jimisroomufotv

I know you mean well, but everyone is on their own journey with this very complex topic, so I feel its difficult to say who is being uncritical or when…especially when your examples are so general and non-specific.
Ill have to read up on the topics you mentioned. Thanks anyway. Have a nice weekend

Thats what I was doing. Asking you what the facts were. Or at least the main bullet points. And telling me JM is a hoaxer doesn’t mean anything unless you tell me what he hoaxed. Not trolling you but just asking for specifics. Can be very confusing for a newcomer.

Could you be more specific about any of those you mentioned? What specifically is untrue or a hoax about any of them? Could you just pick one and provide an example of why its a hoax? I dont know much about any of them so just asking questions.

Please DM a link. I’ve filmed several uap, study the patterns, and find value in making comparisons to other videos.
Thanks.

Can you describe how it moved? Thanks.

None of that mentions a specific data point shared by him, but like I said…never mind.

No doubt. Even in the 40s with the foo fighters. But his Disclosure Project was the first major conference in our time.
I still haven’t heard what specifically folks disagree with him about, but no biggie. Never mind.

Anything? Im neither pro Greer nor anti Greer, but he DID say pilots and military have had encounters and we should take them seriously=>and now we’ve had hearings.
The question was about specificity. What specifically has he said you dont agree with?

I see this claim constantly on social media, and while I totally agree with you, people are rarely specific. What vague ideas? It would help everyone to be specific about at least one, and then folks can discuss from there. Could you mention one please? Thanks.

We lived about 200 miles away from where this happened when I was a kid. Ill never forget the nightly news reports and the hysteria of people thinking this was all made up. Walton has never changed his story to this day.

Truth.
Even those most interested in the topic accept only so much. They want to discuss it, but then suddenly DONT want to discuss it when faced with anecdotal evidence of ETs. “There’s no evidence!” they scream. This wouldnt even be a topic of discussion at all w/o anecdotal evidence.

The info is in the yt video description, but just forget about it. Have a good week.

…more we’ll all learn. Anyway. Thanks for your input. Ill try to include as much data as possible with my captures, will continue to ‘write’ about it regardless of ridicule, and continue to contribute in the best way I know how. Take care.

…is certainly not my first rodeo, and despite Teodorani’s youtube bias in 2009, there a quite a few uap captures by the public which are real, not fakes or cgi, and which have become more prominent over time more regular folks have sightings. The more we observe, compare and ASK QUESTIONS, the…

…on focus, I don’t post them at all. I am one of very few people who try to digitally zoom in while editing so as to show the best representation of what they look like closeup. But its not perfect, and I know it wont translate to some…especially to those who have never had a sighting. This…

…while your site focuses on pilot reports, my research and personal experience comes from ground observation. I cannot plan the sightings and have mostly captured using an iphone, but have been able to film a few with a Nikon P900 or with a Canon FS300 (LA-March 2019)
If the objects aren’t …

YouTube video by jimisroomUFOtv White Orb UFO Makes Sharp Turns (short-edit) -- 27 Mar 2018

…in the same area of Los Angeles which is a known hotspot. The one below was captured on an iphone and not only features spinning and change of shape, but also anomalous flight patterns with sharp turns and erratic behaviour. All this to say…

m.youtube.com/watch?v=uqFE...

…entire object with small appendages or ‘sparks’ as well. Eventually this feature could be added to the list of ‘balls of light’ section on your site. My post was not the first to show this spinning motion. Ive filmed the light orbs as well as dark orbs doing the same. And most to all of them…

…again that my post was in focus and not blurring in and out from an autofocus. I’ve captured several of the ‘balls of light’ UAP, and they manifest differently…pulsing, strobing, glowing, and yes…some of them ‘spin’. Some show a spin on the surface while others appear to show a spin of the…

I expect challenges, but all in context. Your original response to my post was confusing and a turnoff, but I appreciate the pointers. I was finally able to check out the site and your analysis of the pilots sighting over Monterey. While the Monterey sighting is an example of bokeh, I stress…

‘You think’. We’re talking around in circles now. If you want to analyze the original clip, I can send it. But this discussion has hit a wall if you take nothing of what I say seriously.
Ill take a look at the links when I get time. I have other issues to attend to today. Keep smiling Ted.

The orbs I have filmed show as spheres, ovals or egg shaped, elongated, or change shape depending on movement. What else does one call them? Plasmoids?

Ill take a look.
Btw, I wasnt in a car with a windscreen between me and the object when I filmed what I posted.
And I assume this is not your capture, but that was filmed by someone else?

‘Occasionally writing’ is not what you were talking about. You just called it bokeh and dismissed it.
I included the relevant info in the original post, and if anyone has questions (showing that they are serious about analyzing) they can ask them. Ill continue to offer as much info as possible.

Absolutely. That’s what Im telling you.
If it weren’t in focus, I would have never posted it to my channel in the first place.

I can’t speak for others. Once again, if you have pointers to share, share them. But Im not here to field your anger and complaints with the entire field.
I would love an example of one of your captures.

There’s only so much info that one can include on this platform. That’s why I point them to the channel and occasionally write about what I film.
Where are your films, Ted? You obviously have experiences and films of your own, correct?

I know what ‘bokeh’ is Ted. The camera was trained on the object. There are no light artifacts or ‘bokeh’ in between the object and the camera whatsoever.
Same with the other example I stated.

You keep driving ‘bokeh’ while not comprehending what Im telling you. The object is in the best focus possible. Its a spinning object of light, energy…. In the original view, its in focus. When zooming in with the editor, it loses some resolution, but the movement is quite obvious.

Not sure why you said anything in the first place if its useless. Why even waste your time?
Are all people supposed to run their sighting by you first for your blessing?
If you have some pointers to share, share them.