Logical Chief

Most ideologies—left, right, or religious—claim to love freedom but end up policing speech or behavior when it suits them. Hypocrisy much? Name one that doesn’t.

"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies."

No one gets away with anything, ever, so take responsibility for your actions.

The main issue with democracy is that most peoples as idiots and easily persuaded by charismatic politicians.

Communism is an unachievable utopia so you are technically correct. However it's normal to classify a country who is striving towards this unachievable goal as a communist country.
Communism/Socialism has failed miserable wherever it has been attempted.

Communism is like dropping a nucellar bomb when what you needed was a sniper.

Should we have to wait for this to be a big problem before we do something about it?
One trophy stolen by a trans attleete is one too much.

You must reread then. You clearly have no idea.

Islam is not a race, it a religion. One can not be racist against a religion.

Dude you are ignorant about the history of communism, that much is clear.

Communism can only be sustained by force and fear. That is the reason everyone that tried communism had to designate peoples at enemies ans slaughter millions, vast majority was totally Innocens. Try reading the history of USSR or communist China and wake up from this fantasy.

Yes, is that not a universally agreed upon?

There is no prime minister of America. (and no he did not)

I oppose death penalty for being the wrong class, for being successful.

So is that why communism has been so successful, or wait, no is has not. It has always been a total catastrophe where it has been attempted.

No, a rasist drunkard German named Marx taught communism. Communism is evil to the core because it ignores what motivates peoples to anything more than the absolute minimum.

A Communist is someone who reads Marx and Lenin. An Anti-Communist is someone who understands it.

I see you have no argument, just reposting mine.

Compeering growth would be equally as unfear giving one the countrys was undeveloped and was was fully industrialized.
Human suffering in the USSR was way worse with no personal freedom.
Peoples was denouncing each other until the fall of the USSR and the Gulags was active to the end.

Who said anything about the US?
It's you who brought up the US.

The US far outstripped the USSR in quality of life. In 1980, US GDP per capita was roughly $12,000, while the USSR’s was $6,000–$7,000 (PPP-adjusted). Soviet citizens faced chronic shortages—bread lines, limited consumer goods.

That's irrelevant. I am not saying the Tsar regime was good but that the capitalists countrys outproduced USSR by a large margin.

I dos not say they where lazy, most worked because they belivede in the ideology but the USSR was in not a prosperous country. They overproduced some item and had total lack of others because the state determined what to produce. Thor who worked hard was also looked down for making other look bad.

You should read something about life in the USSR, you are clearly clueless. Communism can sound fine on paper but it does not actually work in realty. Just read som history and you might understand.

What is so funny?

In China as soon as the party did not oppress the population enough the reverted to capitalisms because it's the only thing that ensure that they got the items they needed to stay alive.

Humans need a motivation to work efficiently (normally economical), under Communism this motivation is taken away, resulting in peoples who are not motivated to do anything. They had a saying USSR that was: They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work.

Because it does not take human nature into account and the result is catastrophic whenever it is attempted to be implemented.