as required by VDOT. Prior to the Meeting, unless …

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is made effective as of the date of the last signature hereto (the β€œEffective Date”), by and between G. EDWARD WHITE, SUSAN D. WHITE, ROY VAN DOORN, KRISTI VAN DOORN, THOMAS J. HILL, Trustee of the Thomas J. Hill Trust, u/a June 1, 2005, as amended, KEMP P. HILL, Trustee, of the Kemp P. Hill Trust, u/a June 1, 2005, as amended, JENNY CLAY, MICHAEL BEVIER and LILLIAN BEVIER (collectively, the β€œClaimants”) and the CHARLOTTESVILE CITY COUNCIL (the β€œCity”), each a β€œParty” and collectively, the β€œParties.” REASONS FOR AGREEMENT Claimants have asserted various claims against the City in that action filed in the Circuit Court for the City of Charlottesville styled G. Edward White, et al., v. Charlottesville City Council, Case No. CL24-25 (the β€œLawsuit”). In the Lawsuit, Claimants’ operative pleading is now the Amended Complaint, filed on or about December 30, 2024. The Amended Complaint contains two Counts, and alleges that the new zoning ordinance adopted by the City on December 18, 2023 (the β€œNZO”) was void ab initio for, among other reasons, the failure to submit the NZO to the Virginia Department of Transportation (β€œVDOT”) pursuant to Virginia Code Β§ 15.2-2222.1(B) and the associated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations set forth in 24VAC30-155-10, et seq. The Parties enter into this Agreement for the purpose of resolving the Lawsuit. TERMS For and in consideration of the mutual promises and commitments specified herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each Party, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Preparation of Traffic Impact Statement. The City agrees to prepare a VDOT Traffic Impact Statement (β€œVTIS”) pursuant to requirements of 24VAC30-155-60. The City shall contact VDOT to request a scope of work meeting pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60(B) (the β€œMeeting”) within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date and shall comply with the elements and scope for the VTIS as required by VDOT. Prior to the Meeting, unless …

Wow. The agenda is up for the 10/20 Council meeting... and it includes a settlement agreement in the White v. Charlottesville case.

The city will prepare a Traffic Impact Statement by the process in 24VAC30-155. In exchange, the plaintiffs will drop the case against the new zoning ordinance.

16.10.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 5

To live my life the way that I want to say and do whatever I please. RIP Diane.

13.10.2025 01:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sounds right.

The irony of them having more interest in harmless chalk every year versus the actual violence of A11 is never not fucked.

12.08.2025 01:17 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The after hours RMC/UVa ambassadors are always nutjobs. They’ve called the cops on me a bunch over the years but nothing has ever come of it.

Super lame they took the chalk.

12.08.2025 01:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Current board member of the Piedmont Community Land Trust asked a Charlottesville School Board member if the former principal was hired because of his race β€” β€œbased on his experience of hiring at the land trust.”

This insane thinking is local. He’s also an avid investor in the Iraqi dinar.

11.08.2025 23:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Behind the dark clouds is light

Behind the dark clouds is light

Heavy on my mind tonight is A11 and A12. Looking out the window I’m reminded that some dark clouds can have bright linings. Many of the strengths of the Cville community now were born from the dark crucible of that summer of hate

11.08.2025 23:23 β€” πŸ‘ 158    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image Post image Post image Post image

8/11/17. left chalk there.

11.08.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 36    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Eight years on Monday.

08.08.2025 22:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
08.07.2025 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As if Schragger actually knows anything about what actually happens in this City

01.07.2025 15:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If MeToo didn’t cause you to reflect on why the women in your life don’t feel safe confiding in you for help, it really should have

22.06.2025 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 188    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A few thoughts on the Jack Jouett primary. @sallyforsupervisor.bsky.social won for a few reasons: first, she had better ideas. Pro-housing policies are very popular! County politics often get stuck in the mud and she figured out how to navigate them in a forward thinking, results oriented way.

18.06.2025 11:17 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2
A sign at a protest reads β€œyou lost” next to a Confederate flag, β€œyou lost” next to a Nazi flag, and β€œyou’re next” next to a MAGA hat.

A sign at a protest reads β€œyou lost” next to a Confederate flag, β€œyou lost” next to a Nazi flag, and β€œyou’re next” next to a MAGA hat.

Let’s not mince words on exactly what the MAGA movement is.

14.06.2025 19:06 β€” πŸ‘ 10605    πŸ” 2700    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 73

this story is just a great illustration of NIMBY nihilism. at core, these people have no vision for anything. they simply oppose change for the sake of opposition. (i also think there is an element of death denial here β€”Β if i can prevent all physical changes i can deny the reality of my mortality)

04.06.2025 17:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3638    πŸ” 645    πŸ’¬ 120    πŸ“Œ 41
Public Portal β€’ CivicClerk CivicClerk events and agendas for citizens

The packet for the May 27th work session of the #cville Planning Commission is posted here https://charlottesvilleva.portal.civicclerk.com/event/2419/files/agenda/5728 (25 pages)

25.05.2025 13:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@nscro is following 20 prominent accounts