Cat (Moth Ma'am)

A poster that says Did you see: -a tent in the woods? -someone shoplifting? -a person sleeping in their car? NO YOU FUCKING DIDNT people are struggling don't make it worse

@MichellCClark: they made healthcare a commodity, education a debt trap, and housing a speculation market-then told you that poverty is a personal failing. they privatized survival and called it freedom.

That last line hits hard

*Dems' endorsed and funded candidate gets his ass handed him by the progressive candidate they did everything to smear*

Dems: Just for that, we gonna go right even harder...

*Dems move gradually further right in loser attempt to court Republicans, naturally lose because Republicans hate them and already have their guy, while continuing to alienate their progressive base*

Dems: Perhaps we went too progressive; it just doesnt poll well...

Without downloading any new pics, describe your gender.

١٤٠غ١١٨ also cran 阿 m- "Violence" in Social Movements • 111 They Will Call You Violent If your tactics disrupt the order of things under capitalism, you may well be accused of violence, because "violence" is an elastic term of. ren deployed to vilify people who threaten the status quo. Conditions that the state characterizes as "peaceful" are, in reality, quite violent. Even as people experience the violence of poverty, the torture of im-Prisonment, the brutality of policing, the denial of health care, and many other violent functions of this system, we are told we are experiencing peace, so long as everyone is cooperating. When state actors refer to "peace," they are really talking about order. And when they refer to "peaceful protest," they are talking about cooperative protest that obediently stays within the lines drawn by the state. The more uncooperative you are, the more you will be accused of aggression and violence. It is therefore imperative that the state not be the arbiter of what violence means among people seeking justice.

“The more uncooperative you are, the more you will be accused of aggression and violence.”

You'll be knocked out and then wake up having it done. You'll be a bit sore done there for a couple of days. Other than that, there is nothing to it.

One of the worst parts of getting into your middle age is that some nights you sleep really poorly for nothing reasons, and then you just have to, like, roll through the next day as if it didn't happen.

I miss bouncing back like I did when I was 20. And like nothing else.

Motion blur is an accessibility feature, and can usually be toggled as needed. Anyone upset about it can go fuck off all the way to the Sun.

No, he would be indifferent. Nurgle loves biotic diseases (and perhaps cancer), because he loves life on a quantitative level, and a single germ is just as valuable as a single human. Diabetes, though, doesn't host and spawn new microbes, so it would hold little interest for him.

It seems like the state has slowly been subsumed (over the past 50 years) by an increasing number of apocalypse cults, each with competing visions of said apocalypse, but each perfectly willing to work in concert to villainize and thwart any who dare to try and stop their inevitable doomsdays.

Twitter post/pohoto from JK Rowling who sits on what looks like yacht, taking a puff of what looks like a cigar. She holds a cocktail close to her face and looks smug as fuck. Text on tweet: I love it when a plan comes together. #SupremeCourt #WomensRights.

Text on screen: our.moral.imperative British billionaire JK Rowling has posted several gloating tweets today after the UK Supreme Court ruled that only 'biological women' legally count as women, excluding trans women from legal protections and safeguards. Rowling's vicious smear campaign against trans people in Britain has been going on for several years now and has played a major role in cultivating the extremely hostile and toxic environment that exists in the country towards trans people, particularly in the name of liberal 'feminism'. @fight_for_a_future @rowllingofficial

You all need to treat Harry Potter IP like we’re treating the Tesla brand.

Meanwhile, in the corner silently thinking about how there is now a greater-than-zero probability of me being blackbagged and gulagged in the near future, and that probability is rising a little every day, and collectively we just aren't going to do anything to stop it. (2/2)

Being a boardgamer and also transgender is really frustrating right now. The tariffs on China were a nuclear warhead on the boardgame industry, and the player community is pissed as hell and dooming over the future of the industry. (1/2)

Fight Fascism; smash it to pieces, burn the pieces, then bury and pave over the ashes.

Just remember that the Oligarchy will still be there afterwards. The Fight won't be over once things are 'back to normal', it will only be just beginning.

Fighting Oligarchy is great, don't get me wrong; always Fight Oligarchy.

But keep in mind that the US has *always* been an Oligarchy, from Day One. What's happening now is that it is now openly and fully embracing Fascism.

Is... is he not aware that the X-Men are the heroes in their stories?

Imagine comparing anti-fascist/genocide protesters to the Rebel Alliance from Star Wars and framing that as condemnation.

(Anxiously preparing for someone to site that very thing happening)

I mean, if you wanted to criticize auteur theory, go ahead; there is a lot to criticize. None of that has anything to do with the travesty that is GenAI.

The image shows a text post from a tumble user with the handle "theconcealedweapon" making an argument about the importance of protecting the rights of criminals as a safeguard against government tyranny. The post presents the following key points: If you want to prevent government tyranny, ensuring criminals have rights must be your top priority This is not meant as a joke or exaggeration Without rights for criminals, governments can simply label people as criminals to strip away their rights The post claims this has been a common tactic of tyrannical governments throughout history The post concludes that believing people who break laws should forfeit their rights is effectively supporting tyranny The argument centers on the idea that due process and legal protections for accused/convicted persons are fundamental safeguards against authoritarian government overreach.

no lies detected. #civilrights

Either that or he's just senile and so used to being obstructionist it's become his default setting.

You know things are cooked when Mitch fucking McConnell, the worst thing to come out of Kentucky (after myself), decides to do a Good Thing.

(I already follow @skepchick.org, so that one that is still worth following)

I'm done listening to people use their platforms of intellectuallism to 'both sides' people fighting to maintain their brutal supremacy with all the means afforded to them *and* people fighting for their survival using the only means available to them.

Any recommendations for a science communication YouTuber that isn't cemented down in a centrist liberal position? I just have no patience for people who claim to be pro-reason and critical thinking while stubbornly refusing to understand history and political/social science.

I've got a bunch of spare corsets if you ever want to try one.

Now I'm no longer upset they all closed down in my region.

I want to someone who gets to take care of a kitty girl...

First time getting fully dolled up in over a year. Nice to see I've still got it.